Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday,

Ive looked around and cant find

iacspring.jpg

Can someone explain how to access the return spring inside here ?

(this isnt my exact one, took this picture off another site)

Basically i pulled this off my car to clean the valve ect.. and noticed that the tension on the spring wasnt the best.

I am looking at either re-tentioning it, or replacing the spring...............HOW ? -- Because the diaphram doesnt close all the way and i think its causing higher idel (1200-1400 rpm)

I've tried a screwdriver in there to force two bits of the sping apart further... but cant get it enough so i would have to pull it out..

Can someone explain how to remove it ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/319849-aac-vavle-spring-aac-internals/
Share on other sites

Yes tried that, but when I took off the solenoid;;; I could not pull the spring/ plunger/ piston out of the aac device.

Used long nose pliers to no avail,

I was thinking perhaps the other side,

there seems to be some kind of cover and the spring stuff it moulded in there. - it may also just be a sticker,,

can you confirm if I just use more force it will slide out ?

Cheere

Yes tried that, but when I took off the solenoid;;; I could not pull the spring/ plunger/ piston out of the aac device.

Used long nose pliers to no avail,

I was thinking perhaps the other side,

there seems to be some kind of cover and the spring stuff it moulded in there. - it may also just be a sticker,,

can you confirm if I just use more force it will slide out ?

Cheere

Im right with you on this also. I was considering picking out the brown filler that is in there that seems to hold it all in. I think my spring is also weak and needs replacing. My idle is pretty crap, ECU just doesnt seem to take control of it very well.

I have a lathe. I was even thinking of putting my valve in the lathe and carefully "turning" out the brown stuff.

At the end of the day, it would probably work out faster and easier to get a whole other assembly from a wreckers for ~ $100-150, rather than playing with that one.

I'm all for the DIY route and will try wherever possible to repair parts, but some times you have to just admit defeat haha.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...