Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well like I said its got a different wheel for greater flow instead of response.

I'll be driving this car for a while before I would be comfortably building it for any one in case of any problems. If this works out well we will be able to do that to all OP6 turbine housings.

For the time been we will still be carry with standard and .82 rear ended PU high flows.

i think the result is impressive and on par with alot of 3076 results.

its making nearly 200kw at the 4000rpm mark which is well and truly on par, and it ramps on nice. considering the final output is also near enough to 300kw, for something that will bolt on and be very close to stock like appearance, i think we have a few too many whingers in this thread.

please take note of my reference to the words 'i think' and note that it is my personal opinion that you are whingers, to which i am entitled :cool:

lets not forget the value either!

LOL! this power is unbeliaable guys. Soon this turbo will be on mine! Guys Tao took me for a drive in this with the turbo on and it was just AMAZING! it was so torquay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sure it wasn't queenscliff?

Another Dr-Drift dyno run cut off early...rev it harder Sam :ninja:

They are still nosing over after 5500 though stao...badly

Stao's rear tires are not the 'grippiest' and we have been fully booked out... I was just doing him a favour and squeezing in a few runs to see if we could monitor and control boost. If this was a full tune we would have certainly strapped it in, played with with cam timing, etc etc...

ok fair enough then :P

As said about though, it does look a little lazy coming onto boost..but that could just be the ramp rate aswel.

Ramp of 13kph/s

Awesome results, but i'm really concerned about the manifold pressures. I want to know if you guys are monitoring the manifold pressures whilst holding the gate closed with the actuator stopper? im worried about excessive pressure doing damage long term (exhaust valves and rear turbine).

Agreed, I've had many discussions with Stao regarding going beyond what I recommend, and to his credit he's prepared to push the limit, learn along the way, and try new ideas. I would certainly not recommend anyone to push these turbos, or any turbo to their limits, without carefull monitoring and understanding of vitals.

Sam.

This version of PU high flow plus the SS-2 prototype is an example of pushing few factors to its limit in exchange for the most out standing response, and power.

First time you've ever seen 295rwkws with .63 turbine housing holding straight 18psi to red line with internal gate, or 250rwkws with 18psi < 2500RPM of a SS-2 right?

Experience, Materials, workmanship, knowledge, data, and engineering define certain extension of limit. There are no full definition of limits, and nothing is physically impossible. So we'll keep cracking.

Also we've done lots of researches and evaluations in parts and components that made up those 2x turbos that takes the edge. I will evaluate it for 100,000KMs with some data analyse. If every thing turns out in great order as expected then I will have no holding back and let our customers enjoy the benefit of the new concepts.

First time you've ever seen 295rwkws with .63 turbine housing holding straight 18psi to red line with internal gate

bombtrack got 297 with an I/G hks 2835 (.68) with drop in cams on an unopened RB25 on pulp on the chasers dyno... that's pretty close :)

First of all Good work.

I've personally seen this turbo before it was installed. Since Stao does not want to reveal the wheel sizes, its a 500HP rated CHRA in a .63 turbine housing. Which we've also seen Garrett GT3582 600HP CHRA in .63 turbines.

The exhaust manifold pressure and flow keeps the shaft spinning providing desired boost level. Any lose of exhaust manifold pressure or flow will result in boost drop. So wither you run a adjustable internal gate or an external gate, at 20psi the manifold pressure does not change.

If the components of the turbo is built to handle 20psi with decent tune then I don't believe it would cause any problems.

Edited by kwickr33

Pressure and flow are two different things altogether, The less exhaust manifold pressure the better.

As pressure builds up it fights against the spinning turbine wheel causing it to slow, hence boost drop off and high temps

The exhaust manifold pressure and flow keeps the shaft spinning providing desired boost level. Any lose of exhaust manifold pressure or flow will result in boost drop. So wither you run a adjustable internal gate or an external gate, at 20psi the manifold pressure does not change.

They are not talking about a drop in exhaust manifold pressure (that is what a wastegate effectively does to hold a consistent boost level). They are discussing too high exhaust manifold pressure caused by restricting the wastegate movement

Pressure and flow are two different things altogether, The less exhaust manifold pressure the better.

As pressure builds up it fights against the spinning turbine wheel causing it to slow, hence boost drop off and high temps

Actually as pressure builds in the exhaust manifold it pushes the turbine wheel faster and harder (this is why if we run a turbo without a exhaust manifold pressure release aka wastegate then turbos will run almost unlimited boost)... It also pushes harder back on the engine which is what is causing some people concern.

Actually as pressure builds in the exhaust manifold it pushes the turbine wheel faster and harder (this is why if we run a turbo without a exhaust manifold pressure release aka wastegate then turbos will run almost unlimited boost)... It also pushes harder back on the engine which is what is causing some people concern.

