Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dyno tune will be a while still when I'm ready to adjust the cam gears.Until then its road tuned

N1GTR.. Technically the only thing new about this is the actuators, and I'm sure if you purchaced -9 from gcg etc. they would put on the same 8.8psi actuator like what I got. Otherwise, same -1 / -9 / Gtss unit.

I think response can be tweaked further with the tune and also with boost control as there is no creep and very minimal spike(1psi) as is right now, so definately some gain to be have there, even if minimal.....and then there are cam gears

Have only been driving it a few days, but it does pull a touch harder on 13psi, But so far I'm satisfied that I have turbs capable of 300rwkw with stock like response.

Aaaaaah my bad!

Here's what I thought you meant;

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/products/turbochargers.html#medium

GT2854R - 471171-9

GT2859R - 707160-9

GT2859R - 780371-1

GT2860R - 707160-5

GT2860R - 707160-7

GT2860R - 739548-9

GT2860RS - 739548-1

GT2860RS - 739548-5

GT2871R - 472560-15

GT2871R - 743347-1

GT2871R - 743347-3

GT2871R - 707160-10

GT2871R - 780371-2

GT2871R - 743347-2

GT2871R - 743347-4

GT2871R - 771847-1

GT2876R - 705330-1

GT2876R - 705330-2

This is the last dyno tune I had, -9's, nismo pump, 555cc injectors, nismo AFM's, cam gears, stock engine.

post-12712-0-13533100-1318426627_thumb.gifpost-12712-0-59905300-1318426635_thumb.gif

Figures in all wheel killerwasps.

Since then I have fitted a different boost controller and the wastgates are now set to open at 16PSI with controller off.

Needs another tune to set boost controller and get rid of the drop in boost pressure. 22PSI tune to follow.

I'll let you guys know....

Aaaaaah my bad!

Here's what I thought you meant;

http://www.turbobyga...ers.html#medium

GT2854R - 471171-9

GT2859R - 707160-9....Gtss

GT2859R - 780371-1....Gtss with act

GT2860R - 707160-5.....2530

GT2860R - 707160-7....R34 N1

GT2860R - 739548-9

GT2860RS - 739548-1

GT2860RS - 739548-5

GT2871R - 472560-15

GT2871R - 743347-1

GT2871R - 743347-3

GT2871R - 707160-10....Gtrs

GT2871R - 780371-2....Gtrs with act

GT2871R - 743347-2

GT2871R - 743347-4

GT2871R - 771847-1

GT2876R - 705330-1

GT2876R - 705330-2

post-42272-0-02044400-1318454661_thumb.png

:thumbsup:

I guess they didn't say anything about injector duty.

I was seeing roughly 90% on a cold night with 22psi peak in the midrange through to 17psi or so at the top end. Rich enough to see black out the back on full boost :whistling:

Stock fuel reg too....

Should be okay, guess I'll find out.

Well since there is NO info on this here I just thought i'd put this up and update as I go along.

The comparision below is results for the -1 turbo which is the -9 that comes with a 8.8psi actuator from Garrett, compared to stock R33 Gtr turbos.

post-42272-0-01856100-1318371152_thumb.png

The top window is the -1/-9 which reaches the same level of boost(13.3psi) about 200-300rpm later than the stocks, and the car drives basically the same as before.

The ONLY thing changed was the boost level was raised only one notch on the controller (profecb2) to get the same level for comparision....start/gain etc was left the same and the pfc tune was untouched.

My boost control kit reads 1psi low for some reason, hence 13.3psi

Ignore the scale on the bottom as this would be different due to the length(secs) of each log

Well with two turns in on the actuators I was able to get it down to stock like response, well on paper at least....To me it feels even better than stock coming into boost

post-42272-0-75110700-1318977532_thumb.png

Top -1/-9, bottom is stock

Is boost creep the only thing to look for with too much preload? I want to shorten them some more :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi again all, I’ve tried doing some searching on the topic but couldn’t find the answer I’m looking for.   I deleted my clutch booster because it had an air leak and was squealing like a hog, and now my clutch has very poor pedal feel and the friction zone is way too small, so I believe I need a bigger diameter clutch master cylinder to compensate for not using the booster. I found a Wilwood option that’s 3/4” for a good price and will fit my 3AN clutch line, but all the firewall adapters I see online such as RB factory or Chase Bays are listed as RWD only (GTST/GTS). Link below. https://rbfactory.shop/products/nissan-to-wilwood-girling-clutch-master-cylinder-adapter My question is if these adapters will also fit a GTR, and if anyone has experience using a 3/4” CMC without the booster, my clutch is a Nismo coppermix twin plate.   Thanks, always appreciate the advice!
    • Catching up on a post, I've replaced the external shark fin with a small 4g antenna (no further drilling, just a 1mm embiggening of the existing hole, and run that to where the dual battery models have the battery in the left rear guard.  No idea what the factory antenna did, but removing it had no impact on anything I use, according to the US manual the GPS antenna is in the dash and it still works fine Also ended up stealing battery power from one of the amps and ACC power from a unit nearby to add an ACC relay to power it. The mounted the booster, wifi, power socket and antenna splitter in the rear left guard out of the way, all out of site with the boot trims in
    • What drama? The only drama you're going to have is the near constant work to maintain all those sphericals. I only have sphericals in my front caster rods and front upper CAs (because both of these are near compulsory in an R32). I have had the front arms out of my car 34 times already this month, and if the new replacements arrive today, I will have them out and apart again tomorrow. Chasing clicking and clunking that comes from sphericals being a.....poor choice for a road car. Moisture and dirt are not their friends. I have been contemplating a change to my rear subframe that would require me to use sphericals in my lower CAs. And.....I don't want to have them that close to the road.
    • Did you need anything else you've already done? If you had it before... and liked the changes after, then supposedly it'd be more of the same. The idea about most suspension arms is to tune geometry that the OEM arms max out at/can't handle because they weren't designed to have the car setup in such a way that 'looks good'.
    • I have replaced everything on my r34 including suspension to Miester R, all rear subframe bushes to poly, all arms to metal adjustable and same in front.   only thing I haven't touched is the front lower control arm. Should I? what improvement can i expect ? I mean the one on the link below?   Car drives perfectly, it is just me thinking everything is either puly bush or hard bearing type so should also do lower control arm front but do I really need it ? https://www.japspeed.co.uk/product/suspension/adjustable-arms/nissan-200sx-s13-s14-s15-skyline-r32-r33-r34-adjustable-suspension-front-lower-control-arms/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAo5u6BhDJARIsAAVoDWs5V_PauQPf0kx3zFCaA4tOC9Q7JSIsfJWma_jAPN2f1sJA686djOwaAidgEALw_wcB
×
×
  • Create New...