Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Castrol type r racing, 5-30w, compare the back of that pack to a genuine nissan oil, the castrol will ****ing beat the nissan 100%. As for filters, I'd bet you $30 that they are rebadged shit from taiwan or somewhere, just keep popping in repco filters every service and your laughing, oh, and I change oil every 5000.

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why do you think higher oil pressure is better? I used Castrol synthetic for around a year (5000km drain interval) and it ended up blocking a lifter. Look up the comparisons of synthetic oils, the wear properties of Castrol is average at best. You can buy better for the same money (Motul, Mobil, Fuchs, etc).

I just replaced my oil with Castrol Magnatec 10W 40 and a repco filter and the car seems to run much better. Ive decided to just move thru all the different types of oil that people recommend. 1 down, 20 to go.

On a side note, my car sits on 1/4 pressure at idle and up to 3/4 at full.

ne1 thouht of using a slightly thinker oil an jus putting a higher capacity sump on ur motor if ur gonna give it a belting....thats wat i do..works fine presure anlwayz stays good...bout half an i neva have 2 worry about not being ne oil there 2 pump up...can ne tell me if this is actually the right way 2 go about it..???? thanx

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 years later...
  • 7 months later...

Bit of a bump. Since it hasn't been explained properly, the viscosity of the oil is one of the most important factors when deciding which oil to use.

Newer engines use thinner oils because they have much smaller tolerances than older higher mileage engines. As rings, bearings, lifters etc wear these tolerances become larger, and a thicker oil can be used to take up the gap and reduce wear that would be caused if a thinner oil was used.

Viscosity is a little tricky to explain, but I'll try to make it easy.

For an oil to be classed as say a 5W oil, it needs to be able to flow a certain amount at a low temperature. This first number is the oil's "cold" viscosity.

The standards for measuring oil viscosity are determined by the SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) and all engine oils use the SAE's standards for measuring viscosity.

The "W" suffix simply means that the oil is suitable for use during winter, meaning the oil will not become too thick under the lower overnight temperatures (usually only oils with a cold viscosity of 20 or lower will be classed for winter use, although I have seen a few 25W oils)

The second number is the oil's "hot" viscosity. This is a little harder to explain. Multigrade oils contain polymers which react under heat, and actually expand as they become hot. This is what prevents multigrade oils from becoming too thin under hot conditions. That's all well and good, but what does this second number have to do with that?

If you were to warm a monograde 40 weight oil to a high temperature (I say high temp because I'm not sure myself what temperature they measure the oil viscosity at), it would be thinner than a 15 weight oil at cool temperature.

So, if you were to test a 15W-40 engine oil, it would have the viscosity of a monograde 15 weight oil at it's low temperature, and when warmed up it would have the viscosity of a monograde 40 weight oil at a high temperature.

Hope that makes sense.

Edited by Lupes
Bit of a bump. Since it hasn't been explained properly, the viscosity of the oil is one of the most important factors when deciding which oil to use.

Newer engines use thinner oils because they have much smaller tolerances than older higher mileage engines. As rings, bearings, lifters etc wear these tolerances become larger, and a thicker oil can be used to take up the gap and reduce wear that would be caused if a thinner oil was used.

Viscosity is a little tricky to explain, but I'll try to make it easy.

For an oil to be classed as say a 5W oil, it needs to be able to flow a certain amount at a low temperature. This first number is the oil's "cold" viscosity.

The standards for measuring oil viscosity are determined by the SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) and all engine oils use the SAE's standards for measuring viscosity.

The "W" suffix simply means that the oil is suitable for use during winter, meaning the oil will not become too thick under the lower overnight temperatures (usually only oils with a cold viscosity of 20 or lower will be classed for winter use, although I have seen a few 25W oils)

The second number is the oil's "hot" viscosity. This is a little harder to explain. Multigrade oils contain polymers which react under heat, and actually expand as they become hot. This is what prevents multigrade oils from becoming too thin under hot conditions. That's all well and good, but what does this second number have to do with that?

