Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Recently purchased some federal 595 RSR with the plan to run them at superlap in the clubsprint class.

Imagine my horror when after only 15 laps of wakefield at no more than 5 laps at a time one being warm up and another being cool down the tyres appear to have split the casings like retreds.

But the worst thing was the local suppliers reaction....

"After looking at them closely it is clear that they have ‘tread splice overlap feathering’ – this is not uncommon in tyres used for track work and is usually the result of heat build up.

With Federal 595RS-R’s the tread splice overlap is where the top layer of the tread has been joined to the lower layer when the tyre is built, this splice is not where the tread is actually joined to the inner casing of the tyre and when it begins to ‘feather’ like it has in these photos it does not affect the performance of the tyre.

Through our testing and extended use on competition level drift cars, circuit cars and high performance street cars with 595RS-R’s we have never seen a tread separation or delamination caused by the tread splice over lap.

In 2008 Federal tyres sponsored Nathan Weissel in the Drift Australia series and supplied 595RS-R’s for his vehicle. During testing we noticed that the tread splice on his tyres was feathering and after advice from Federal Taiwan decided to re-run the same tyres to see if the splice got any worse.

Nathan wore these and many other 595RS-R’s down to the casing with only one delamination for the entire series and we believe that this was because of the tyre mounting the top of a ripple strip while spinning.

In the extremely unlikely event of one of these tyres delaminating due to this tread splice, it will qualify for a pro-rata warranty replacement."

What bothers me is the offer to replacment on pro-rata basis in the event it fails, without having looked at anything other than these pictures. If the tyre fails at eastern creek @ 250+ the last thing I will care about is a F***ing pro rata replacment.

Considering what I paid for now useless tyres, I'm nothing short of outraged im now out $1400 with no tyres for superlap.

So now my winge is over has this happened to anyone else? if so what did federal do?

Also note i didn't drift or overheat the tyres and the email quoeted is word for word and complete.

Cheers

post-59442-1272262053_thumb.jpg

post-59442-1272262064_thumb.jpg

post-59442-1272262076_thumb.jpg

post-59442-1272262084_thumb.jpg

Check (if you live in usa): Kroger Weekly Ad, or Myer catalogue.
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318181-federal-tyres-splitting/
Share on other sites

very interesting,

i know i have issue with my federal (595 SS) tearing apart when i use them for drifting, having talked to a some other drifters it seems like a common problem and the best way to solve this is to put the tyre on in the incorrect direction.

However not directly related to your issue but it seems that federal tyres may have few issues.

Thanks for the info I guess for me running the tyre backwards won't help, my big fear is seperation at speed. I guess my only option is to buy more tyres from a slightly better manufacturer and let everyone I come accross know about the poor servive and product.

very interesting,

i know i have issue with my federal (595 SS) tearing apart when i use them for drifting, having talked to a some other drifters it seems like a common problem and the best way to solve this is to put the tyre on in the incorrect direction.

However not directly related to your issue but it seems that federal tyres may have few issues.

Edited by grygtr

Those tyres have barely been pushed. You haven't even feathered the edge of the tread blocks.

I would respond to their email and point out that you are not interested in pro rata replacement if and when it delaminates due to the obvious safety concerns/potential damage that will result in a high speed delamination on a race track.

State that you will be pursuing the matter through the Dept of fair trading/small claims court if you are not satisfied with their response. You will be seeking a full refund as they are not performing as advertised.

Basically, they are a high performance tyre, they are near new and they have started to come apart. You wouldn't accept it on the cheapest of tyres. They are advertised as a competition/motorsport tyre http://www.federaltyres.com.au/specs/ss595.pdf

Have a look at the dept of fair trading website in the mean time under the warranty section. The tyres are new, you have a warranty, they have to honour it, it's the law. http://www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/Consumer...warranties.html

You have everything you need to back yourself and get a refund or replacement.

Edited by badhairdave

You've got 4 pictures up, did this happen to 4 of 4 tyres? Or 1? How many? Maybe I missed it.

