Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i'd be more inclined to say more around the figure of 100hp more than what a worked rb20 would make. i think that even getting to 200hp in a rb20 would take a fair bit. not saying it couldn't be done, but it would be a fair bit of work (and money) getting there judging by how much it takes to get a rb25 there.

and look i'm all for doing something different, but when it comes to building an engine to go into a race car, why bother building something when there are other options out there that will do the job better? going something like a sr20ve would give you 20 to 30% more power, and a less weight. we aren't just talking about building something to be different to show off to people with. we are talking about something to win races with, so why not give yourself a good platform to start with, especially when you are talking about a motor that is putting out nearly 40kw more in stock form.

The 36mm restrictor only allows around 300hp on any engine no matter how big the turbo.

There is an IPRA corolla with a 3S-GTE in it that runs a GT30 turbo, without a wastegate!, so it runs about 22-23PSI through the mid range but then tapers off to about 14psi at redline due to the restrictor and makes around 290hp on race gas.

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The OP mention he is not allowed a turbo, and I imagine he may need to keep the same "original engine". As good as the SR20VE maybe - it may not meet regulations.

Maybe we have to take a step back from the "max amount of power I can get" mentality and possibly more towards reliability and engine response side of things (nothing wrong with more power - maybe look at it from a different angle - is what I'm trying to say).

Since you will be revving the engine quite hard constantly - engine balance, oiling systems and cooling would be the first things to look at.

As with any race engine build - reliabilty should be right up there with performance, no point having all these KW and having the engine break down on you...

If it is improved production than he can turbo it...it will just be in the Over 2L category.

Engine also needs to have the same amount of cylinders as per factory.

So while we have all said sr20 is the best bet....if its a skyline you want to race than you cant do it.

But..

a 32 chassis will be 300kgs heavier than the honda's so even if you could get 300hp NA outta the 20 it wont be enough to be at the pointy end.

Best bet would be to start with a S series chassis imo

If it is improved production than he can turbo it...it will just be in the Over 2L category.

Engine also needs to have the same amount of cylinders as per factory.

So while we have all said sr20 is the best bet....if its a skyline you want to race than you cant do it.

But..

a 32 chassis will be 300kgs heavier than the honda's so even if you could get 300hp NA outta the 20 it wont be enough to be at the pointy end.

Best bet would be to start with a S series chassis imo

r32 did have a 4 cylinder option (ca18)

iseekool, what you said about response, having a built rb20 is going to mean having all the power at very high revs (as you are going to need a high reving engine to actually get the power). that isn't always a good thing. makes it slower off the line as you will either have to slip the clutch to keep the revs up high until you really get going, or you will have to just fry the tyres. that would be a similar problem as to what the hondas would have though, but since they are in a much lighter car and would probably be putting out similar sorts of power to what a rb20 could, it wouldn't be so much of an issue.

r32 did have a 4 cylinder option (ca18)

iseekool, what you said about response, having a built rb20 is going to mean having all the power at very high revs (as you are going to need a high reving engine to actually get the power). that isn't always a good thing. makes it slower off the line as you will either have to slip the clutch to keep the revs up high until you really get going, or you will have to just fry the tyres. that would be a similar problem as to what the hondas would have though, but since they are in a much lighter car and would probably be putting out similar sorts of power to what a rb20 could, it wouldn't be so much of an issue.

Your right there Marc - maybe a work around would to have slightly lower geared diff to compensate - only problem would be on wide open tracks with long straights...

Your all negative nancy's. I'd be aiming to make peak power at about 8000rpm, you want the most rediculous cams you can find, adjustible gears for fine tuning power, matched length inlet runners (doesnt have to be ITB's, at the cost of responce you could get a better tune with a large single) and exhaust pipes (for that RPM) decent headwork and oversized std valves (not titanium), lightweight pistons, aim for a compression ratio in the mid 12's, but do it properly (with the pistons coming out past the deck, as far as the thickness of the headgasket) then get really good management and get a good tuner to tune it properly.

You want the tuner to monitor EGT's, to run the optimal fuel mixture (between 12.5-13.2) and the maximum ignition timing without creating too much heat or causing detonation.

General lightweight gear (flywheel to wheels) and 4.4 diff gears, it wont be slow, easy >200hp then just ring its neck. It doesnt take rediculous amounts of power to go fast, it really depends what its for.

If you get all the supporting mods sorted (oil pump, lifters, balencing - from balancer to clutch and everything in between) it will be a beast, and the power it makes could suprise you, providing you do your math right and ensure everything is 100% matched for a peak torque and power at the same spot. You need to talk to a really good professional engine builder, dont go to an RB specialist, go to somone who can get 200hp out of an oldschool pinto, and they'll work wonders :yes:.

Good to see there's plenty of opinions, thanks for the replies all.

Some good points have been raised, here's a few things to clarify.

Improved production rules state that the engine block must have the same number of cylinders as was available in the original car, and must be from the same manufacturer. So for those who have mentioned it, you could run an SR powered Skyline if you want to.

This also means you could put this fantasy 200hp NA Rb20 into a light(er) R30 or R31 chassis - but that said, you should be able to strip an r32 down to a similar weight and make use of the updated suspension components.

And to be a front runner, well if we use the Civics as a benchmark, they are using engines which put out around 150kw from the factory, so you'd have to assume in race trim they would be up around 180kw??? (at the engine). They are also in a chassis which weighs around 1150kg from the factory.

But then again, you don't necessarily have to run at the front of the field to have fun (and besides, did anyone even listen to this thing?

