Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

FFS dont put a s14 cradle in a 32. what a waste of time. get a non-hicas s13 (w. r200 4 bolt pattern) subframe buy some riser bushes foam fill the frame and put it in. Will all bolt up and will correct your suspension geomatry, no point going s14.

No the S13 subframe is identical to a non-HICAS R32 subframe.

The S14/R33 onwards have the revised frame with the modified anti-squat. It's the angle of the LCA which determines this; not the diff angle. The diff ango will make no difference whatsoever to suspension geometry.

No the S13 subframe is identical to a non-HICAS R32 subframe.

The S14/R33 onwards have the revised frame with the modified anti-squat. It's the angle of the LCA which determines this; not the diff angle. The diff ango will make no difference whatsoever to suspension geometry.

yeah but how many 32's around have no hicas... very limited. no point putting a s14 or 33 frame in the back, unless a company brings out a solid riser ofset bush, i think powered by max will in the near future.

yeah but how many 32's around have no hicas... very limited. no point putting a s14 or 33 frame in the back, unless a company brings out a solid riser ofset bush, i think powered by max will in the near future.

I dont get you.

There clearly is a point... For the anti-squat. That's the whole reason for doing the subframe swap in the first place! The difference is like night and day. I've done it back to back on a circuit S13.

Plenty of companies make offset spacers for the conversion. PoweredByMax aren't pioneers in this field by any means...

hey Dave only reason I was considering doing the S14/R33 was because I found these:

http://www.splparts.com/SPL_SSB_S13C.html

duno if u realise thats a very expencive option. $200us for bushes a subframe would be like 80-100 bux bare. then u got solid diff bushes ontop adjustable arms if u dont have them, the list goes on.

if u got the cash by all means.

if anyone is keen on doing the s14/33 option i have a 33 subframe w. diff if keen. (BNE)

Edited by 32_Dave

Well..I mean I have a limit on how much I'm willing to spend, both ideas do seem good.. but in this case the price difference isn't going to be huge for me because either way i need to buy a new subframe and bushes.. so for me now it comes down to the best option.. so s13 or s14

Edited by 30edR32
Well..I mean I have a limit on how much I'm willing to spend, both ideas do seem good.. but in this case the price difference isn't going to be huge for me because either way i need to buy a new subframe and bushes.. so for me now it comes down to the best option.. so s13 or s14

well for bolt up reasons and price reasons s13.

pros:

can use all items off the 32 subframe

cons:

purchase of adj toe arms

otherwise s14 is the better option.

pros:

beter geom

cons:

would have to buy a dressed subframe (diff, lca etc etc)

more expencive bushes

diffrent diff

solid diff bushes

purchase of adj toe arms

if u have big rims, they will stick out more.

why u think i said go s13? sumed up the above thats why i went s13, and modified the subframe.

there is a point... and that is to maximise the handling available... thats why you'd upgrade to a s14 cradle.

get bushes made by a machinist and its not so expensive after all.

not expencive if u already have all the other parts, bushes are the least of worries.

whats a fully dressed s14 or r33 subframe worth? and even then chances are all the arms are stock.

rad32.. from what I understand yes this can be done to a 32 hicas subframe.. but it's a better option to go with s13 non hicas if you have already locked your hicas.. and yeah pretty much just because there are a lot more s13 non hicas subframes than 32's

Next is correcting the same thing for the front end. You drill your front Lower Control arm (LCA) upwards. See pic 6 Then the only thing left to correct is your tie rods, simply buying new tierod ends can fix this. See pic 7

Picture 6:

IM000776.jpg

Did you also raise the castor rod mount the same amount?

I thought you have to do both?

Did you also raise the castor rod mount the same amount?

I thought you have to do both?

me personally no didnt need to. but a mate of mine has, he did math to work it out, not just same amount as a riser bush.

so in what way are s14/r33 different...more anti squat or less anti squat. Im asking as some ppl on here are saying that s14 gains traction because it has more antisquat. Im confused. It actually opposite?

Simon u say u get more traction therefore i assume s14 has less anti squat design in the frame than s13/r32. But if u think about it by raising the frame right up in the nose ur increasing antisquat = less traction. Cancelling out what the frame has built into it. If u do this to a s13/r32 that means even more anti-squat = even less traction.

But then again, it is correcting roll centre which is the main aim I suppose. I wasn't sure when i did this to my 33 frame so i kept the front of the frame in the original position and only raised the rear. to gain more squat for traction. havent tested it at the track yet.

Has anyone tried different angles of the subframe for traction gain? is it worth worrying about.?

Thats why some solid bushes come with slip in spacers as subframe raisers create more antisquat. for eg http://www.splparts.com/SPL_SSB_S13C.html

Edited by drf76

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Dissimilar metal corrosion. Aluminium is less noble than steel/iron, and will corrode preferentially when in contact with it and a conductive solution (ie, wet road salt). Tends to suggest that those brackets should be made in steel for a shitty climate like the UK.
    • Here is picture of the rear brackets again seeming to have eating itself or corrode or whatever. Can’t describe it , hope someone could explain this    
    • No i am in the uk so maybe road salt etc but checked rear and same story where handbrake cable seems to have eaten part of the bracket. Have emailed alpha omega waiting for reply
    • I've not looked at a GTR without the booster there. Is the hole and mount on the firewall not just the same as GTSt? I would have expected it to be. Nissan don't change panel stampings if they don't have to, and you'd think they'd just order/design the booster to mount to the same place.
    • They have all sorts of "failure" modes. When they are brand new, the can either be very very tight, or reasonably mobile. If they are reasonably mobile, you'll probably have a good start. If they are very tight, then they can catch/grab at every little motion, and they mark the ball or the outer race, tearing off whatever teflon lining is in the outer race, then they can rapidly degenerate from there. If they get wet, they can just rust. They are just steel and will turn red pretty quickly. Water can get in behind them and sit and cause them to become crunchy and then proceed to tear themselves up, as above. Same with grit and dirt. Manufacturers and OEMs of the arms that use them will tell you that because they are teflon lined (well, the good ones, anyway), you shouldn't grease them. If you do grease them, then the grease will catch any passing grit and dirt and hold it in place where it can cause damage. Race teams that have them will lubricate them thoroughly. They will also inspect them every 5 minutes and replace them every 10 minutes, if need be. Some manufacturers of arms will provide dust boots. These can help, but they are seldom perfect, and sometime just make the situation worse, being a place where crap can collect. I have made nappies for some of mine with PVC sheet and race tape, to try to minimise the access of crap. When they wear, you can get a tiny tiny amount of movement between the ball and the outer race. This will make clicking noises. It will also make the arm have "slop" in that the tiny amount of movement available at the inner end of an arm can cause a lot of movement out at the outer end. 0.05mm at 5mm from the pivot becomes 4mm 400mm away from the pivot. If they are too tight and binding, they impede the proper motion of the suspension arm and put loads into it and the rest of the suspension that are not supposed to be there, and can cause failure. Think broken welds, broken threaded sections on the adjustable parts, mounts ripped off the chassis, etc. All of these are possible, which is the main reason why they are essentially illegal on the road in Australia.
×
×
  • Create New...