Jump to content
SAU Community

Non Car People


Recommended Posts

Hey ppl,

I was just wondering how often you have to deal with people that aren't into cars in your life.

I gotta say sometimes it really shits me.

Some of the questions I've had to put up with from friends, family and collegues include:

- Why spend so much on something so old?

- Why is it so loud?

- Whats the point of a fast car when you can only go 100km/h?

- Do you know how much you could have saved if you bought something sensible?

- Do you think you are fully sick when you go for a cruise?

Those are just a sample but I just wanted to hear about other peoples experiences? At least on SAU I know that it is a bunch of people who understand...

I bought the car for me because I like it. For many people to them it would be a piece of shit, which is fine but justifying it to people who don't get it is an impossible task. I've had my current skyline for 1.5yrs and the one before it for 2 yrs so it's not something new I've had to deal with but it has become increasingly annoying!

Who feels my pain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I call them KANACs - Know Absolutely Nothing About Cars...

^^^This fortunately was brought up by yourself in a Performance Imports magazine article Kristian.

And it's not to be confused with CANUKS (aka Canadians) although...

although...

whilst growing up in the 1950s-60s, people all preferred manual transmission in Australia.

As I visited relatives in Vancouver/Calgary/Edmonton in '66, the populace had all gone over to Auto

And on coming back to Oz and then buying an Alfetta GTV all the Alfa technos insisted that "Automatics are for cripples"!

And how things have changed since the 80s :P

Lots of people who grew up with me, and mad about cars > gone soft in the belly :)

1 step away from a 4W-scooter!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find more annoying is talking to someone who thinks they know about cars but clearly doesn't. :)

Yeah that can really be annoying also!

I've had a few people look at mine and say "aww yeah, is that the turbo?... No match for a v8 though, ey!?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel sorry for them.

Fancy buying a car (your second most expensive purchase in your life) on the basis of money, colour, fuel economy. You buy a house because you like it right? Why should it be any different when buying a vehicle. For people that see the motor vehicle as a mode of transport and nothing more, catch a fking bus.

I love cars, Ive loved everyone I have ever owned for one (or more) reason or another.

Driving a car is something that should engage you, not escape you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nothing beats the "100kmph" line i get that all the fkn time fkn shits me. :)

Yeah but you can always say "Can you get to 100km/h in 4.5 seconds". And Plus cars are fun to drive, I have a blast sometimes just burling around (at or below the speed limit) in my VP Commodore wagon, can you put a price on something that puts a smile on your face and lets you feel that freedom, like for those few minutes you can do anything.

I agree with RBNT, i'm already looking at what car i'm gonna buy for when I have kids even though thats probably 4-5 years away. And fuel economy will not be an issue, the only issue is how much I can afford to pay, money no object Audi RS6 wagon :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You people are all sickos and just waste our environment and shiz . Whats wrong with quiet sunny days and walks in the forrest .

PS: Anyone want to fax me a crank pulley removal tool , cause i just blew my water pump and hoses while going backwards on redline in 3rd at the collie 2 day drift assault .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find more annoying is talking to someone who thinks they know about cars but clearly doesn't. ;)

haha ive had numerous people ask me if my 4 door was a gtr :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one of the most common ones I hear is:

"does it make that pshht sound?"

and u half cringe when u say yes because normally the next thing out of their mouths is something like "all the woggy guys drive THOSE sort of cars" or "so your one of those fully sick guys"

im a bloody aussie jew, give me a break... im not trying to be fully sick, its just my motor releasing the pressure my turbo has produced..... :thumbsup:

"your motor does wha?" ;)

never mind, you dont you just go buy a prius....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get these all the time, especially in relation to my bike... “what do you need a fast car for, isn’t that why you got the bike?”... followed by “but isn’t the bike faster as well?” my response to all but one question is;

“if you have to ask, you’ll never understand.”

In relation to “you can only go 100kph.” I respond;

“my speeding fines say otherwise”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are so fucking annoying, I don't even bother to explain, I just laugh at them.

Half the commodore fuck's not know shit about turbo Skyline's.

