Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hiya all, after reading the wastegate size thread I noticed that some of the rwkw figures seemed very high when compared to mine (we use bhp in the UK so I'm not too sure of the conversion). This is how I think my conversion works

I have 400bhp at the flywheel, which is 300kw at the fly, which is 200rwkw

Does that rwkw figure seem low?

Here's my maths, 400bhp/1.33=300kw and rwkw is 2/3 of fly kw so =200kw

Anyone got any idea? Going from the numbers SydneyKid used in the wastegate thread I should have around 250rwkw?

Cheers for your help......................................................IanH

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31826-rwkw-to-bhp-and-back/
Share on other sites

Well, I've had her dyno'd in her current state and got 253rwhp, which works out to 190rwkw (not far off the 200 I'd guessed) but again this seems low when other people mention their 230-250rwkw figures for GTS-t's in the wastegate thread. I've had a lot of work done on the engine (new turbo, FMIC, bigger injectors pumps, Boost to 17.5psi, clutch etc) and wonder what other GTT owners are getting for theirs?

Cheers..........................................................................

.....IanH

Hi there, you got 190 rwhp for what kind of modification?

on 4th gear, I got 217.7 hp, with full turbo back, and air filter, running 8 or 9 psi :D

Opps, I meant 190rwkw not hp anyway, Heres the list -

Engine

Trust TD05-18g Turbo

HKS S-Type FMIC

Blitz SBC-iD @ 1.2bar (17.5psi)

Nismo 480cc injectors

Nismo Fuel pump

Tomei 1.4mm Headgasket

NGK Iridium Plugs

Apexi PowerFC & H/C

HKS Downpipe

HKS De-cat

Blitz Nur spec Exhaust

z32 AFM

Trust 13 Row Oil Cooler

Stock Air Box but with a Nismo S-Tune filter in (Ive bought an Apexi PowerIntake filter which arrive next week)

Other

R33GTR Brembo Front Calipers and discs with Ferrodo DS2500 pads

R34GTR Clutch

Lots of carbon fibre bits

HKS SSQV BOV

Cusco Catch Tank

R34GTR Rims

Top Secret copy Front bar & Bonnet

Tomei Kevlar Timing belt

With all that I'm making a little short of what I expected (which was 200rwkw) but the induction kit should help that out.

It just seems odd that people are making a lot higher rwkw figures but with less engine work being done, which was why I wanted my maths checking!

i have a tad more power out of my r33 gts-t. only engine mods being fmic high flowed turbo an bigger fuel pump. everything else standard.

This is the sort of thing I'm on about. My car is producing over 100bhp more than standard (276 Vs 385) but a GTS-t has the same amount from only minor mods. There has GOT to be something going wrong in the way I'm doing the conversion. There is NO WAY a a GTS-t can produce over 100bhp extra with those mods so that means my rwkw figure MUST be too low!

Can anyone make any sense of this as it's doin my head in!

IanH if your car was here in Sydney and run on a Dyno Dynamics Dyno and you got 190rwkw with alllll those mods i'd be taking it all back and getting a refund :D

Either your tuner doesn't know what he's doing or your different climate and dyno conditions are putting your power figures out compared to here.

Ian,

To 2 decimal places the conversions are as follows:

1hp - 0.75kw

1kw - 1.34hp

My suggestion would be for you to go to your closest proper drag strip (0-400m) & tell us what 60ft, ET & most importantly MPH you get. These figures will go a fair way to telling you how much power you're making (when compared to the cars weight). Even a poor effort on the drag strip will give a good indiction when the full 60ft, ET & MPH is used.

Trying to compare YOUR dyno number with our Aussie dyno numbers isn't much good. For starters what type of dyno does your tuner use? How is the dyno configured, i.e what sort of drivetrain to fly difference does it show? For example, the US Dynojet dyno shows a much smaller drop btw flywheel to rw than Aussie dyno's USA 250hp ='s 210rwhp Aussie 250hp ='s 170rwhp

As a side issue, what is the Trust TD05-18G rated at?