If you were to warm a monograde 40 weight oil to a high temperature (I say high temp because I'm not sure myself what temperature they measure the oil viscosity at), it would be thinner than a 15 weight oil at cool temperature.

So, if you were to test a 15W-40 engine oil, it would have the viscosity of a monograde 15 weight oil at it's low temperature, and when warmed up it would have the viscosity of a monograde 40 weight oil at a high temperature.

Hope that makes sense.

Yes that make sense.

I was told that, with R32's, since they are older cars, "Back in the day", the engineers only had mainly Mineral Based engine oil hence that's why they used mineral based oil while designing the car...

If this is true, is there any point putting in a Fully Synthetic based engine oil in a older car..?

This relates back to your 2nd sentence... So is it OK to use Fully Synthetic based engine oil or would it be BETTER to use the Mineral Based engine oil..?

  • 3 weeks later...

The only problems I have heard of with swapping from mineral oil to synthetic oil is that some synthetic oils contain more detergents which remove carbon deposits from within the engine, which can potentially create leaks as the deposits can act as sealants to old gaskets etc. The other thing you need to think about is viscosity of course, because most synthetic oils are low-viscosity, running thin oil in an old engine will usually result in the engine burning off the oil between changes.

If the engine has been looked after previously you shouldn't have much of a problem, and I would always choose a synthetic over mineral in a rebuilt engine (with an exception to the running-in period)

Edited by Lupes
The only problems I have heard of with swapping from mineral oil to synthetic oil is that some synthetic oils contain more detergents which remove carbon deposits from within the engine, which can potentially create leaks as the deposits can act as sealants to old gaskets etc. The other thing you need to think about is viscosity of course, because most synthetic oils are low-viscosity, running thin oil in an old engine will usually result in the engine burning off the oil between changes.

If the engine has been looked after previously you shouldn't have much of a problem, and I would always choose a synthetic over mineral in a rebuilt engine (with an exception to the running-in period)

Yeah sure...

Others have said to me the similar things you just said.

Thanks for that buddy!

  • 2 years later...

Yes that make sense.

I was told that, with R32's, since they are older cars, "Back in the day", the engineers only had mainly Mineral Based engine oil hence that's why they used mineral based oil while designing the car...

If this is true, is there any point putting in a Fully Synthetic based engine oil in a older car..?

This relates back to your 2nd sentence... So is it OK to use Fully Synthetic based engine oil or would it be BETTER to use the Mineral Based engine oil..?

^This is something i have been told by a few people in the tuning/performance industry.

Given that the RB26/25/20 is an old motor(s) designed in the 1980's when oil technology was nothing like what we have today, I see no reason why a good quality mineral oil of the correct weight and changed regularly (5000km) will not provide good long term protection for an RB motor.

However as soon as you change turbos (specificaly roller/ball bearing) you are adding a much newer component built and designed around much newer/better oil technology. At this point i would say yes you do need to move on to modern semi-synth/full synth oils.

But as I change oil at <5000km service intervals, I figure the oil doesn't get to the point of breaking down and failing to provide proper protection. As such I dont see any need to buy top priced oils which are developed to work better over longer periods of time.

