Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

post-70948-1273048696_thumb.jpg

post-70948-1273048866_thumb.jpg

post-70948-1273048914_thumb.jpg

I had to include this pic even though it doesn't show the body kit :-)

post-70948-1273048987_thumb.jpg

lol...i would be easier to read the dials on the space shuttle at launch....still not sold on this kit.

but I WANT THAT F@$KING BONNET!!!!!!!........ :(

Correct.

LOL sorry mate, re-reading the thread and seen your reply.

Not a bad example that. Got a bit of street toughness about it.

----------------------------------------------------

HAHA M I K E that will get you in trouble :blink:

For the record I don't hate the M35. If your in the market for a wagon, you could do a LOT worse (damn, even that came out wrong)

The only thing I have against the M35 is the lack of a manual AWD version. Otherwise, I'm a big fan- I almost bought an Autech Axis 18 months ago, but ended up getting the V35s instead.

The bodykit on the car I posted is why I made this thread: why would you add square shapes to a curvy car?? It looks like something you'd find on "London Chop Shop", minus the dash made from MDF, thankfully!

Not a big fan of the Pond Premium:

STA-F.jpg

+1

Average lip spoiler doesn't even attempt to change the shape of the "smile" stock RS air duct.

That grill is rubbish and WTF is the badge on the bonnet.

Lucky it is cheap as hell :whistling:

  • 8 months later...

Yeah, yeah... old topic 'n all but I couldn't help posing it up here.

Two positive = 1 negative?

PM35 Nismo front bar looks nice on an M35 without flares

Axis kit (flares) looks nice

Put the two together with NM35 headlights (why didn't he change these when he did the bonnet?) and you get this half arsed result

NismoPM35onanNM35.jpg

NismoPM35onanNM353.jpg

NismoPM35onanNM352.jpg

05' Autech Axis S front bumper I think has some balls about it. I hate how everyone one thinks my

Axis front bumper looks PIMP. Not the look I was going for TBH.

Edited by Tonkachow

There's nothing wrong with that!....looks great's.....colour is awesome too!

Would even look good in a gay Pascal metallic blue....aye Cam!!! :P

lol... yep, that's why I did the conversion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Big single, and seqy. #sorted
    • The R32 suffers from an instrument binnacle that is uncomfortably close to the design of a VN Commodore's. But beyond that, the layout of the rest of everything, and the materials (ie the vinyl coverings on dash, armrest, etc) are acceptable, and the patterns on the fabrics are not as blergh as those in the R33. And R33 seats are....quite unattractive. I know it's only small details there, but I reckon the R33 got worse than the 32. But the big blergh is the overall shape of the dash on the R33. It's just has that whole Maxima/Pulsar sort of look to it. Nothing special at all. Generic Nissan sedan. Whereas, at least the R32 dash/binnacle was different. Less a wide expanse of boringly curved plastic. More a "cockpit" sort of look, even if nowhere near to the degree that the A90 Supras got. R34 seats look good on their own, until you realise that they are indistinguishable from the shape and fabric on 70 other Japanese cars. And the foam bolsters on them suffer even worse than the earlier cars. Other than that I don't really have an opinion the rest of the R34 interior. I took the bits of the R34 I wanted (brakes and engine) and added them to the best external appearance Skyline in the modern era (the 32). So nyerr!
    • Can I be your first customer? I would like hard lines done for the fuel system, 8AN up and 8AN back and the underside wire wheeled and coated (brush or sprayed) with that black tar shit.
    • Speak for yourself, I love the R33 interior. 32 is blergh. I like the 34 interior too. Then you start getting much newer in most cars and they all turn back to blergh. 馃槢
    • 500-600hp into a RB is already 'sinking endless amounts of money' into an engine. Especially a 30 year old engine. Unfortunately this is the RB Game. Considering stock power (or at least stock components) will do ~360whp on 98 by simply turning up the boost on the stock gear on a RB26, that would be where I'd say the cutoff point for "sinking endless amounts of money into the engine" Cause to even do this reliably you'd probably need to replace all the bits anyway cause they're old, starting your sinking journey anyway. I reckon the least painful way is rebuilding the engine to make 50hp over stock lol. The 'plan your ownership around a rebuild' was a common saying 15 years ago.
  • Create New...