EDIT: - One other small thing Ian, how did you figure your engine to be making 385bhp? I take it the UK dyno's have some form of rw to flywheel conversion, yes? Unless you've had your engine removed & run on a engine dyno even the 385hp figure is a bit of a rough estimate.

Cheers,

Matt

I agree with benm, You can get way more KW with those mods, franks from sydney get 200 kw with one bar boost, with only full turbo bac, filter, HKS type S cooler, FMIC, tuned Power fc, oil cooler, replace head gasket.

I think you should tune your car elsewhere to produce better output :)

Can you send me picture of your car to [email protected] :D It looks awesome I guess. BTW r33 brembo brakes can be fit into r34 ?

If u search the forums, sydneykid wrote an interesting post on flywheel to rear wheel losses. He believes the loss is a set figure rather then a percentage. Im not gettin into that debarcle but he says most 33's have a loss of 62kws from fly to wheels. Ie standard 33 Gtst with 187kws at motor will have 125rwkws. Sounds rite to me.

He believes the loss is a set figure rather then a percentage. Im not gettin into that debarcle but he says most 33's have a loss of 62kws from fly to wheels.

That sounds good to me as well! If I had 230rwkw + 62= 292rwkw*1.34 = 390bhp which is almost what I'm running (according to a Rollin Road dyno (385bhp)

now 230rwkw is more like the figure I was hoping for :headbang:

eriktufa - YHM :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I might have to say it.
    • Ahh... it's an early RE5R01A box, that means the pinouts I gave are wrong (they were for the RE4R01A 4-speed box)... I'll have to dig around in my docs to see if I've got that schematic (they used the same gearbox plug, with the vacant pin wired to the direct drive clutch solenoid)...prolly hidden away in a supplement somewhere... ...there were 3 variants of the RE5R01A ~ this early schema was what we called the 'dumb' 5 speed ; it's what jatco called a 'medium duty' box, with torque holding up roughly ~200ft/lbs or so, which was good for NA from RB20/25DE and up to around VG30 output spec. With the RB25DET (and VG33/35 mills), the only options they had was the 4-speed 4AX00 box, which had been beefed up to handle the extra torque (primarily for the VG35, but it also suited the RB25DET mill and others)...and the RE4R03 box in large 4WDs a lot of the time... ...the next variant of 5-speed was redesigned, stronger, and 'smart'...first ones had external TCU with internal (on valvebody) Shift Control Unit, pressure switches, and 2 x TSS...and the last ones had internal TCU+SCU setup, with CANbus control etc etc. @DRoc81 On the RHS of the box towards the rear, there should be a stamped silver ID tag -- what's the model number? Oh...and with the early 5-speeds, the torque converter control solenoid assembly should be replaced as well (31940-60X00)...it's a bit Murphy's Law ....if one has failed, bet on the rest not being far behind ...
    • I remembered wrong, but was close though 1Kz setting because those Jaycar SSRs don't go any faster, 1x pump per SSR with flyback diodes & heatsinks. In saying that, the heatsinks are overkill. Just on an alloy plate is more than sufficient. You'll find without a flyback diode, your SSRs will heat up big time and also die prematurely.  I've been running the two same SSRs since the last motor, no issues, car does 2 hour straight drives in summer once in a while and gets punished on the track. Nothing melts, no hot messes, etc.    
    • Hmm. You're probably best off working out what the lobe centreline or even the LSA is for the stock cams, with VCT OFF. That's bound to be out there somewhere. Then, work on the assumption that the Kelford centreline is probably the same, and wouldn't be more than a couple of degrees away, if it is different at all. I'm very surprised that you needed to adjust the exhaust cam by 5° to get it on spec. That screams there's another problem somewhere. Anything from the belt being 1 tooth off (how many degrees is one tooth worth?) to simple user/measurement error on the degree wheel. I say this because Kelford, like most quality cam manufacturers these days, does a pretty good job of actually making the cams to spec, not relying on patching it up afterwards like we had to do back in the 80s.
    • Besides packing it, you can also fill your pump through the oil filter inlet port. After cranking for what felt like an eternity without pressure, i fed a tube in through there and filled it with oil. Cranked for a few seconds after that and had pressure. 
×
×
  • Create New...