Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The front mount will be fine. Doesn't really have any effect on your emissions.

RED513 is right on the money. Cat and o2 sensor checks and you'll be right to go.

Unless you have drastically changed the amount of fuel (injectors) or air (turbo), then you have no need for an aftermarket ecu. (for emissions, of course. Always power benefits from a tune! :rofl2:)

The front mount will be fine. Doesn't really have any effect on your emissions.

RED513 is right on the money. Cat and o2 sensor checks and you'll be right to go.

Unless you have drastically changed the amount of fuel (injectors) or air (turbo), then you have no need for an aftermarket ecu. (for emissions, of course. Always power benefits from a tune! :rofl2: )

nah only mod is fmic and exhaust had pod but put standard airbox back on

how do i know if the cat thats on there is good enuf

  • 1 month later...

hey guys had car emissions tested and it bombed out real bad so im thinkin of just doing what the tuner said and get the aftermarket ecu but he also said that nistune will not have the paremeters that i need 2 get it to pass

any one know where i can get a power fc

or does any one know anything about microtech as they are in my area and will install 4 1400

nistune and power fc are very similar, just the power fc has more resolution in the maps. nistune will do fuel & ignition, closed loop corrections, after start / cold start and acceleration enrichment, what else do you need to get a good tune to pass emissions. microtech are alright, but its not an ecu i'd be picking, especially for an emissions pass.

Get another tuner! Nistune will tune your engine fine. When you say bombed out on emissions test what was the problem? Do you have any numbers, readout? Did you replace the cat convertor? With an almost standard car its ridiculous to be telling you that you need a Microtech.

Get another tuner! Nistune will tune your engine fine. When you say bombed out on emissions test what was the problem? Do you have any numbers, readout? Did you replace the cat convertor? With an almost standard car its ridiculous to be telling you that you need a Microtech.

ive got a read out here somewhere ill have to scan it and post it and no i didnt change the cat the exhaust place said they only put cats on that meet australian standards and yeah the tuner is saying power fc but i think h just wants to try n make some extra money out of me wants 2 charge me 2500 then tuning on top

try and find out what make the cat is

x-force cats are notorious for their poor performance (both power and emissions wise)

catco and metalcat are supposed to be good tho

and x2 on the nisstune being as good if not better for emissions

have you changed your o2 sensor while you have owned the car? if not, replace it asap its probably the main reason it failed the test cos the ecu can't see how rich its running

Actually a "lean" tune will fail the IM240 test.

The tune must be such that the levels of CO, hydrocarbons, and NOx gasses are all within regulations.

A lean tune will fail just as hard as a rich tune will.

As quoted above, it's not about how filthy rich your tune may be but the gases that are created by the combustion of O2 and fuel.

It is imperative that you have a catalytic converter that is able to convert the gases into other gases that aren't measured in the IM240 test.

This is why decat pipes are illegal and carry a hefty fine for emissions.

hey guys had car emissions tested and it bombed out real bad so im thinkin of just doing what the tuner said and get the aftermarket ecu but he also said that nistune will not have the paremeters that i need 2 get it to pass

any one know where i can get a power fc

or does any one know anything about microtech as they are in my area and will install 4 1400

you know what i think about this bloke man, just get nistune!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...