Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

10 psi!!!! Jesus.

For sure will be looking at new dumps in the future. But I wish to enjoy the new found power. Besides it keeps me interested in the car if there is always something to do. :)

Are you running mafless?

I'm running twin Z32s with stock airbox

Haha don't worry you will find plenty to do to the car if you really look ;)

  • 3 weeks later...

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/96210-5s-7s-7.html

Just read all 13 pages, not to much mention of the -9's though they seem to have a totally diffrent opinion on -5's.

Main jist here seems to be -7 or -9 with stock motor, -5's for a storked engine.

Yet they are claiming to be making boost by 2000RPM and on song by 4k. Non stroked motors.

a few posts from a couple boys here aswell

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/96210-5s-7s-7.html

Just read all 13 pages, not to much mention of the -9's though they seem to have a totally diffrent opinion on -5's.

Main jist here seems to be -7 or -9 with stock motor, -5's for a storked engine.

Yet they are claiming to be making boost by 2000RPM and on song by 4k. Non stroked motors.

a few posts from a couple boys here aswell

Also don't forget that thread is quite old for the most part (2008 etc). There won't be a lot of talk of -9s as they didn't come onto the market until ~2008/2009 IIRC as they were still under the HKS GT-SS banner and expensive, and then Garrett released them etc.

I mean claims in that thread that -5s are "really into it" by 3000rpm are just plain silly. That same user then posted a graph - 4000rpm not even 170rwkw ... lol... really if that's "into it", i'd be worried. :rolleyes:

Yes they might be building boost - but in 4th gear it'll still takes you longer from 3000rpm-4000rpm than it does from 4000rpm-8000rpm on a 2.6ltr, once the turbos are well into their sweet spot and the motor is working.

End of the day it comes down to ones 'definition' of what is/is not laggy. Turbos that come on @ 4000rpm-8000rpm for ~370rwkw or turbos that come on @ 3300rpm-7500rpm for ~330rwkw

Basically the same power band - just totally different delivery & RPM use. Then there is also response onto boost in/out of gears, on/off throttle etc.

End of the day - do what we've told you. Jump in the passenger seat and see for yourself and what you prefer.

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok, Sifted through the rb26 turbo upgrade thread,

Looked at all -5 and -9 setups with similar mods ect

-9/hks gtss

3k rpm= 130kw

5krmp= 254

100km/ph= 16kw

110km/pk= 130kw

-5/2530

3krpm= 85 kw

3krpm= 100kw

3390rpm=80kw

5400rpm= 200kw

100km/ph=100

100km/ph=110

110km/ph=140

Not many -9/gtss examples, Though

Taken a while to sift through it all, So i thought id post this up for reference to anyone else making the choice, These are all on a std 2.6 capacity

Was actually going to go against everyone's comments and get -5' this week. But this proves the -9s shit all over there bigger brothers, Unless you plan on doing ridicules speeds.

Dude, are you still trying to make up your mind?

man you just need to take the plunge and go and get whatever your goal is.

Is your goal 300-350kw? -9's

is your goal 350 - 400kw? -5's

Done, go spend your money

wish it was that easy....the KW range is not my goal. Although it easier to strive for a particular figure. Now im more looking at the driveablilty.

All fair and well to say you have 400kw....but its not very practical to have that at 150km

Main reason for me doing this is to compare the power at the lower range. And to me it looks like the smaller set up has alot more usable power. ( if ive read then all correctly)

ive taken the time to post my findings for people in the same position in the future...Dont see the big deal?

Nah thats not the problem. What is working on my nerves is, we have said countless times, if you want it power sooner ie boost sooner, then get -7's or -9's and they will yield 300 - 350kw!

If you dont car about lag and your car is not a daily and you want peak power then get -5's and once again, they will yield 400kw's.

I see no fine print in this, it looks very straight forward to me.

Nah thats not the problem. What is working on my nerves is, we have said countless times, if you want it power sooner ie boost sooner, then get -7's or -9's and they will yield 300 - 350kw!.

has anyone actually got 350kw from -7's or

9's

I think someone did 360rwkw, but it's never been repeated (or confirmed).

Common is 320-330rwkw realistically and what people should expect.

+1 to comments thus far. I'm kinda sick of getting PM's about the same topic & questions :unsure:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you want to do a single throttle body conversion easily, you won't need to pull anything apart. Take the linkage from your throttle off the linkage controlling the ITBs. Now open the ITBs wide open, and lock the linkages in said position. Now add a single throttle body onto the front of your inlet plenum. No it's not ideal for the last nth of a kw, but it'll be a lot better than what you're already trying to do...   PS, ITBs can be so damn hard to tune from, because roughly 20% movement in a throttle body equates to a change in roughly 80% of its flow (Hence power). When you add up the flow limitations of those small throttle bodys, it is a LOT higher than that of a single large throttle. Hence, TPS is very very sensitive with them, and you do a LOT of work with sensor fusion, and some Maths behind the scenes to make those blends nice, and be smooth.
    • Yep, when Haltech purchased Adaptronic, and all of the Adaptronic staff, including Andy went with it, it took Haltech to the next level. Haltech wanted Adaptronic as they wanted things like Andy's fuel models, and some other IP, AND they wanted Andy too as he is brilliant! Andy has spoken about the incompatibilities between the old 1500 stuff vs Nexxus, and it totally makes sense. It's not JUST software that is different, there is huge changes in the underlying hardware too. It's why Haltech has had soooo many changes in the last couple of years, in terms of Hardware, and Software, and why it has become so damn Amazing. Why do you think guys like Rob Dahm with his quad rotor, went from running Adaptronic's to running Haltechs? Andy. Pretty much, Haltech these days, is Adaptronic, but with more funds behind it, and more staff, and hence Andy's visions, and visions of other people that he helps shape their great visions, into amazing new products. All the new Nexxus gear, whole new software for it, new and better dashboards, the apps that will run on headunits and NOT be slow to respond! I understand people being burnt in the past, but if you're ragging on a company, about products and issues from many years ago, it's more a reflection on yourself, not looking or keeping up with new stuff. In which case, those people should be going back to PowerFC and Nistunes as the ECU's to rave on about...
    • Right, but I thought the problem has been for a while now that even if you know manifold pressure + throttle position you still have non-linearity and aliasing issues vs actual engine load? One way I can see things simplifying is going DBW, then all air going into the engine is represented by the throttle position. As opposed to a random bimetallic strip vaguely linked to engine temperature opening and closing a shutter or some random power steering air valve suddenly allowing a bunch of bypass air. But the same throttle position/RPM at ~atmospheric MAP in different gears is not guaranteed to be same engine load? Honestly, ITBs are of such dubious value IMO. I don't know why these things are hyped up so much. The main benefit as far as I can tell is you reduce the likelihood of cross-cylinder EGR scavenging with significant cam overlap at idle. I would absolutely run speed density and be done with it if not for this fairly esoteric control problem.
    • Hah dont worry, my adult brain has this conversation every single day. Dont waste your money, invest more of it into shares, pay down the mortgage. Then the bedtime insta doom scrolling begins and after being bombarded with gtr's my mind is set: im definitely getting one! I have the current model mx5 as the weekender, but i just miss my boost and literally like your username, the sututu's that come with it. I remember with my 2nd supra, as it had twins and vvti, they used to spool real early, like 1,500rpm so you could just be a spooly boy all day long. Some people say they get over it after a while, not me tho. 
    • If you need to refinance your mortgage and reset the loan terms back to 30 years and cash out on your equity for "investment" purposes *cough* car parts, I can help 😊
×
×
  • Create New...