Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pic0000.jpg

Japanese Muscle Car

All Aggressive!

pic0000.jpg

Stream line with a tough look!

pic0000.jpg

IMO The shape of the head lights made it loose it's "Angry" look and went an all rounder everywhere else.

Yet the R33 GTR can still pull off a strong stance.

Just got to do it right.

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

they all look great!

i prefer the 33 interior/dash over the 32 by far. and thats a deal breaker for me.

back when i had little knowledge of skylines, and no bias, i looked inside a 32 and went 'eeew dude, no way'.

but........ now i appreciate them all.

Edited by Munkyb0y
Owned a R34 GTR VSPEC gunmetal grey with garrett gt2860-5 turbos, power FC....greatest car ever.

Sold that and after a year....got a R33GTR VSPEC. Great in it's own way.....R32GTR maybe a little dated now.

And came with twin hi mounts....HKS To4R. HKS forged internals.

All are nice and most people end up buying 33 over 32 mainly because of age. Like someone mentioned before the interior of the 32 is a huge turn off. And 33 is seriously the best value for money with the brembos, revised gearbox etc.

Anyway I'm not a huge fan of the 33 to begin with but it grew in me after owning one.

Never owned a 33, but in the end, there is nothing wrong with the 33GTR.

I've seen some beauties, just have to be careful what wheels you fit due to there being so much room in there!lol.

nzm031

yes it was GOD_Speed

i dunno if it's terry's son though. no clue!!!

but yes - that IS the GTR i was talking about! good spotting... that is probably up there with being one of my favves on this site!

If we take the GTR guise out of all of these models. Does it change your views?

The most common comment in here is "it's still a GTR" the differences in styling, performance and features greatly differs when you consider the GTS-T etc platforms.

Edited by hylian

well ive owned a 33 gtst and now a 32 gtst... and for me.. the 33 was the better "car". i used it on the weekends... and it was a nicer place to be and the nicer car to drive than the 32.. everything was much cleaner and tighter.. and i felt less embarassed driving it places.. it was epic clean, sounded great and looked great and i didnt have to worry about it, reliablity wise.. all the buttons worked.. all the lights lit up.. it was great.

r34 gtt's look rubbish... hate everything about them... love the 34 gtr's though.

i have a 32 now to make a track car.. but if i was going to have a weekend car again i would be going the 33 route.. gtr or gtst.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
    • Dort sounds above 3k rpm are dorty 🤣 I might krinkle black the alloy 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...