Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Doesnt boost automatically raise when cam timing is changed via gears??

If so i think we're only seeing part of the picture as we cannot attribute those gains seen "just" as a change in cam timing but also an increase in boost

Would have loved to see a boost plot on this graph too

peak boost wasn't changed. 15psi before and after. i've posted the power v boost graph before I'm sure. someone better than me at searching could probably find it. as the man said, it may bring boost on earlier so it hits peak sooner but it didn't change what that peak was.

I wasn't running stock actuators. I was running HKS actuators and a profec B II and peak boost didn't change. only thing changed was the cam timing. the EBC kept the boost where it was.

  • 2 weeks later...

ok quick update on mine if ppl were curious...

front pipes (big fat mofos) are in

aftermarket cat is in... its a justjap item (it hasnt been bashed out)

3.5" exhaust in

the car still has its original tune so there is not much difference in lag.... i think there seems to be less lag in on/off throttle response

gonna wait till i get all the other stuff (cam gears, injectors, afms etc) before retuning

new exhaust will def provide more power tho... straight after the exhaust was done the car started backfiring and misfiring at high rpms

time will tell :)

Some place on ebay is selling dash 9's WITH actuactors for 2250 total delivered, pretty cheap.

Or if you are really keen they can be purchased from the U.S for a good price with the dollar nice and strong, only issue doing this way would be shipping costs.

Note: These turbos are more commonly called GT2859 rather than the GT2860-9, so try that when searching for suppliers.

Some place on ebay is selling dash 9's WITH actuactors for 2250 total delivered, pretty cheap.

Or if you are really keen they can be purchased from the U.S for a good price with the dollar nice and strong, only issue doing this way would be shipping costs.

Note: These turbos are more commonly called GT2859 rather than the GT2860-9, so try that when searching for suppliers.

PM 6boost.com, Matt's pricing is pretty sharp and a local supplier/support.

Cheers,

Johno

PM 6boost.com, Matt's pricing is pretty sharp and a local supplier/support.

Cheers,

Johno

Getting mine through 6boost pricing is very good and really good to deal with!!! Just FYI stocks are low of the -9s in Australia so you will be looking at a 3month wait if not instock!!!

Lucky mine are in the mail :P

I think you're nearly better off buying the HKS GT-SS kit. Comes with all gaskets and studs, so when you add the price of turbos + actuators + gaskets/studs the HKS kit is pretty on the money for a better item

With the price I paid I got everything including gaskets for alot less then the GTSS kit which is the exact same turbo just with HKS stamped on it, but each to their own I guess I'm happy with my purchase!!!

  • 5 months later...

Well since there is NO info on this here I just thought i'd put this up and update as I go along.

The comparision below is results for the -1 turbo which is the -9 that comes with a 8.8psi actuator from Garrett, compared to stock R33 Gtr turbos.

post-42272-0-01856100-1318371152_thumb.png

The top window is the -1/-9 which reaches the same level of boost(13.3psi) about 200-300rpm later than the stocks, and the car drives basically the same as before.

The ONLY thing changed was the boost level was raised only one notch on the controller (profecb2) to get the same level for comparision....start/gain etc was left the same and the pfc tune was untouched.

My boost control kit reads 1psi low for some reason, hence 13.3psi

Ignore the scale on the bottom as this would be different due to the length(secs) of each log

Good job Don Dada, always good to see the actual evidence.

I am in the same boat at the moment.

My car made 233kw with the standard turbos, full exhaust, power fc, cam gears and profec2. I have just installed -9's last week and have been driving the car to work and notice that these turbos come on a bit later -200/300rpm later, although this is on the same tune. The car pulls a touch harder but really don't want to rev it hard at all, so without a tune it is hard to compare turbos.

I do think there is massive potential to be had just from the tune + cam gear setup and believe these turbos can give boost response as good as stock. The car was previously tuned by JEM and will be back in there next week for the new tune in which I want to get as much mid range as possible, because I am not overly interested in revving the ring out of the engine just to pull an extra 10kw and blow it to pieces.