I know you want to run in the U2L catagory, but why not run in the over 2L with a twin cam RB30 or a 25.

There isnt much weight to be taken out of a 32 in IPRA because you has to run factory panels and glass.

I dont want to sound like a negative nancy, but there are reasons that there are next to zero skylines in IPRA, because they are so restricted by the rules.

well revs will be your friend

how bout using an rb25 and destroking it?? custom crank and rods (not as expensive as you'd think)

plus some one mention the power stroke on an 8 cyl is 45, sorry its actually 90 like the 4 pot, hence why any engine with cylinder's of multiple's of 3's are the smothest, not a v8

well revs will be your friend

how bout using an rb25 and destroking it?? custom crank and rods (not as expensive as you'd think)

plus some one mention the power stroke on an 8 cyl is 45, sorry its actually 90 like the 4 pot, hence why any engine with cylinder's of multiple's of 3's are the smothest, not a v8

Actually I think we are both wrong.

I just did some research (because I was curious)

I4 fires every 180 degrees

I6 fires every 120 degrees

V8 fires every 90 degrees or 180 degrees - depending on engine design.

Anyways here is a good read ---> http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/engine/smooth1.htm

It talks about engine designs.

In short,

SRDE/T = S13 because of less weight

Sr16/20VE = N15/N14/N13 because of less weight.

Fj = Dr30, again less weight.

In all honesty, If you want to race in IPRA, id go a turbo car. Chance are, your not going be highly ranked in the over 2L/turbo class, but you will be involved in the middle of the field mixing it up with competitors and thats what you want if your in IRPA, to be involved with other racers in a race environment.

My best best - Rb25DET in a 32, basic engine mods and attention spend on brakes/rubber/suspension.

im pretty sure the rb20's have the same size hydrualic lifters as the rb25, and ive done a few rb25 solid lifter conversions at work

plus camtech has on their website rb20/rb25 so quite possibly you could run with the rb25 cams in your 20 head, bit of porting, port match the intake manifold, can the injector part off the manifold weld a plate onto it and drill holes to suit the rb26 ITB

my curent rb30de build is expecting to pass $15k easy (almost built just waiting for full license in november)

I'd start with a cheap throw away motor to trial on:

I'd get a cheap 20de, machine the crank down to minimum weight then ballanced, open up all the oil galleries etc... GTR tb's are 45mm each- thats alot of blade area for a 2lt engine, but they're cheap and relativly easy to fitt. Machine the block/head down to a good comp ratio and invest in some crazy cams/lifters. Good exh manifold...

Re-tune the stock ecu and see how it goes...

All up it shouldn't cost tooo much if its a flop. If you see good gains, then throw al the good gear into a race engine with short skirt forgies, better manifold/runners and ecu.

I say dooo iiittt!!!

Or if it really sucks- throw 300hp worth of nitrous at it on methanol!!!

Good to see a few people with enthusiasm for the project :)

For those who wanted to use a SR20ve... Have you seen any examples of people mounting them longitudinally (such as using them to replace a SR20de or RB?) From what I can tell, this is going to be much more expensive and difficult than building up a fancy rb20, but by all means prove me wrong.

As for expense.... it does build up quickly. Browsing through some of the gear, prices like $400 for valve springs, $1200+ for rods etc certainly make me stop and think. Maybe using a $100 wrecker motor bottom end is the way to go while developing the head.

I'd go SR20 for track use. Way more off the shelf stuff and easier N/A hp.

Only reason I'm running an RB20 is because that's what the car came with and it costs me nothing to spend hours fluffing around with it.

Also, I reakon the sound better, and that's half the fun!

http://www.youtube.com/user/jasestu#p/a/u/0/jpoqHb4CkAg

Good to see a few people with enthusiasm for the project :ermm:

For those who wanted to use a SR20ve... Have you seen any examples of people mounting them longitudinally (such as using them to replace a SR20de or RB?) From what I can tell, this is going to be much more expensive and difficult than building up a fancy rb20, but by all means prove me wrong.

As for expense.... it does build up quickly. Browsing through some of the gear, prices like $400 for valve springs, $1200+ for rods etc certainly make me stop and think. Maybe using a $100 wrecker motor bottom end is the way to go while developing the head.

The silva guys are going nuts with VE heads...maybe have a look on nissansilvia.com

have you thought about a VQ20? would be quite different, but not much off the shelf for them.

The silva guys are going nuts with VE heads...maybe have a look on nissansilvia.com

have you thought about a VQ20? would be quite different, but not much off the shelf for them.

If budget and requirements are met. Why not go a VQ35 - torquey engine and lots of N/A aftermarket support.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reading your posts Josh, sometimes I feel like I've gone in a time machine back to the 90's when everyone was doe-eyed and figuring things out for the first time.  I've lost track of how many single turbo GTR's I've seen on track that haven't burnt down lol. Everything has been figured out a long time ago. These things are at the point now where its essentially turn-key to go single turbo. 
    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
    • Ceramic coating and heat shielding, you mean?
    • Turbos don't require pulling the motor apart so that's "easier". I would recommend the Nismo R3 turbos instead if you want to do stock twin turbo. It doesn't make as much power as the 2530s but it's only like ~50 whp off the mark and should have better response (ball bearing CHRA, slightly smaller turbo). A local that went with a Garrett G30 and 6boost manifold recently nearly burned his car to the ground after the hood insulator started melting and and burning so if you go single turbo I recommend doing a lot of research and validation work to make sure you don't do the same.
×
×
  • Create New...