Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, just been reading a bit on LPG and finding websites stating the minimum RON of LPG is around the 99 mark, which got me thinking whats stopping most skyline drivers from jumping on the LPG band wagon, 50-60c/L fill-ups sound like a godsend to me, not to mention the higher run would technically equate to better performance no? sorry if this is a stupid question im just genuinely interested (thats what sitting on a computer all day at work does to ya! :()

thanks guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320588-why-dont-we-run-gas/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Mainly because Even the very best LPG systems dont support big HP...and the fact that there isnt much room to mount tanks in the car...and oh...LPG is for Taxis :(

ah ok, so the limiting factor would be injectors or? lol i wouldn't mind sacrificing my boot for that kind of saving at the bowser! must admit i would feel like a complete knob-jocky grabbing that lpg pump at the servo lol

i read an article some time ago that stated that injectors where the biggest hold up, however some mob claimed to have fixed this problem.

I think its an issue of fuel density and injector speed... but it was a looonnnggg time ago.

ah ok, so the limiting factor would be injectors or? lol i wouldn't mind sacrificing my boot for that kind of saving at the bowser! must admit i would feel like a complete knob-jocky grabbing that lpg pump at the servo lol

i did the math a while ago and to run 350kw you needed 18 of the largest LPG injectors that were on offer. not to mention a computer capable of controlling all 18 properly.

hey guys, just been reading a bit on LPG and finding websites stating the minimum RON of LPG is around the 99 mark, which got me thinking whats stopping most skyline drivers from jumping on the LPG band wagon, 50-60c/L fill-ups sound like a godsend to me, not to mention the higher run would technically equate to better performance no? sorry if this is a stupid question im just genuinely interested (thats what sitting on a computer all day at work does to ya! :()

thanks guys!

Propane (the better gear) only yields about 86% of energy per volume of petrol but is partially compensated by the higher stoich of 15.6:1.... so it always yields lower results... ie a step backwards.

Tank pressure is the biggest issue, much like nitrous a lpg tank needs to be stabilised temp wise to deliver consistent pressure otherwise your mixtures change with the seasons or days etc... simply dangerous for high output engines. Much has been done lately to alleviate these issues including running fuel pumps inside the LPG tank and a pressure regulator. Currently around 700hp is the sensible limit of these kind of liquid injection systems Normally Aspirated

There was a thread in here a while back about a GTR being converted to gas.

Also there's one semi regular forum member in Sydney with a stagea on gas. The tank is where the spare wheel goes so it's not that bad

There was a thread in here a while back about a GTR being converted to gas.

Also there's one semi regular forum member in Sydney with a stagea on gas. The tank is where the spare wheel goes so it's not that bad

until you get a flat that is :(

like i said, not looking to do it myself but was just wondering, yea the stag gas driver is was prompted the rare brain activity during work :banana:

lol it is sorta a good point, why does noone do it.... but when my brain thinks any further then that i just think

"skyline filling up with LPG and running on LPG, :( thats not right"

like i said, good point but i wouldnt want to do it to my skyline and i dont know many others that would either lol just seems wrong

from the top of my head there are a few reasons why. LPG injection systems were a bit behind the times for a long while, only recently are there decent fuel delivery methods to deliver a pressurised gas into a internal combustion application.

the other reason as prev stated also is the availability, fitting and weight of the gas cylinders required. This has changed recently with composite cylinders becoming widely used and affordable. nowadays you can get a torus shaped cylinder which will fit in your spare wheel well.

so all in all, a lot of the reasons why lpg was never used in the past have now been solved, the old ideas are still prevalent though which explains why not many people use it.

lpg has a higher effective octane rating which means higher compression/boost/timing can be run.

the cost per litre is also cheaper, although balance this out with the fact that lpg is less energy dense (energy per volume) than petrol, along the same idea as how larger injectors are required to run e85 (since its less energy dense than petrol, requiring more to support the same power levels).

the ongoing cost savings are there, if you can work your head around the setup, then it may be a worthwhile idea.

My R34 GTT is dual fueled, and paid for it self in about a year. like previously said the main problem is Line pressure and the tuning to make it work, esp with a vapour sequential injection set up like mine.

