Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Can you guys help me make a purchase decision?

Have a R32 GTS-T and am doing SCCA Autocross with it, would like to do track days, about half my use of it and weekend driving. Bought new subframe and differential bushings and am wondering between two different things.

One of the issues i was having is some clunking in the rear which I attribute either to subframe or diff bushings. I want to get suspension, specifically swift springed BC BRs. Will be using near as possible to stock ride height because otherwise I would not be able to get in and out of my garage lol and if I lower it i would probably need more adjustment for my alignment than I can do stock.

The thing is though is other people were suggesting to me in buying basically what comes in this:

http://www.driftworks.com/driftworks-r32-suspension-kit.html

plus lower control arms or replace all suspension bushings. The bushings themselves are expensive and I would have to press them in possibly f**king shit up so I figured just buy new suspension components.

The thing is I get no clunking, uneven tire wear, or anything like that from any part of my suspension aside the area of the rear subframe. So is this really necessary at this stage? Or would I be better served getting coilovers and possibly sway bars? Stock struts are not blown. I know if I go one route or the other I will eventually want both. If you have any suggestions besides what i'm thinking please let me know.

Edited by Kanaric
  • 2 weeks later...

...

Thanks guys! I'm pretty sure there's enough thread left, I was mostly concerned about the shock travel with an (occasionally) fully loaded sedan.

Theory is though that with a 20% stiffer spring you'd have less travel over the same bump at the same speed than with the softer spring, right?

...

Just in case anyone else is looking at doing this, the BC BR 200mm front springs can definitely be used to replace the 220mm rears.

I've now gone from 6/5 combo to the BC BR default 8/6 with no issues so far.

I did this last week, it's straightforward enough. Seized lock rings gave me some headache and readjusting ride height all around takes a lot of time.

I also realised that the preloads were not consistent and have set that to 4mm all around now.

sounds great, if your car doesnt already have them maybe go for some poly bushings instead of stiffer springs? it would help reduce body roll and retain the good ride quality, plus its a maintenance item that you wont have to replace ever again

Interesting. I've changed virtually of the suspension arms bar LCA's but otherwise most bushings are OEM.

Curious to know how a poly bush would reduce body roll though?

2 things - if you're tracking the car def go the 8/6 spring combo, they're a bit harsh on street sometimes but quite liveable. I woyldn't want softer on the track myself.

Also the chassis bracing you mention - i poo-pooed alot of the bracing you see for skylines - until i actually tried it, and now i'm a huge fan. PM me if you would like any further info on that, its already been covered in threads on here.

So far very good actually, 8/6 is a touch more harsh on sharp bumps/corrugations than 6/5 but not massively, I'm quite impressed actually.

I'm currently running the 8/6 at 5 clicks from full soft, whereas with the 5/6 I used to have them at 10 clicks.

Keen to hear about the chassis bracing Andy if you can PM me some info please?

See this sounds messed up. Stiffer springs need more damping, not less.

Interesting, will need to play around with the settings. I would have thought that full rate of damping adjustment is somewhat acceptable for the default springs (being 8/6) supplied with the coilover? Is there a guide somewhere on matching damping to spring rates?

See this sounds messed up. Stiffer springs need more damping, not less.

The job of the dampers to control the bounce of the spring, and softer bouncier springs having more travel generally speaking (the primary concern being the damper being reasonably matched to the spring rate of course, neither will be giving optimum performance if completely mistmatched). The term 'reasonably' being applicable for a street/soft circuit car, we're not requiring Formulae Uno precision here. Softer springs can be offset to some degree by using a firmer damper to slow down the spring compression giving the 'feel' of a firmer spring. Conversely, a stiffer spring can be made to compress rapidly more easily when a softer damper is used giving the feel of softer suspension. This being easily evidenced by the wide range on adjustment on BC's, mine are only set a few clicks in and if the firmness of the damper is adjusted to halfway the increase is very noticeable; turn it all the way firm and it's like a bloody rock. Possibly granite or quartz, definitely not limestone.

Anyway not discounting your input but could you expand on that gtsboy?

  • Like 1

Yuh, a spring, a mass and a damper walk into a bar. No that's not how it starts. Um, a spring, a mass and a damper combine to form a resonant system. If you just hang a mass from a sporting and pull the mass down from its resting position and let go, it will bounce up and down and yup and down until all the energy you put in by displacing the mass downward (stretching the spring) has been dissipated by friction in the spring. Add a small damper to the system and it will absorb some of the energy on each stroke, this reducing the number of up down cycles and generally making the cycles smaller. This is the underdamped condition. Not enough damping to make the response of the system look much different to the unnamed system. Put just the right sized damper in (ie, a tuned damper rate, you can actually calculate it with the right formulae) and the response of the stem to the initial displacement is to shoot back to the starting position and not actually go past it very far before settling back to the initial position. Of you add in too much damping then the response is to return to the initial position more slowly and never actually overshoot the initial position at all. This is called overdamped. Overdamped systems are actually kinda common on cars, because a tuned system still feels a little too bouncy on cars.

Add more mass to the system with the same sized sporting and you need to add damper in order to meditation the same "tune". Add more showing worth the same mass and you also need to add more damper in order to maintain the same tune.

As has been said earlier(by yourself) people do use unbalanced setups to bandaid not having three right springs, but that doesn't make it the best choice of course.

Edited by GTSBoy
  • Like 1

Just a quick update on my BC BR's; I have just replaced my right rear shock just now as it started leaking, and previously replaced my left rear last year as it got super squeaky. Some more info here.

The left side lasted just under 20,000kms and the right let go just now at about 30,000km, both running 220mm 5kg springs on the sedan for all that time.

I'm not sure if it's the sedan or these coilovers specifically but the rears seem to wear out quicker than the fronts. The fronts seem to be going ok for now but I'll be keeping an eye on them.

  • 10 months later...

Thread resurrect.

What damper settings are people running with their BC BR's with the default 8kg front, 6kg rear springs? Specifically on the track.

Last time at Sandown I tried the following:

  • Session 1: Full soft, it was very floaty
  • Session 2: Full hard, very jittery on the crappy surfaces especially just before turn 2. Also the rear felt 'out of sync' with the front, not sure if that's because of the front heavy car?
  • Session 3: Front full hard -8, rear full hard -12. This was better - more cohesive - but didn't get a full sense as I had to cut the session short.

Those last settings were in line with the comments above that harder spring needs more damping, makes sense.

Next time I'll probably try front full hard, rear full hard -8 or something. The BR's have 30 levels of damping adjustment.

Bugger me.  I just read my last post in this thread.  What sort of auto-correct drugs was I on to make so many typing mistakes?

 

Back on topic, I think the last line of your post is close for a smooth track.  Nearly full at the front, a bit softer at the rear.  Have a fling and then try small changes, seeing as you've already done the gross changes and found what you REALLY didn't like.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

My current coilovers have finally died in the 32 and I want to get some BCs.

Any recommendations on where to get these? From what I can tell, it is now just JustJap in Sydney selling them? Shame that it is now up to $1399, why couldn't my coilovers die earlier....?

 

been on BCs (not my car) - felt ok...

I own MCA X-R with 10/7 spring rates and feels more planted and less bumpy than a set of BCs with 8/6

Also 32 adjustment on the BC vs 12... ain't no body got time for 32 adjustment points.. heck 12 is 4 too much.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...