Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It was from a canon 15mm fish eye. No editing done to it. Oh its the Sydney harbour bridge. That picture looks so much better in full res.

I just ordered a fair bit of studio equipment. Cant wait to receive it :sick: No more hiring studios out now.

LIke the 3rd hdr pic lepper :action-smiley-069: You can see all the nice colours pop out!!

Edited by siddr20

So since i found the light show on the opera house boring this year compared to last years one, i decided to take pics of the city skyline. Found that to be more interesting and colorful. Anyone else think last years show was much better?

Also since i dont own a tripod (someone stole mine), i rested the camera on something and took this.

20100606203826_img_9915_resize.jpg

  MaTBoY said:
It's the harbour bridge nick.
  Lepperfish said:
Pretty cool you distorted it soooo much he couldn't tell what bridge it was!! :domokun:

Bah, indeed! If I'd actually looked at it properly, I would have noticed that there were two (kind of parallel) arches instead of one, and the number of lanes...

  Mr. Oizo said:
and here's the other room

you can see the softbox on the left, and the diffused beauty dish on the right

mg0201l.jpg

Dude, you need to clean your sensor or lens - there's a HUGE black spot right in the middle of this photo...

:domokun:

  siddr20 said:
So since i found the light show on the opera house boring this year compared to last years one, i decided to take pics of the city skyline. Found that to be more interesting and colorful. Anyone else think last years show was much better?

Also since i dont own a tripod (someone stole mine), i rested the camera on something and took this.

20100606203826_img_9915_resize.jpg

I thought the same thing - last year's did seem better, didn't it? Maybe we were both expecting too much?

Same/similar angle, Sidd?

IMG_7507v2.jpg

I need your skills and connections mr oizo! :thumbsup:

I went for an adventure to Yarramundi the other day, here's some of the area. it's worth a trip out there if you're a sydney sider.

DSC_8559.jpg

DSC_8568.jpg

DSC_8569.jpg

DSC_8575.jpg

DSC_8579.jpg

You can bring your friend if you like.

[Group%201]-DSC_8612_DSC_8633-22%20images.jpg

[Group%201]-DSC_8646_DSC_8659-14%20images.jpg

Wide shot :thumbsup: )sorry if it screws ur browser window ;/ )

DSC_8661.jpg

DSC_8671.jpg

[Group%201]-DSC_8675_DSC_8699-24%20images.jpg

DSC_8712.jpg

DSC_8731.jpg

Anyway... there you go. I only explored about half. So there will be more at a later date.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
×
×
  • Create New...