Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Was constantly worrying about my car's exhaust getting EPA-ed since i am always moving in and out of the city pretty often, and truely recieved one just a couple of days ago. :D

I don't wanna keep worrying about getting EPA-ed nor do i have the time to waste going around to clear the EPA.

I am seeking help or recommendation for an aftermarket exhaust system which would pass EPA, and something that i can stick on my car for good. And preferably also a workshop that i can get it fixed. Am located in North Melb.

Am not really worried about performance, would like a nice tone that will clear EPA without having to swap out to the stockie. So any recommendations will be much appreciated :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/319524-recommend-exhaust-for-r34-gtt/
Share on other sites

This has been covered MANY times. I had an R34GTT and ran a Fujitsubo Legalis system. It was great for power and passes EPA also - I know as I had it done. I was running 3" from the turbo back too and still passed :D

http://www.nengun.com/fujitsubo/legalis-r

Looked nice enough too -

2471023_2.jpg

I'm sure there are local systems around though. Others will comment.

adzmax.

thanx i saw your recommendation on that in previous threads, but that was a couple of years ago.

am unsure if new systems are out :D

anyway thanks, have a few questions regarding that and will direct it into your mailbox.

Fujitsubo 3" turbo back is what I got n what most r34s come over here with from what I've seen. They r nce n mild and will pass EPA unless ur unlucky like me n get tested in an underground carpark lol but yeh definatly get that

Wow, I like your car, very clean and well styled. +1

This has been covered MANY times. I had an R34GTT and ran a Fujitsubo Legalis system. It was great for power and passes EPA also - I know as I had it done. I was running 3" from the turbo back too and still passed :P

http://www.nengun.com/fujitsubo/legalis-r

Looked nice enough too -

2471023_2.jpg

I'm sure there are local systems around though. Others will comment.

Trust PE2, very quiet on idle and cruising (and thats 3" turbo back)

Very nice note when flooring it. Looks good as well.

.

would it still be quiet at 4800 rpm?

thats what rev we need to be at and measured for EPA

most people would recommend a pe2 for its quiet yet nice bark on load, but i would definetely recommend somehting bigger and less restrictive for a 300kw+ setup if thats wat ur looking for.

if you a size 8 shoe, you buy a 9 to let yourself grow into them. same rule applies for modified cars.......for me at least.

Hi Jap Muscle~

I don't have a 300kw+ setup, mine is stock :thumbsup: Not looking to readily modify the car as of yet, due to time restriction.

other than a 3" turbo back piping with a 5" cannon at the end. I failed the noise emission because when backing off the accelerator it echos off the 5". so right now, something nice and would meet legal requirements would be splendid for me :thumbsup:

anyway UPDATES for the thread,

have gave themufflerman a ring, and set a date to go down on wednesday... will be back to this thread for updates :blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...