Jump to content
SAU Community

Modified Skyline 0-100 Times


Recommended Posts

No idea what my 0-100 was, but went to the drags with a mate in a well modded early shape WRX (1250ishkg), he was running 12.5, I was 12.7, his lauch was hold limiter, and side step it, with semi slicks. I was holding the limiter and slipping, with exhaust, pods and boost, stock suspension and cheap road tyres, we were both getting 1.6 60ft, check this shot off the mark... This is why stock suspension is so good down the quarter..

Dude do you have some meditation music on in the car because you look so calm and relaxed as your front wheels are lifting in the air!!! Hahahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Harey: Did you get the pineapples done yesterday?

Did you notice any difference...?

Pineapples were fitted yesterday, the rear end feels tighter and better BUT still axle tramps like a WHORE!!!! ARGGHHHH!!!

I spoke to Chris and he said to bring it in for another look as it might be something like engine mounts or transmission mounts.

Sydney Kids list of axle tramp causes:

10% of the time it’s tyre pressures, the sidewall flexes and releases. Try pumping the tyres up and see if the axle tramp stops and/or gets less. done, made no difference

5% of the time it’s worn subframe bushes. Fitted pineapples and still axle tramps

25% of the time its drive shaft angle, the car is TOO LOW and the angle of the universal joints are winding up the drive shafts. If your car is lower than 345 mm centre of wheel to guard on the rear, then try raising it up. 350mm on the rear, so not that low.

60% of the time it’s incorrectly matched spring and shock damper rates. The rebound (extension) damping is not sufficient to control the oscillations of the springs. Standard springs with worn shocks get this problem. BRAND NEW aftermarket coil overs get this problem where the spring rate is too high for the shocks to control. I have brand new bilstein shocks all round

I am starting to run out of ideas!

Edited by Harey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine seemed to have started doing it a little (nothing too bad) a while back, but after fitting my lowered king springs it has cured it... just spins away now...

Good luck finding a cause - if you do be sure to post it up in case anyone else is having the same issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pineapples were fitted yesterday, the rear end feels tighter and better BUT still axle tramps like a WHORE!!!! ARGGHHHH!!!

I spoke to Chris and he said to bring it in for another look as it might be something like engine mounts or transmission mounts.

Sydney Kids list of axle tramp causes:

10% of the time it’s tyre pressures, the sidewall flexes and releases. Try pumping the tyres up and see if the axle tramp stops and/or gets less. done, made no difference

5% of the time it’s worn subframe bushes. Fitted pineapples and still axle tramps

25% of the time its drive shaft angle, the car is TOO LOW and the angle of the universal joints are winding up the drive shafts. If your car is lower than 345 mm centre of wheel to guard on the rear, then try raising it up. 350mm on the rear, so not that low.

60% of the time it’s incorrectly matched spring and shock damper rates. The rebound (extension) damping is not sufficient to control the oscillations of the springs. Standard springs with worn shocks get this problem. BRAND NEW aftermarket coil overs get this problem where the spring rate is too high for the shocks to control. I have brand new bilstein shocks all round

I am starting to run out of ideas!

You just need more power to spin the rear wheels better :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

chris will sort it out

just because brand new, doesnt mean fitted properly or setup correctly

Chris fitted them :/

Yeah I am going to drop it back there and let him do his thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just need more power to spin the rear wheels better :/

Yup I agree but surely at some speed I will want traction :)

Anything on the edge of traction and it axle tramps harshly.

Cold tyres and 4k rpm clutch drop and no axle tramp hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
I dont get how you 170rwkw 33s are pulling 0-100 in sub 5's.

Thats porsche/ferarri/lambo territory. With double the power and similar weight. And they get loads of traction, the standard tires are wider then my cars 4 tires laid side by side :ermm:

I personally would take the gtech readings with a grain of salt

Reading this thread (Digging up threads = searching, har har!) I ended up feeling slightly curious.

If the R35 has 290 awkw and weighs 1740kg, and can get 3.5's you would think surely a 300rwkw GTT/GTST would be well under high 4's given they have the same power and weigh a couple of hundred k's lighter provided they don't lose traction

I am curious to read what Joeyjoejoe/hamish's car actually gets as he said it pulls 285rwkw and doesnt lose any traction in first...

Obviously its not only power and weight and traction that matter, would it simply be the extra (obviously a lot extra) low down and mid range torque to produce figures like 3.5 in a R35? Shorter gear ratio? What do 300-400awkw R32-33-34's get to 100kmh provided traction is no problem? Suppose it would depend massively on how responsive their relative setups are. 100% suspension based? Bit of both?

Curious minds want to know, and prefer to dig up old threads then generate new ones. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my stagea will do 5.65 and thats only on 10psi, no tune, clutch slipping a bit (manuel :bunny: ) and about 150 awkillerwasps

just a chirp from the rears and away you go

eventually the car will see a highflow, nisstune, new clutch and wider wheels (not really needed)

will be interesting to see how much the extra weight affects things

(stock weight is around 1650-1700kg)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my old GTR R33 with 400rwhp did 4.5 seconds consistantly with ok launch, I would be surprised if theres not some high pwered ones doing sub 4's

the new GTR only has @370kw and does it in 3.7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading this thread (Digging up threads = searching, har har!) I ended up feeling slightly curious.

