Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys, its time to come to rebuild the motor.

the path i am going is to rebuild the 25 block with 26 internals (crank/rods/pistons - i manage to score the bottom end for real cheap so its a cheap way to stroke it & be stronger at the same time)

now i need info from ppl who has done this and what complications they came across if any or any help/tips that they can provide.

I've searched on sau, skyline owners & google and have seen a few ppl do it with success but there were really no technical answers, just yes it will fit but like anything there is always a hurdle to jump over.

the head ill be using will be a R34 RB25 Neo which should work fine. Would the pistons clear the valves & not smash them?

RB25 stroke: 71.7mm

RB26 stroke: 73.7mm

difference in stroke is 2mm so would i assume that by adding 2mm thicker headgasket will make things clear or am i wrong?

parts list include

R33 GTR crank

R33 GTR rods with arp bolts

ACL 86.5mm pistons

cometic head gasket (not sure on size?)

any help much appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/321488-rb26-crank-in-a-rb25/
Share on other sites

hi guys, its time to come to rebuild the motor.

the path i am going is to rebuild the 25 block with 26 internals (crank/rods/pistons - i manage to score the bottom end for real cheap so its a cheap way to stroke it & be stronger at the same time)

now i need info from ppl who has done this and what complications they came across if any or any help/tips that they can provide.

I've searched on sau, skyline owners & google and have seen a few ppl do it with success but there were really no technical answers, just yes it will fit but like anything there is always a hurdle to jump over.

the head ill be using will be a R34 RB25 Neo which should work fine. Would the pistons clear the valves & not smash them?

RB25 stroke: 71.7mm

RB26 stroke: 73.7mm

difference in stroke is 2mm so would i assume that by adding 2mm thicker headgasket will make things clear or am i wrong?

parts list include

R33 GTR crank

R33 GTR rods with arp bolts

ACL 86.5mm pistons

cometic head gasket (not sure on size?)

any help much appreciated.

i would assume you are thinking about using GTS-t pistons?...the easy way is to just use RB26 pistons as the pin height is correct but you will have to run a thicker than std head gasket as the NEO chambers are smaller. Should be able to work out the static comp on paper and you will be able to see the difference each size head gasket makes.

Edited by Swiper the Fox

I too am looking into this after reading an article in HPI. A member on SAU "GTS-t VSPEC" from the WA Section has done it, I have gotten in contact with him via pm, here is a bit of info he has supplied;

We took the easy way out and used an R34 GTR crank an then used oversize pistons to give us 2.7L. Its amazing that more people don't use GTR crank, pistons and rods as they're virtually a straight fit.
The R33 GTR crank is fine, but you'll need something like the JUN Crank Collar to avoid the chance of damaging the oil pump (the R34 cranks have a better attachment to the oil pumps).

You could go standard RB26 pistons, but then of course you'd only get the standard stroke. For the money it's hard to go past forged pistons, probably just 1mm oversize.

I think my headgasket was 1.2mm, but for me it was important not to drop the compression ratio too low, as the 9:1 ratio on the 25's is pretty much perfect.

Mind you, I was asking about stroking the RB25 into a RB27, not sure this info applies to the NEO, as I was reading somewhere recently that there is something smaller on the head...however don't quote me on that.

I too am looking into this after reading an article in HPI. A member on SAU "GTS-t VSPEC" from the WA Section has done it, I have gotten in contact with him via pm, here is a bit of info he has supplied;

Mind you, I was asking about stroking the RB25 into a RB27, not sure this info applies to the NEO, as I was reading somewhere recently that there is something smaller on the head...however don't quote me on that.

Yes...as stated above the chambers are smaller...hence the static comp. increases as an engines chamber cc decreases.

Most of the parts are interchangeable.

As swiper said, use the rb26 pistons (or forged pistons to suit an rb26) as they have a different pin hight to allow for the longer stroke.

You can use the rb25 rods as they are the same length and bearing size, but the rb26 rods are stornger.

rb25 balance and crankshaft cambelt drive pulley fit the rb26 crank but you need to buy the rb26 crank balancer bolt and washer as they are a differnt size thread.

rb25 flywheel/clutch will fit the rb26 crank.

Only clearance problem i had was the oil squirter cut outs in the pistons were not big enough, 10min with a die grinder and that was fixed, but i believe that was just the brand of pistons i used.

Cheers

NutR33

It'll only give you 2.7 because of the over bore. If you have a standard bore it will be exactally the same displacement as a standard RB26 as both the 25 and 26 have an 86mm bore.

Just wondering why it was said that the R33 crank would need a crank collar. I was under the belief that it was only the 89-92 RB26 cranks that had the short oil pump drive?

Yes 26 stroke is longer than 25, The reason why you end up with an 2.6 is using stock bore size.

Only difference between RB25 and 26 block is the head stud size, VVT oiling and lower block face for the 4WD sump basically everything else is the same give or take a few castings for the Twin turbo oil drains, and oil grooves under main bearings etc.

Fantastic news, thanks for all the info guys.

Sorry i should've mentioned that i'm going to be using RB26 pistons not RB25 :D

AFAIK as well the R33 GTR onwards had the longer nose crank so won't be needing the crank collar, is this correct?

he R33 GTR crank is fine, but you'll need something like the JUN Crank Collar to avoid the chance of damaging the oil pump (the R34 cranks have a better attachment to the oil pumps).
- this might be a printing typo as i've researched and only early R32 GTR cranks need it.

Technically it will be stroked so it brings the cc up to around just below 2.6 just like a RB26.

By my calculations an 86.5mm bore and 73.7mm stroke gives 2598cc capacity .

I believe many consider 87.5mm the bore limit on an RB block and with this and the RB26 crank stroke the capacity is 2659cc .

At 86 by 85 the RB30 comes out at 2962cc std . If your states legislation allows don't you think this would be an easier way to go ?

If you only spent money on two areas in an RB30 - crank collar and coated std piston crowns the build would still be reasonably affordable .

A .

Definatly keep the 25 and throw the 26 rotating assembally in it. Correctly preppared and assemballed the 26 gear is good for 400rwkw, is lighter than a 30 rotating mass and cheaper/easier if your building a motor anyway.

Also crank collars are so cheap- you might as well have on installed.

Shot peen the rods and intall arp bolts.

Ceramic coat the piston crown and teflon coat the skirt.

Any you'll end up with a really nice, inexpensive bottomend.

Definatly keep the 25 and throw the 26 rotating assembally in it. Correctly preppared and assemballed the 26 gear is good for 400rwkw, is lighter than a 30 rotating mass and cheaper/easier if your building a motor anyway.

Also crank collars are so cheap- you might as well have on installed.

Shot peen the rods and intall arp bolts.

Ceramic coat the piston crown and teflon coat the skirt.

Any you'll end up with a really nice, inexpensive bottomend.

sounds like the old bottom end that Paul used to run 10.3's with. 450+ though

Edited by Red R Racing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...