I put the new penrite hpr stuff, extra 10 full synthetic. I get a much more comfortable oil pressure with this than I did with the every day stuff. I used to use expensive oils but it really is a waste if you just drive the car as a daily IMO. $40 a bottle too. Used to cost me almost double before.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just don’t be silly enough to think it’ll never happen either 
    • I take it that you bought the centre to suit the GTR axles? As in there was a plan, not just somehow lucky that it worked? It all looks excellent, by the way.
    • New engine block time. Up to you whether you want to keep going down this road with this project. Unfortunately a lot of these cars are like this. The road to getting these cars into decent shape is long and not fun for reasons that you're discovering. 
    • Essay time. First things first, an RB running stock turbo and boost levels shouldn't get so bad as to stall from reversion if the recirc valve has been deleted. Should get a little fluffy and annoying, but in my experience, not so bad as to stall. Of course, every car is a bit different, so it remains possible that stalling will happen. So, running with no recirc valve is somewhat of an option, for otherwise stock stuff. Atmo BOVs cause all sorts of shit, even on an otherwise stock setup. Only gets worse the higher the boost and the bigger the turbo. At that point you really need to go for a different ECU and no AFM. Rebuilding the stock recirc valve configuration is not hard. You just need a stock or aftermarket BOV with the appropriate adapter for the 2 bolt flange on the back of the J pipe, and to get/make an appropriate ~1" pipe to get the air back to the turbo inlet, and to possibly modify the inlet (if it is not stock) to take the recirc pipe back in. Not hard. Just takes some cutting and welding. Putting an R35 type AFM into the car anywhere is not as simple as just buying the AFM and throwing it in. You will also need to buy the appropriate boss that will then need to be welded onto the pipe where you're installing it. You can clearly see why by looking at the photo posted above. They are not a "simple" swap for a stocker. You can't put on in place of the stock AFM. You can put one in place of the stock AFM, if you get the mounting boss and weld it to some pipe and otherwise make that pipe piece work like the stock AFM housing. Or you can buy such an adapter, either complete with the 4 bolt flange for the air box, or without, for varying degrees of work needed to then make it fit your stock airbox or some pod filter or whatever you have going on. Oh, and the R35 AFM is not plug and play. The wiring is different, but changing that is trivial. The plug is also different so you either end up repinning the original wires onto the new plug, or you just use a short adapter. If you weld a boss to the cold side pipe, the cold side pipe really wants to be 3", otherwise the scaling on the meter can get a bit weird, but whatever the pipe size, it's not as easy as just using the (fully documented in the Nistune doco) simple method for choosing R35 AFM in X" pipe size in the software, because the scaling will already be a bit different. Anyway, all of this has been comprehensively worked through on the Nistune forums, so there is full knowledge available. I would use a Link/Haltech before I would bother putting an AFM into a cold side pipe. That's a lot of effort for a bodge. Nistune is great, can work well even at fairly high power levels, but you are stuck with the limitations of it being the stock ECU, which includes needing to use an AFM, which is not always convenient for every set of modifications. You have to have a think about what you already have, what you want to have, and decide early if you'd be better off jumping ship to an aftermarket ECU. This so you don't waste time and money doing things 2 or 3 times. Never heard of ECUmaster. Sounds like a backyard operation. If there are good tuners for it where you are, and it is a solid product, then it will be fine. We're only talking about an R engine here. Back in the day they all ran on crude nasty early 90s ECUs and they were fine. You don't need a rocket surgeon's ECU to run one.
    • So left off with high hopes of having a gearbox in pretty quickly........ Got the adapter plate that week and had to chase a few threads and work out how/where everything goes as no instructions. Got the adapter fitted, test fitted gearbox and found had to cut and shave a few things. Tunnel required some hits with a decent hammer to give some clearance on passenger side but it fits with no problems,  could fit a 8hp70 with a little more work. For a cross member I wasn't going to spend $1100 on so shiny machined piece. Went through a few designs and remembered I had a gktech s chassis to cd00# cross member. Fitted that and found its close enough with a few extra bits welded so have gone that way and still a work in progress.  After this got into modifying the intercooler with some bends and clamps. I was procrastinating on this as was not keen to cut up and weld it myself but happy with the outcome.  Onto the radiator shroud and oil cooler mount. This thing took way longer than I thought it would but having to add an extra oil cooler for the trans and wanting everything within the chassis rails its good enough for now. It mounts to the chassis and gives plenty of room for lines and pipes. All the coolers are rubber mounted and sealed the shroud on the top and sides, will use some tape to seal the bottom gap of about 10mm. 20250508_111500.mp4   Next job was to build the new diff and after a delay with a friend got built this week. I ended up putting it all together with supervision and was good to learn how to set one up correctly. I ended up going a 3.69 ratio, nismo 1.5 way gt pro with gtr Axel's. Stripped it all down, gave all the parts a good clean, pressed on new bearings and set backlash. Was good working in a clean assembly room with all the gear. Once got home wire wheeled the case and hit it with some rollbar/chassis black paint. Got a few more bits done but will leave them for the next update.
×
×
  • Create New...