I know what you are saying there, but if the pressure cant escape fast enough (too much pressure in the turbine hosuing itself) than it will slow, due to the exhaust gas almost coming to a standstill because it has no where to go.

Which comes down to the turbine exducer sizing, dump pipes, wheel trims etc.

I cant see the exhaust gas coming to a standstill, it would be near supersonic. I see it as maximizing the turbo as the turbine will be at its maximum shaft speed. Yes it would be better to go to a larger housing but you pay the penalty of lag and that affects the best part of the powerband. How often are you at 7000 revs anyway?

So how much pressure is too much and how do you measure it? Perhaps it is good when the stock wastegates drop boost.

Yeah you can't see what the back pressure is doing by looking at a dyno plot - sometimes it can show up as the power falling over prematurely due to the tuner having to pull timing to avoid detonation before MBT. Funnily enough this dyno plot looks like what you could expect to see in that case, if it weren't for the claim that the early drop off is due to wheelspin. Silly rolling road dynos...

Will be interesting to see how it goes on a hub dyno, and how the engine/turbo lasts at that power level if its going to be used on the track at the power level at all?

At face value, very nice power level and spool for a convenient and affordable package :D

Didn't Mafia make over 300wkw with a .63a/r GT3076R?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Howdy friends, So another weird one today, I was looking into replacing some broken clips holding the front grille for the R32 GTR (part number 01553-03831), and noticed the brackets which are supposed to hold the grille in place were also missing 😑. I do recall seeing this issue many years ago, but didn't fix it at the time. A quick look on eBay and I was able to find the genuine brackets, along with all the screws which suited the headlights (part numbers 26042-08U05,26092-08U05). Happy days!....  Once they arrived however there was an extra nut in the packaging which implied that there should also be a bolt or a stud, and sure enough, after a bit of searching I found this thread from 2013, and @Ants clearly shows a stud should be present. Reading around a bit more, it's possible the headlights on my car are the "povo pack" headlights as mentioned by @funkymonkey in this thread way back in 2008. This could explain why the studs are missing on my set of headlights. Looking at the headlight diagram I wasn't able to see a suitable part number for the stud itself. The headlight did indeed have a recess that looked like it would accept a stud, but interestingly no thread or anything obvious how the stud would be affixed to the headlight, I suspect it may have been glued in, press fit, or melted into the plastic at the factory. Another member may be able to clarify if they happen to have a genuine set of N1 headlamps. The only thing we have to work with within the recess is a keyway which likely is there to prevent the stud from rotating within the recess. In any case, back to 3D printing, I put together a model which acts like a pug with a friction fit inside this recess, making use of the keyway so it doesn't rotate while tightening a bolt. Printing in TPU will allow it to slightly swell making a nice snug fit without cracking the part. I've designed the adaptor it to accept an 20 mm M6 bolt (stainless with a cap head in my case), as opposed to the standard M5 stud and I made use of the standard galvanised split washer that came with the genuine brackets from Nissan. Once the bolt and screws were all in place, giving the bracket a gentle shake gave the classic "shaking the car" feeling, very solid, which gives me confidence this is going to be able to hold on much better than the janky solution which seems to have been here for the past decade or so. Overall I'm really pleased with how this turned out and maybe there are more people out there running these headlights without a centre stud at all! Link to the freely available model on Printables: Click here Regards, Sean  
    • Hey everyone, This is my first post apart of the introduction. I tried searching a bit on the forum but couldn't really get a straight answer. I got the car to my mechanic as I felt it being weak. It seems that it was missing on two cylinders due to the injectors. I had all my injectors clean and the car runs much better. The mechanic also confirmed my suspicions that the cat is clogged and needs to be tackled asap. The cat rattles a bit and the hot exhaust warning frequently lights up when driving after getting the injectors clean. In my introduction I was asked about what modification I might be interested in and mentioned a cat delete. From what I was told, this is not really beneficial on the RB20DE and there are more cons than pros.  Could perhaps anyone give some suggestions on what the best course of action would be since the current cat is toast and needs to be removed/replaced anyway? I can also sometimes smell a strong smell of fuel, but I'm not sure if this is related.
    • Hope the cans went down well at least 
    • 255 can't go wrong with the price.
    • When I was replacing my pump due to being stranded in the wrong state, I went with the Deatschwerks 320lph kit. It is a direct plug in to the stock wires, harness, everything. It comes with a plug... but you can plug the OEM plug directly into this thing. https://justjap.com/products/deatschwerks-dw300-fuel-pump-nissan-s13-silvia-r32-r33-r34-skyline-c34-stagea?currency=AUD Downside: Won't actually flow that much on boost if you want to push it on E85, but it's comparable to the 040/255 etc. Little more actually.
×
×
  • Create New...