I drift in the SS's, I've never come across this problem. I know many people using the RS-Rs as well and haven't had a complaint either.

also, what size tyre were they?

It happened to all 4, 265/35/18 the are RS-Rs

You've got 4 pictures up, did this happen to 4 of 4 tyres? Or 1? How many? Maybe I missed it.

I drift in the SS's, I've never come across this problem. I know many people using the RS-Rs as well and haven't had a complaint either.

also, what size tyre were they?

Well that sucks...

Where did you actually buy them from, and who was the email from? Just wondering if maybe they were old stock that was lieing around for a while?

Also, SAU:NSW has a deal going with Federal Tyres to supply members affordable tyres from their range, so I'm a bit disapointed to see this on all four tyres!

Maybe a PM would be better then public...

I had the same thing happen to at least one of my tyres (235/45R17 595RS)... at the time I thought it was just a cut from sliding over something sharp at motorkhana, didn't really look in to it any further, but after seeing your photos that exactly what mine looked like.

Didn't seem to cause any problems, thought the tyres have only seen a couple of short sprints to 200km/hr, they have never done any real hard sustained track work.

They were fairly old stock - 07 build?

Edited by samstain

It would not be fair to name names, I was asking a broad question as to if this had happened to others, I know 2 others in canberra whom this has happened to, so I was assuming this was a broader problem.

I also considered this to be a matter of saftey im sure others have the same issue without even knowing.

I can assure you these were NOT part of an SAU group buy and may be a local supply issue.

I purchased these from a local workshop that got them straight from a local supplier in canberra.

Well that sucks...

Where did you actually buy them from, and who was the email from? Just wondering if maybe they were old stock that was lieing around for a while?

Also, SAU:NSW has a deal going with Federal Tyres to supply members affordable tyres from their range, so I'm a bit disapointed to see this on all four tyres!

Maybe a PM would be better then public...

IMO those tyres are unroadworthy, and therefore you qualify for full replacement. The Fair Trading laws are strong and clear. Force them to replace the tyres, as you say its a safety issue.

I wouldnt wait until it delaminates to get qualify for replacements. How f**king stupid is that!

Its like saying my new bottom end has a knock, and waiting for the piston to exit the block before doing anything about it.

I had these tyres that lasted for over 20,000 road ks and a few track days, they had these marks on them after a while, it never did anything and they were quite shallow. I personally wouldnt be that wourried about it but would watch and make sure they dont open up further, my guess is if you have the tyres on the right way they wont open up further

Hi guys

We are a reseller of these and also run the Federal Time Attack S14. We have found this is part of normal wear for a Street based Motorsport tyre. The tyres on our S14 has similar signs at the tread splice this however does not affect the performance of the tyre not the safety of them.

The S14 was initially built for National Level drifting and has gone through MANY pairs of RSR's used on the rear in 235/40/18 stretched onto 18x10 rims. The wear was smooth and even across each and every tyre, never did we have the tyres delaminate or fall apart.

Since becoming exclusively a Time Attack competitor it has seen 40+'C days at Queensland Raceway with the tyres never missing a beat even after 6 solid fast laps before having to pull in to let the car cool.

I have saved the photos and sent them to our Federal Distributor and I'd say they might offer you some advice.

Just a round up, we see this on ours, it is just the tread splice becoming visible as the tread wears and is nothing we are concerned with, on our own cars sponsored and personal cars, as we see this on most Street based Motorsport tyre.

Hope this helps. :)

Hi Guys!

Along with Paul who posted above I also drive the mentioned S14a, on Federals RS-R Tires.

I also work for the QLD Federal Importer.

As mentioned I personally use the RS-R and have for quite some time, in many different applications.

The tread splicing in the top layer is approximately a 45degree beveled join. After a short session the tread join becomes visible, and just feathers out around the aformentioned join. Being a softer compound motorsport orientated tire it is certainly not uncommon to see the tread join open up, and it is not detrimental to the tire or its performance.

