Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys n girls,

Im selling my pioneer cdj 1000 mk3 cd turntables. they are about 1 year old and are in very good condition.

Both have been kept in a roadcase and stay at home. Never been out of my room.

Very reliable. they are still the club and industry standard and preferred cd turntables.

I am looking to get $2300 for the pair or sold separately for $1200. (I bought them for 1800 each a year ago)

They have both recently been serviced and work great.

They do not make this model anymore but djwarehouse still have them for almost $2000 each so i think my price is reasonable.

The cdj 1000's are now a part of cdj history and any dj starting out or continuing would love to have them.

I still have original box and booklets to send them out or get them picked up in and with all cables that came in the box.

PM me or call me on 0422464760 for more info.

my name is Robbie

pics will be up later tonight.

P.S I also have a denon s3000 cd turntable for sale that was recently serviced. It is great for scratching as it has the active platter function.

they dont make this deck anymore either and it is one of the first active platter cd players ever released.

Denon is a top brand and you cant go wrong if you love your cd turntables and love to scratch on them.

I am looking at around $450 for this cd turntable. bought it 2 years ago for $1400

Edited by R34-2NV
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320499-2xcdj1000-mk3-pioneer-cd-players/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
now willing to sell the dns 3000 with postage for $400

let me know, like i said its in good condition

if you can do it for $350 i'll take it.

ive got them on ebay mate but for some reason i cant post new threads on inthemix forums.

yeah i know they are cheap but people really dont look to pay for what things are worth these days and are always out for a bargain so i guess thats why ive put them up for so cheap.

ive got them on ebay mate but for some reason i cant post new threads on inthemix forums.

yeah i know they are cheap but people really dont look to pay for what things are worth these days and are always out for a bargain so i guess thats why ive put them up for so cheap.

yeah you need 50 post before you can post in for sale on inthemix.

wish i had the cash i want to get some of these before they phase out.. my cdj800s are getting boring and old...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
    • Yup but for me its the HR ! Cut my teeth on the old holden 6s in the day ! And here's me thinking in the day it was also the 300ZX and the Mitsubishi GT3000 ! All, as well had good lines, but always seemed to need finishing off, style wise.
    • A 180SX has a much better look than a FD. The roofline is far superior being a fastback. It's popups look better. In a world where we all subconsciously add a little bit of low, and wheels of our preference, it's just more handsome than the FD is. The FD just looks 'bubbly' in comparison. It can come down to preference, sure. But "The FD is the BEST looking (on appearances alone) 90's JDM car without question?" Nah. Plenty of questions lol. I could think of 8 cars I think look fundamentally better, and probably a handful of ones that look about on par with a FD. (like say a SW20 MR2) I feel people like/overrate the FD because of it's mythicality/rarity, its rotary and it's unpredictable nature. It probably drives great, you can stuff a ton of tyre under there, has a unique sound, light as hell. I feel that people reading this thinking "YOU CANT RATE A 180 ABOVE A FD BECAUSE A 180 IS A CHEAP DRIFT BUCKET" prove the point about bias as to what the car represents, moreso than how it actually looks.. I feel the 80's boxy/squared off look is becoming better looking due to time, and 90's melted soap bar aesthetics have not aged well. (yet?) And this thread is purely about looks :p
    • A red or yellow S15 wins my vote, Ack that it just scraps in with the 90's cars theme, but they are great looking little sports car Next would be a A80 Supra (pre face lift), whilst the A80 has its own issues, I feel is the best looking larger GT car As for the FD, "I" feel that the reason it triggers me in a non-positve way when looking at one, is like looking at a high maintenance pretty girl who you know is mentally unstable and likely to explode for no apparent reason
×
×
  • Create New...