If the R35 has 290 awkw and weighs 1740kg, and can get 3.5's you would think surely a 300rwkw GTT/GTST would be well under high 4's given they have the same power and weigh a couple of hundred k's lighter provided they don't lose traction

I am curious to read what Joeyjoejoe/hamish's car actually gets as he said it pulls 285rwkw and doesnt lose any traction in first...

Obviously its not only power and weight and traction that matter, would it simply be the extra (obviously a lot extra) low down and mid range torque to produce figures like 3.5 in a R35? Shorter gear ratio? What do 300-400awkw R32-33-34's get to 100kmh provided traction is no problem? Suppose it would depend massively on how responsive their relative setups are. 100% suspension based? Bit of both?

Curious minds want to know, and prefer to dig up old threads then generate new ones. :bunny:

I think the highlight here is "provided they don't lose traction".

Personally, I dont understand how Joeyjoejoe can get traction in 1st gear with 285rwkw with a gentle takeoff and then full throttle, I simply cant believe he can launch hard without traction problems on street tyres.

I have 190rwkw with 275 wide new Kumho KU36 tyres and if I launch with anymore than 3,500rpm its too much wheelspin (yes slipping the clutch so controlled launch).

This is compared to the R35 that I understand can launch as hard as you want with full traction. I cannot comment on R32/33/34 GTRs as i have no experience with them.

This is why I am not going to bother fitting a larger turbo to mine, instead will upgrade to a GTR/EVO first.

Edited by Harey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 190rwkw with 275 wide new Kumho KU36 tyres and if I launch with anymore than 3,500rpm its too much wheelspin (yes slipping the clutch so controlled launch).

Don't tell me that! I was hoping my next tyres would be 265 KU36's and hold first :blink:

Personally, I dont understand how Joeyjoejoe can get traction in 1st gear with 285rwkw with a gentle takeoff and then full throttle, I simply cant believe he can launch hard without traction problems on street tyres.

Nismo 1.5 way and Nitto tyres are the key factor for his setup I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 190rwkw with 275 wide new Kumho KU36 tyres and if I launch with anymore than 3,500rpm its too much wheelspin (yes slipping the clutch so controlled launch).

sif! are you sure there isn't some other problem with your setup? (not having a go at you, i just find that hard to believe.. 275 is huge!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't tell me that! I was hoping my next tyres would be 265 KU36's and hold first :blink:

Nismo 1.5 way and Nitto tyres are the key factor for his setup I believe.

I have only ever had the car with 275 KU36s so I cant comment on how much better they are with different tyres. It holds first on mine when they are heated up, I am only saying with a 4,000rpm launch they spin too much for a good 0-100 time.

Yeah the Nismo diff and Nitto tyres will obviously help a lot but I still struggle to comprehend them holding a 4,000rpm launch with 285rwkw. Joey please dont take this as an attack as I am new to skylines but its hard to comprehend for me. Would love to see it though :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sif! are you sure there isn't some other problem with your setup? (not having a go at you, i just find that hard to believe.. 275 is huge!)

Brand new bilsteins, king springs, pineapples, lower control arms, upper control arms. Launches and spins wheels smoothly. I have quite a grippy clutch so maybe thats contributing a bit as it doesnt allow me to slip it much??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah it depends on the type of clutch i guess. if it's a button, they don't like being slipped.. just gotta rev it and dump so i've read.

sounds like you've got all the goodies and it still shreds tyres :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There is a LOT of stuff that can be done, it all depends on how much time and money you want to spend on doing in.  Not all ECUs will be able to do it, and the more control you need the more time and knowledge needs to be put into making it work.  If you're willing to spend the time and money and have the right hardware and skills involved there's a lot that can be done. 
    • I am impressed with all this level of adjustment. I didn't expect all this possibility
    • Correct.  In the case of the 500kw dyno plot I showed you the car actually runs two boost control solenoids for boost control and a 5psi wastegate spring.  It allows me to control how much boost pressure is applied to both sides of the wastegate valve at any point and fairly accurately control boost target as a result. I've tuned it so that it's able to target anywhere from 5psi to 25psi depending on what's needed.  The target tables I've set up in that car are Gear vs RPM, so every gear has potential for a different boost (and torque) curve.   First and second gear have quite low boost targets, third gear actually has different target boost all the way through the rpm range as it's a stock RB25 gearbox - the boost targets have been chosen to maintain a peak of 600nm (what the owner has set as the maximum torque he's happy with putting through the stock 3rd gear) but it carries that to the rev limiter.   The boost curve to achieve that is something of a ramp up, then hold, then ramp up again and the power curve looks more like a flat line haha.  
    • so you can decrease or increase the boost depending on the diet as you wish?     by acting on the wastegate?
    • That's torque and power, it's all from a single run.  The boost curve is "held back" from it's peak target in the 3500rpm to 5000rpm range from memory, so it ramps hard to something like 18psi then climbs more progressively to 23psi nearer 5000rpm.   It makes the torque (and power) ramp more "natural" and less hard on parts and traction, it doesn't feel artificially held back.   
×
×
  • Create New...