Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi all

i did a search before but forgive me if this has already been asked.

i currently have sumitomo HTR ZII all round on my car

they are forward directional, but also inside/outside specific

dont want to get into a tyre debate here lol

i have a bit of inside camber wear going on...so what i need to know is

can the tyres be flipped from side to side, putting the *outside* on the inside...to even up the camber wear?

obviously the tyre has been designed that way for a reason but i was just wondering how much difference it actually makes.

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322654-directional-and-side-specific-tyres/
Share on other sites

got the same tyre on my car.

i flipped the rears didnt notice any diffrence but in the wet they might not be as good?

cheers mark

i might just give it a go, its either that or get new ones so might as well.

I run tyres backwards on the rim often in the race car, in the dry, there is no noticeable loss of performance

However I think you are mad to do the same on a street tyre. There are 2 key things that are different - as Mark said the wet performance suffers because the tyre is not designed to pump water in the direction you are running it. Also it is possible the internal construction may have a problem running backwards eg steel belts loosening.

If it was safe to run these tyres backwards the manufacturer would say so - they only use assymetric or directional design when they have to to meet a certain performance goal.

On a related topic....what is your wheel alignment (camber and toe, front and rear)? If it is out you are better to address the problem than throw new tyres at it.

Why not swap the tyres onto the opposite rim, so that the tyre at least continues to rotate in the same direction - ie, take the tyre off the LH rim, and mount it on the RH rim, with the "outside" now "inside". Only the inside / outside property would be compromised.

mark maybe the zIII are different because mine are definitely direction as well...

im aware its not an ideal but just trying to get a bit more life out of the tyres before i have to replace them

also am aware i should really address the cause of the camber wear, im assuming adjustable camber arms will enable this to be resolved?

thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
×
×
  • Create New...