Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I couldn't care less who actually wins,,,Well thats not actually true GO THE BLUES,,,I just want a great game,,,but can that shit broadcaster stop showing replays all the bloody time. None of us are dummies,,,we can see whats bloody happening. Checking out the coaches/runners/the crowd and going back all the time with replays makes for a really crappy telecast. Then again I shouldn't expect quality media coverage from Channel 9. Stupid me.

Neil.

hate to say i told you so but...

:)

I am shocked and appalled at this discovery that you are a QLD fan..

I know where u live sir.. so one day, you wont know when but it will happen. I will place my NSW flag ever so carefully that you cannot reach it or remove it.. You will need to move house and VICTORY will be mine!

I am shocked and appalled at this discovery that you are a QLD fan..

I know where u live sir.. so one day, you wont know when but it will happen. I will place my NSW flag ever so carefully that you cannot reach it or remove it.. You will need to move house and VICTORY will be mine!

I'll have your "Senior's Card" ready for you :)

(just had to wiki what qft meant matt lol)

I am shocked and appalled at this discovery that you are a QLD fan..

I know where u live sir.. so one day, you wont know when but it will happen. I will place my NSW flag ever so carefully that you cannot reach it or remove it.. You will need to move house and VICTORY will be mine!

As am i?!?!? Terry how could you!

Honestly, i'm not surprised QLD won. From the moment they scored their first try it was game over, purely because QLD earned the points..NSW got a lucky bounce.

The whole reason QLD dominate the origin is because of their halves. Thurston and Lockeyer (as much as i hate to admit it) are 2 of the best, if not the best halves in the game. They control the team around the park, and when they have the ball, they make things work for them.

In my opinion, Kimmorley shouldn't have been included in the team. He's getting on, and hasn't done anything to wow me at club level (i'm a Dogs supporter). Lyon is good, in the right combination.

And someone seriously needs to tell Hayne what his position is. He was the reason for 2 of QLD's tries because he committed to an inside player and they beat him with skill. And WTF was with that pass to no where when he regathered that chip kick from Lyon????? As Phil Gould said (as much as i think he's a knob), if Hayne was playing for Parramatta and that happened, he would've run it, put on some foot work, and potentially scored. And he made a good point that it clearly displayed the difference in confidence levels between the NSW and QLD sides.

I honestly think, unless NSW change something dramatically, QLD will take the series and make it 5 in a row. And they would deserve it.

I agree with what you say widow. the qld backline is one of the best ever assembled and with lokyer and thurston calling the shots they had weapons for any situation.

The blues coninue to make the same mistakes by relying on a gun forward pack to try and dominate. Not good enough when the opposition has strike weapons that can hurt you from any where on the field. particulalry when the forwards start to tire.

One glimmer of hope for the blues was the inclusion of Israel girly haircut man later in the game. He has the guns to turn a game.

Will be keen to see if he gets a run on spot for game 2.

Idris apparently can't maintain anything over 30mins of game play as his fitness levels aren't as high as they should be (I've heard) so they just bring him out half way

is that at club level?

why do they play him then at origin level? boggles my mind

is that at club level?

why do they play him then at origin level? boggles my mind

Are you serious????

Being a Dogs supporter, i'm shocked, and i guess disappointed in that. Mainly because, how can you have someone playing top level football, who can only last 30mins? I understand he's a big guy and it would more than likely be tougher on his body than most....BUT...there should be some kind of expectation for NRL players in terms of fitnesss

Are you serious????

Being a Dogs supporter, i'm shocked, and i guess disappointed in that. Mainly because, how can you have someone playing top level football, who can only last 30mins? I understand he's a big guy and it would more than likely be tougher on his body than most....BUT...there should be some kind of expectation for NRL players in terms of fitnesss

i suppose that's what impact players with 'x factors' are supposed to do.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...