Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

:ninja: Hi All,

Just boosted my stock turbo on a R34 RB25 DET with neo head, stock boost was around 7-8 psi, after installing a turbosmart boost T we have boosted pressure to 14 - 15psi, say 14psi. The problem we are having now is that on full stick the engine rpm winds to 5000 rpm, pauses for a while then winds out to 7000 rpm nicely. Any idea what might be causing this slight pause at 5k under hard , full acceleration??

The problem seem to be possibly heat related as on the 1st run it seems find but on the 2nd , 3rd and 4th run the problem occurs, possibly the timing adv., sorry no dyno in Samoa

Help apprecaited.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/321528-boosting-stock-turbo/
Share on other sites

u need to get the car tuned, the revs will develop alot more smoothly and flat spots will be gone

does the boost stay 14psi across the whole rev range? no spiking?

wind the boost down to 10psi, u wont make much more power on anything more than this unless its tuned

there is a good chance you are getting close to, or hitting the ecu airflow protection. there are only 2 solutions to this. 1 is cheap, the other expensive. the cheap one is actually free. simply wind the boost down to 12 or 13psi. the other option is a new ecu.

the other thing is that (from what i am aware) the stock mapping of the r34 ecu's is somewhat.... what is the word i'm looking for here..... conservative through that part of the rev range.

Are you telling me that more boost is not better?!?! :D

A car with 15psi will always beat a car with 10psi... :):D

Is that a serious comment lol? Because if so, i suggest you read this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Cl...on-t321471.html

Contrary to popular belief, psi does not equal power... Volume equals power

as has been mentioned

R&R is being hit

Ohh and at that boost you will destory the turbo prettty quickly.

I got my nistune done at the same time as upping the boost. 11-12psi is plenty enough for the stock turbo, and on the neo motor should make over 200rwkw without too much trouble assuming proper supporting mods.

Is that a serious comment lol? Because if so, i suggest you read this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Cl...on-t321471.html

Contrary to popular belief, psi does not equal power... Volume equals power

it does to a large extent when talking about altering the boost on 1 turbo, but not if changing between 2 different sizes. on the stock turbo between 10psi and 14psi there is probably a 20 or 25kw difference in power. i know from what i have personally seen on a dyno with back to back runs the stock r33 turbo will make around 20kw more at 16psi than it does at 12psi. if it wasn't for the ceramic exhaust wheels on the skyline turbos everyone would be running them at 15psi, and there wouldn't be this mass of incorrect information about where the stock turbo runs out of power. people don't run them at 15psi because they are fragile (and because the stock ecu chucks the shits), not because they won't make any more power.

it does to a large extent when talking about altering the boost on 1 turbo, but not if changing between 2 different sizes. on the stock turbo between 10psi and 14psi there is probably a 20 or 25kw difference in power. i know from what i have personally seen on a dyno with back to back runs the stock r33 turbo will make around 20kw more at 16psi than it does at 12psi. if it wasn't for the ceramic exhaust wheels on the skyline turbos everyone would be running them at 15psi, and there wouldn't be this mass of incorrect information about where the stock turbo runs out of power. people don't run them at 15psi because they are fragile (and because the stock ecu chucks the shits), not because they won't make any more power.

Ok let me rephrase that, psi is not the only thing to consider when making power. They may still be making power by 15psi, but run a stock turbo at 40psi and see how much more power you are creating. They simply don't flow enough. Flow is starting to run out by 14psi, and you won't see as much of a power increase anymore, which is why it is not worth the risk of blowing your turbo. The increase of power from 7psi to 10psi is greater than the increase of power from 14psi to 17psi. If psi is what produced power, then even a stock turbo run at 40psi should be making insane power, even if it blows up in the process.

Don't get me wrong, psi does obviously have something to do with power output, i'm just saying that it isn't the only thing to take into account. A car run at 15psi will not necessarily beat a car running 10psi.

Edited by Hanaldo
Ok let me rephrase that, psi is not the only thing to consider when making power. They may still be making power by 15psi, but run a stock turbo at 40psi and see how much more power you are creating. They simply don't flow enough. Flow is starting to run out by 14psi, and you won't see as much of a power increase anymore, which is why it is not worth the risk of blowing your turbo. The increase of power from 7psi to 10psi is greater than the increase of power from 14psi to 17psi. If psi is what produced power, then even a stock turbo run at 40psi should be making insane power, even if it blows up in the process.

Don't get me wrong, psi does obviously have something to do with power output, i'm just saying that it isn't the only thing to take into account. A car run at 15psi will not necessarily beat a car running 10psi.

you've either got it wrong yourself or you've just worded it wrong.

-a standard turbo wont run out of flow at 14psi

-id argue ur statement of 7-10psi making more of an increase in power then 14-17psi on a standard turbo giving in mind that the ecu isnt hitting R&R and the turbo doesnt blow. dont know exacly but id say the gains would be very similar.

-same 2 cars, same 2 turbos and setups. more psi = more power unless its already running out of puff then u further increase the boost which i dont think anyone would do anyways (not a 5psi increase anyway)

-u say a car @ 15psi wont beat a car @ 10psi, if they're identicle and not hitting boost cut or anything then it will. if its a different turbo then its a different story. 12 psi out of a standard turbo isnt the same as 12psi out of a 3076.

to the OP. wind the boost down. yes your car will run better at around 10psi rather then 15psi and u wont be hitting R&R

you've either got it wrong yourself or you've just worded it wrong.

-a standard turbo wont run out of flow at 14psi

-id argue ur statement of 7-10psi making more of an increase in power then 14-17psi on a standard turbo giving in mind that the ecu isnt hitting R&R and the turbo doesnt blow. dont know exacly but id say the gains would be very similar.

-same 2 cars, same 2 turbos and setups. more psi = more power unless its already running out of puff then u further increase the boost which i dont think anyone would do anyways (not a 5psi increase anyway)

-u say a car @ 15psi wont beat a car @ 10psi, if they're identicle and not hitting boost cut or anything then it will. if its a different turbo then its a different story. 12 psi out of a standard turbo isnt the same as 12psi out of a 3076.

to the OP. wind the boost down. yes your car will run better at around 10psi rather then 15psi and u wont be hitting R&R

May have worded it wrong. I don't know the exact figure a stock turbo runs out of puff, but it does run out is what i am saying. Which is what i mean when i say psi is not everything you need to take into account. I didn't say anything about the exact same setups. Of course if the cars are identical then psi is going to make a difference, but that is because the turbos flow the same as well. Psi is psi, doesn't matter what turbo is making it. But 1L of air compared to 2L of air is different.

Is that a serious comment lol? Because if so, i suggest you read this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Cl...on-t321471.html

Contrary to popular belief, psi does not equal power... Volume equals power

It was supposed to be sarcastic! Guess I used the wrong pics haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean this in no disrespect to u mate; Are there clear tagged examples/explanations in our SAU forum for example, in my interest, this is how to do R34 Gtt suspension the right way? U guys did so much taking risks with experimentation that deserves recognition and those results helps us morons take the RIGHT path to buy quality / buy once. 🍻
    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
×
×
  • Create New...