1 work around is to run dual gas lines, dual convertors and dual injectors. (highly ugly and impracticle).

Liquid injection is 10x better, no gas convertors, constant fuel pressure as there is a pump in the gas tank and alot less wiring. and allot higher power capabilities.

another trick is to trigger the gas computer to revert back to running on petrol once a set rev or load point is hit.

regards

Chris

If you had a modified N/A skyline you could get it to run gas no problem. And make a few extra KW with the liquid injected systems.

I was looking into these with a modified Falcon i use to have but the cost of the conversion put me off. Was about 5k from memory.

Gas injection is old skool. I've heard the XR6T boys are having great results with liquid LPG injection. Thanks to boyle's law it makes more power than 98, and the effect to especially beneficial on forced induction engines due to the heat added by the compressor. The biggest problem for them is limited supply of the kit making it difficult to source. I havent looked into it myself - all this info is second hand.

Gas injection is old skool. I've heard the XR6T boys are having great results with liquid LPG injection. Thanks to boyle's law it makes more power than 98, and the effect to especially beneficial on forced induction engines due to the heat added by the compressor. The biggest problem for them is limited supply of the kit making it difficult to source. I havent looked into it myself - all this info is second hand.

power has never been a problem, its mixture stability thats the main issue and those new "fandangled" liquid injection systems you talk of are still having injector freezing issues at high hp.

attached is the 700hp engine i was talking about aerlier on the engine dyno, running a aeromotive 1000 pump and in tank and regulator, ecu compensation for pressure is clearly seen on the fuel rails.

post-34927-1273813076_thumb.jpg

if its problem is with big hp, wouldn't a fairly stock GTS-T a duel fuel setup of gas for general light driving and 98 for some heavy fun be a ideal setup? im a absolute nub at the workings of LPG so im obviously missing something as it still feels like a win-win in my books

the extra weight will hurt the performance big time.

if you really wanna got for cheap fuel convert to E85 or even have the car detuned to run on 91 ULP.

or keep the 5k and whack a Gt3037 Pro S on the car

like i said, by no means am i looking to go gas on the liner, was just curious if their was a viable technical reason for the lack of gas powered sports cars and thats been explained fairly well :banana:

out of the 3 their i definately know what my young impressionable mind steers towards :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
    • Well, hydraulic lifters will get noisy if they are dirty/fouled in some way, and exactly how that manifests will depend on exactly what schmutz is where. There is a procedure on here somewhere for dismantling and soaking/cleaning them. Replacing them with new is about 50% of the work and about 5% of the money!
    • Thanks for the reply @GTSBoy this is is a hydraulic lifter engine. Yea right i did not realise the lifters were supposed to be compressible while installed. I could push them down but i had to lean almost my while body weight on them.  I have never heard of a lifter/ lifters ticking only at hot idle and getting worse the hotter it gets. I have owned a few jdm cars with noisy lifters. This noise is slightly more subtle, it is more of a sharp gentle metalic tic than the solid and more loud tapping I've heard on lifters. I have used a metal rod, alloy tube, hose and stethoscope and could not find the source of the tick. But it appears to be loudest on the actual engine block behind the exhaust cam gear and next to the oil filter. I had mate (40 year old mechanic) go over it with me and he couldn't find it either..  Could it be a cam seal issue of some sort?  Cheers  
    • This seems problematic and unlikely at the same time. Vanilla RB2Xs have hydraulic lifters. They do have "zero" clearance, but only when running with oil pressure inside them. When not running, you should be able to compress them and obtain heaps of clearance. RB26s and Neos have solid lifters. They should have ~0.3mm and ~0.5mm on the inlet and exhaust respectively. If they have zero clearance then bad things are happening. With nothing else being wrong, it would mean that the valves would be held slightly (ever so slightly) open when they are supposed to be closed and it should have all sorts of problems when running, caused by leakage in/out through the valves. Or, zero clearance can indicate severe valve seat recession. None of it is good. Have you used a piece of hose as a stethoscope to try to localise the noise?  
×
×
  • Create New...