Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Can you guys help me make a purchase decision?

Have a R32 GTS-T and am doing SCCA Autocross with it, would like to do track days, about half my use of it and weekend driving. Bought new subframe and differential bushings and am wondering between two different things.

One of the issues i was having is some clunking in the rear which I attribute either to subframe or diff bushings. I want to get suspension, specifically swift springed BC BRs. Will be using near as possible to stock ride height because otherwise I would not be able to get in and out of my garage lol and if I lower it i would probably need more adjustment for my alignment than I can do stock.

The thing is though is other people were suggesting to me in buying basically what comes in this:

http://www.driftworks.com/driftworks-r32-suspension-kit.html

plus lower control arms or replace all suspension bushings. The bushings themselves are expensive and I would have to press them in possibly f**king shit up so I figured just buy new suspension components.

The thing is I get no clunking, uneven tire wear, or anything like that from any part of my suspension aside the area of the rear subframe. So is this really necessary at this stage? Or would I be better served getting coilovers and possibly sway bars? Stock struts are not blown. I know if I go one route or the other I will eventually want both. If you have any suggestions besides what i'm thinking please let me know.

Edited by Kanaric
  • 2 weeks later...

...

Thanks guys! I'm pretty sure there's enough thread left, I was mostly concerned about the shock travel with an (occasionally) fully loaded sedan.

Theory is though that with a 20% stiffer spring you'd have less travel over the same bump at the same speed than with the softer spring, right?

...

Just in case anyone else is looking at doing this, the BC BR 200mm front springs can definitely be used to replace the 220mm rears.

I've now gone from 6/5 combo to the BC BR default 8/6 with no issues so far.

I did this last week, it's straightforward enough. Seized lock rings gave me some headache and readjusting ride height all around takes a lot of time.

I also realised that the preloads were not consistent and have set that to 4mm all around now.

sounds great, if your car doesnt already have them maybe go for some poly bushings instead of stiffer springs? it would help reduce body roll and retain the good ride quality, plus its a maintenance item that you wont have to replace ever again

Interesting. I've changed virtually of the suspension arms bar LCA's but otherwise most bushings are OEM.

Curious to know how a poly bush would reduce body roll though?

2 things - if you're tracking the car def go the 8/6 spring combo, they're a bit harsh on street sometimes but quite liveable. I woyldn't want softer on the track myself.

Also the chassis bracing you mention - i poo-pooed alot of the bracing you see for skylines - until i actually tried it, and now i'm a huge fan. PM me if you would like any further info on that, its already been covered in threads on here.

So far very good actually, 8/6 is a touch more harsh on sharp bumps/corrugations than 6/5 but not massively, I'm quite impressed actually.

I'm currently running the 8/6 at 5 clicks from full soft, whereas with the 5/6 I used to have them at 10 clicks.

Keen to hear about the chassis bracing Andy if you can PM me some info please?

See this sounds messed up. Stiffer springs need more damping, not less.

Interesting, will need to play around with the settings. I would have thought that full rate of damping adjustment is somewhat acceptable for the default springs (being 8/6) supplied with the coilover? Is there a guide somewhere on matching damping to spring rates?

See this sounds messed up. Stiffer springs need more damping, not less.

The job of the dampers to control the bounce of the spring, and softer bouncier springs having more travel generally speaking (the primary concern being the damper being reasonably matched to the spring rate of course, neither will be giving optimum performance if completely mistmatched). The term 'reasonably' being applicable for a street/soft circuit car, we're not requiring Formulae Uno precision here. Softer springs can be offset to some degree by using a firmer damper to slow down the spring compression giving the 'feel' of a firmer spring. Conversely, a stiffer spring can be made to compress rapidly more easily when a softer damper is used giving the feel of softer suspension. This being easily evidenced by the wide range on adjustment on BC's, mine are only set a few clicks in and if the firmness of the damper is adjusted to halfway the increase is very noticeable; turn it all the way firm and it's like a bloody rock. Possibly granite or quartz, definitely not limestone.

Anyway not discounting your input but could you expand on that gtsboy?

