Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

dudes got my hands on this pump, but dont know wat is or out of.

try to attach pics, it has these numbers on it, can anyone identify them. my guess is its a gtr pump....maybe

A42-621B70

12V 8Y09

UNISIAJECS

I dont know how old it is so if u guyz had the choice wud u use this one or buy a new bosch. I have heard it running and it has noticeable whinning so i dont know if its signs of old age or normal for the pump. it looks ok but not sure .

i need to change my standard pump on my r32 gtst and was hoping to use this one.

thanx

jay

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32335-feul-pump-question/
Share on other sites

All I can tell you is that from the looks of it, its a GTR/Z32 pump. the older ones have black rubber around them, but otherwise look identical. The diaphram at the top gives it away.

Some what stabbing in the dark now, but the R32GTR/Z32 ones have black rubber, the R33 ones dont, as per the photo you have up.

I must qualify and say that I have only ever seen about 8 or 10 of these before, so I am not 100% sure. It will probably make less noise when it is in the tank and has fuel to suck. Should be good for around 250rwkw.

  • 4 months later...

i found the pump is a r32 gtr pump. the gtr pump has a round 20cent size diaphram sitting on a angle at the top. gtst pumps dont have this at the top. also found out it was really noisy cauz the pump was cable tied directly on the bracket meaning metal on metal contact and the metal braket sits on the metal fuel tank hence the noise !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...