When you are driving up a hill next to them and they hear your Air pod(s) (Or if you have a wank BOV) that make a 'choo' noise, after changing gears / closing off the throttle, they think you want to race them, but it's normal, as you need to put your foot right down on the accelerator and the turbo(s) have to spool = make boost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are a few variables here, some are relevant but not critical (IMHO) to help answer your question. The two major things: 1) Ignoring anything to do with forced induction - all engines have their own natural torque curve, and it will ALWAYS roll over higher in the rpm.  There is a fixed relationship between power and torque.  When dealing with kw and nm, the relationship between them is roughly: kw = (rpm * nm) / 9549 nm = (kw / rpm) * 9549 The peak torque of an engine (without boost) will typically climb until somewhere nearish the middle of it's operating rev range, give or take a bit - then start dropping again.   The nearer the minimum and maximum rpm of the engine the steeper that drop off tends to be. 2) Boost simply increases the density of the air going into the engine, which inflates the torque at that point.  The ramp up in the torque curve you see on a turbo engine is due to the boost rising, but it's essentially just multiplying the torque you'd see if it was naturally aspirated.  The roll over you see at the end will typically be what would have always happened with the engine, whether it was naturally aspirated or turbocharged.   If the torque never started dropping then power would climb infinitely. The cool thing about this is you absolutely can tune the power delivery to suit the needs of the owner and/or the limitations of the car, and I regularly do this.    With modern turbos we've got to the point where a setup that someone may run well over 20psi of boost with could actually reach target boost well under 4000rpm if the tuner/owner WANTED to - and a lot of people seem to do this when there is actually no realistic benefit, generally it just adds a massive amount of strain to the engine and drivetrain and often actually makes the car harder to drive. As a general rule I tend to tune the boost curves for cars I tune to reach a "useful" torque level through the rev range and will often end up with a curve that ramps hard to a point, then creeps for the rest of the rev range - not to make the boost curve "soft" as such, but more to make sure its neither laggy nor pointlessly violent in it's delivery.   There have been cars I've tuned to be almost like a centrifugal supercharger (or naturally-aspirated-ish) where they actually only hit like 8psi of boost before opening the gate, then ramp up the next 10psi over the rev range... if the car is "loose enough" to drive. On the flip side I've tuned a car that had stock cams and the engine's natural torque curve fell over HARD in the higher rpm and resulted in a slightly awkward power curve to work with, in that case I actually started ramping up boost to boost torque in a way to offset the engines "NA" torque drop off... at peak rpm actually running a good 5psi+ more boost that what the "flat curve" would have defined.  This gave the owner an extra 500rpm or so of useable rev range, and had a fairly solid impact on times he was running at motorsport events due to being able to hold gears a bit longer and also falling into a more useful part of the rev range in the following gears. Here's an example of an RB in a GTSt I've done the "softened" boost curve to not pointlessly ramp straight to the max boost target early in the rpm, but still made sure it builds useful boost.  If you went in the car you'd not guess at all that the boost curve was doing anything "weird", it feels like it spools immediately and accelerates relentlessly (traction dependent) and holds to max rpm.   I don't know if you'd guess what the boost curve was doing by driving the car, or even looking at the dyno plot... but imho it suits the combination.  
    • therefore on the first examples, as we see, changing cams (graph 2) influences the quantity of torque at high revs its OK for me. so a tuner can act on the wastegate via the boost controller to increase the boost at high revs? on the last example, the boost does not decrease ok, but the torque does. this can come from cams etc etc ok. but on the other curves the boost is not constant, it increases, this is what I find strange to my mind. even more so if it comes from the relief valve. sorry I'm very new don't blame me. in my mind I couldn't imagine how the boost could be higher after the spool  
    • right, but fundamentally, for a given mechanical setup, you are either using all the torque (and therefore power) it will give, or you are choosing to run it less efficiently. Many tuners will have a practice of identifying peak available torque and then winding it back a couple of % for safety, but unless you are working around a very specific issue like a weak gearbox, there is nothing to be gained by making 20 or 30% less than the engine can
    • You can manipulate the torque delivery by ramping in boost gently, then throwing it all in after peak torque to keep the torque flat. It's nothing magical.
    • Tuning the wastegate to do it. That is all. Most people want the boost to not fall off like the most recent example. Those also look like dyno runs with an Auto/Torque converter setup, which does fun things to the graph. The boost tapers down like that because the turbo cannot supply the same amount of air at 7000rpm that it can at 3000 in terms of PSI. That, or the tuner has decided that it tapering off like that is what someone chose to do. IF you have a wastegate that can't bleed enough air to slow the turbine, and IF that turbo can flow enough air to feed the engine at high RPM, you get 'boost creep' which is a rise of boost pressure beyond what you are capable of controlling and/or want. None of these show symptoms of that, but if you had a run that was 20psi at 3000rpm, and 27psi at 7000rpm, it could be an example of that. Or simply that the person wanted boost later for their own reasons... The dyno graphs don't always show the full context.
×
×
  • Create New...