  • Like 1

Yuh, a spring, a mass and a damper walk into a bar. No that's not how it starts. Um, a spring, a mass and a damper combine to form a resonant system. If you just hang a mass from a sporting and pull the mass down from its resting position and let go, it will bounce up and down and yup and down until all the energy you put in by displacing the mass downward (stretching the spring) has been dissipated by friction in the spring. Add a small damper to the system and it will absorb some of the energy on each stroke, this reducing the number of up down cycles and generally making the cycles smaller. This is the underdamped condition. Not enough damping to make the response of the system look much different to the unnamed system. Put just the right sized damper in (ie, a tuned damper rate, you can actually calculate it with the right formulae) and the response of the stem to the initial displacement is to shoot back to the starting position and not actually go past it very far before settling back to the initial position. Of you add in too much damping then the response is to return to the initial position more slowly and never actually overshoot the initial position at all. This is called overdamped. Overdamped systems are actually kinda common on cars, because a tuned system still feels a little too bouncy on cars.

Add more mass to the system with the same sized sporting and you need to add damper in order to meditation the same "tune". Add more showing worth the same mass and you also need to add more damper in order to maintain the same tune.

As has been said earlier(by yourself) people do use unbalanced setups to bandaid not having three right springs, but that doesn't make it the best choice of course.

Edited by GTSBoy
  • Like 1

Just a quick update on my BC BR's; I have just replaced my right rear shock just now as it started leaking, and previously replaced my left rear last year as it got super squeaky. Some more info here.

The left side lasted just under 20,000kms and the right let go just now at about 30,000km, both running 220mm 5kg springs on the sedan for all that time.

I'm not sure if it's the sedan or these coilovers specifically but the rears seem to wear out quicker than the fronts. The fronts seem to be going ok for now but I'll be keeping an eye on them.

  • 10 months later...

Thread resurrect.

What damper settings are people running with their BC BR's with the default 8kg front, 6kg rear springs? Specifically on the track.

Last time at Sandown I tried the following:

  • Session 1: Full soft, it was very floaty
  • Session 2: Full hard, very jittery on the crappy surfaces especially just before turn 2. Also the rear felt 'out of sync' with the front, not sure if that's because of the front heavy car?
  • Session 3: Front full hard -8, rear full hard -12. This was better - more cohesive - but didn't get a full sense as I had to cut the session short.

Those last settings were in line with the comments above that harder spring needs more damping, makes sense.

Next time I'll probably try front full hard, rear full hard -8 or something. The BR's have 30 levels of damping adjustment.

Bugger me.  I just read my last post in this thread.  What sort of auto-correct drugs was I on to make so many typing mistakes?

 

Back on topic, I think the last line of your post is close for a smooth track.  Nearly full at the front, a bit softer at the rear.  Have a fling and then try small changes, seeing as you've already done the gross changes and found what you REALLY didn't like.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

My current coilovers have finally died in the 32 and I want to get some BCs.

Any recommendations on where to get these? From what I can tell, it is now just JustJap in Sydney selling them? Shame that it is now up to $1399, why couldn't my coilovers die earlier....?

 

been on BCs (not my car) - felt ok...

I own MCA X-R with 10/7 spring rates and feels more planted and less bumpy than a set of BCs with 8/6

Also 32 adjustment on the BC vs 12... ain't no body got time for 32 adjustment points.. heck 12 is 4 too much.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
    • 2630s work perfectly well. There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big. It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.
    • I've been building a 26/30 for a few years now. I've had the head built with all the good stuff. I had a 32 gtr but blew it up and yes its all going into a vl but im looking for some advice from some RB nuts on pros and cons on putting a 26 head on a 30 bottom end is it worth it Works are as follows Head -Extensive porting 1mm oversized supertech valves Supertech double springs Supertech valve guides Supertech titanium retainers Tomei solid lifters Tomei 270 x 10.25 cams Head drain Bottom end series 2 rb30 block Cp ceramic coated pistons Eagle rods Romac balancer Oil restrictions  O ringed blah blah spent a fortune And will get a girdle because the 30s arent used to handling that much rpm Nitto billet oil pump Hypertune plenum 6boost mani Refurbed astra pump thats the cover for it in the boot I did have a precision 6262 but sold it because drag car life. Currently building the ass end full 4 link floater rear end with a 2 speed  But the dilemma i have is my mate rekens I should just stick with the 30 head for reliability. Has any one had any issues with mounting the 26 head ie compression blowing gaskets etc. Just looking for some advice from people who have gone down this route. Here's some photos. Blew the oil pump in the gtr and decided to rip the motor out at the time and do a full build only to find it had been a repairable write off so went down this path.     
×
×
  • Create New...