Usually as the tire wears down, the 'problem' visible tread join disappears.

For certain applications we have buffed the tread surface down for shallower tread, and the tread join becomes not visible.

Usually the tread join is only visible as the tires in its new state, as with the soft compound and deep tread, the tread has a likely hood to move more than it would when its beginning to wear.

Hope This Helps

Robby Mounfield

Good to hear it appears to be only a cosmetic problem, but how would you stop a cop from defecting you? An official statement from Federal would probably do the job - does one exist that owners could print out and keep in the glove box? If Federal are not willing to issue such a statement then I'd still be demanding replacements - you don't want to be relying on hearsay if something bad happens.

Good to hear it appears to be only a cosmetic problem, but how would you stop a cop from defecting you? An official statement from Federal would probably do the job - does one exist that owners could print out and keep in the glove box? If Federal are not willing to issue such a statement then I'd still be demanding replacements - you don't want to be relying on hearsay if something bad happens.

I doubt a cop would even look twice at them, when you see them up close in real life its really obvious they are only a surface mark, when i first saw mine i, like others, just thought i had run over somthing sharp and didnt worry about it because it obviously wasnt deep enough to cause a problem.

I've used these for a couple of years on my stagea (circuit and road), and 350z (circuit, motorkhana skids and road) without any problems. might be a bad batch, might be bad luck...either way I would not accept anything but replacement or refund.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, that was one of the things we learned fast in the past with our MX5. When you drive with the top down, you are effectively standing out in the sun, 100% of the time, and not getting in any shade (because roads aren't shaded generally!). Just like standing out in the middle of a field on a sunny 27C day is a bit of a bad plan, so is sitting in a MX5 without sun protection.
    • I also just ordered some Frankenstein bolts and side mounts to fit a hard top Just in case I do find one, basically so it doesn't need to be fixed to the car with only the front latch.......and then gaffa tape to keep it in place for the RTN journey from wherever I get it
    • If your temps are fine now, you probably won't have any issues with where your vents are as they don't look right up at the windscreens high pressure area, so any differences when giving it the beans for extended happy laps would be minimal, but, they should vent heaps when stuck in traffic  Much like how that reverse cowl on my SS let "visible" heat out when stationary, but, because it was basically at the windscreen my coolant temps on the Hwy actually raised because air was being fed into it at speed (110kph), to only come back down to around 90° when I got off the Hwy And your 100% correct about the NC currently not needing vents, but, if I was to add a turbo, and a oil cooler and intercooler in front of the condenserand radiator, and then take it to the track???? It is apparently a recommend requirement if I don't want to worry about coolant or oil temp issues, but, any of the above are possible scenarios, over time As it sits now, with the triple pass radiator and stock air conditioning system, I have absolutely no issues with either temps or air conditioning efficiency, I've been basically daily driving thie car for the last month, both on the Hwy, and peak hour, bumper to bumper traffic, but, that's pretty much expected from basically a standard engine  Talking about no issues daily driving, it was 39° the other day and I was sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on the M5 and then M7, with the top down, and with the air conditioning blowing nice cold air on my feet, balls, and face, well, there was one issue, my head and arms got pretty sun burnt Note to self: leave a hat and sunscreen in the car for such days 🤣
    • I would agree, unless you need something specific to the HV motor/battery side repaired or investigated, any mechanic will be able to perform normal services, but if you prefer, maybe look for a mechanic who regularly services/repairs Nissans, the VQ engines are pretty common in the Nissan lineup.  Sorry, I can't make any suggestions, I don't live in Vic.
    • Some of them keep working fine. 9 out of 10 of them end up causing an absolute misery bleeding the system and get thrown on the workshop floor in a tantrum and never thought about again because they were never really needed and just added crap to the car that we could have done without. Same-same with HICAS, A-LSD, and various other stupidities that over eager 10x engineers thought we had to have.
×
×
  • Create New...