I will have definite results and comparisons at the end of next week. Should be interesting.

Well 'seat of the pants' the old turbos pulled hard at 3500-3700 @14.5 psi, so the newer -9s don't have much to beat especially if setup purely for boost response and mid range torque, rather than peak power. We'll see.

when are you gonna put it on the dyno don dada ?

Dyno tune will be a while still when I'm ready to adjust the cam gears.Until then its road tuned

N1GTR.. Technically the only thing new about this is the actuators, and I'm sure if you purchaced -9 from gcg etc. they would put on the same 8.8psi actuator like what I got. Otherwise, same -1 / -9 / Gtss unit.

I think response can be tweaked further with the tune and also with boost control as there is no creep and very minimal spike(1psi) as is right now, so definately some gain to be have there, even if minimal.....and then there are cam gears

Have only been driving it a few days, but it does pull a touch harder on 13psi, But so far I'm satisfied that I have turbs capable of 300rwkw with stock like response.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi again all, I’ve tried doing some searching on the topic but couldn’t find the answer I’m looking for.   I deleted my clutch booster because it had an air leak and was squealing like a hog, and now my clutch has very poor pedal feel and the friction zone is way too small, so I believe I need a bigger diameter clutch master cylinder to compensate for not using the booster. I found a Wilwood option that’s 3/4” for a good price and will fit my 3AN clutch line, but all the firewall adapters I see online such as RB factory or Chase Bays are listed as RWD only (GTST/GTS). Link below. https://rbfactory.shop/products/nissan-to-wilwood-girling-clutch-master-cylinder-adapter My question is if these adapters will also fit a GTR, and if anyone has experience using a 3/4” CMC without the booster, my clutch is a Nismo coppermix twin plate.   Thanks, always appreciate the advice!
    • Catching up on a post, I've replaced the external shark fin with a small 4g antenna (no further drilling, just a 1mm embiggening of the existing hole, and run that to where the dual battery models have the battery in the left rear guard.  No idea what the factory antenna did, but removing it had no impact on anything I use, according to the US manual the GPS antenna is in the dash and it still works fine Also ended up stealing battery power from one of the amps and ACC power from a unit nearby to add an ACC relay to power it. The mounted the booster, wifi, power socket and antenna splitter in the rear left guard out of the way, all out of site with the boot trims in
    • What drama? The only drama you're going to have is the near constant work to maintain all those sphericals. I only have sphericals in my front caster rods and front upper CAs (because both of these are near compulsory in an R32). I have had the front arms out of my car 34 times already this month, and if the new replacements arrive today, I will have them out and apart again tomorrow. Chasing clicking and clunking that comes from sphericals being a.....poor choice for a road car. Moisture and dirt are not their friends. I have been contemplating a change to my rear subframe that would require me to use sphericals in my lower CAs. And.....I don't want to have them that close to the road.
    • Did you need anything else you've already done? If you had it before... and liked the changes after, then supposedly it'd be more of the same. The idea about most suspension arms is to tune geometry that the OEM arms max out at/can't handle because they weren't designed to have the car setup in such a way that 'looks good'.
    • I have replaced everything on my r34 including suspension to Miester R, all rear subframe bushes to poly, all arms to metal adjustable and same in front.   only thing I haven't touched is the front lower control arm. Should I? what improvement can i expect ? I mean the one on the link below?   Car drives perfectly, it is just me thinking everything is either puly bush or hard bearing type so should also do lower control arm front but do I really need it ? https://www.japspeed.co.uk/product/suspension/adjustable-arms/nissan-200sx-s13-s14-s15-skyline-r32-r33-r34-adjustable-suspension-front-lower-control-arms/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAo5u6BhDJARIsAAVoDWs5V_PauQPf0kx3zFCaA4tOC9Q7JSIsfJWma_jAPN2f1sJA686djOwaAidgEALw_wcB
×
×
  • Create New...