Jump to content
SAU Community

Shannons Wont Insure My Gtr


s15guy
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ps.

it would be nice if people who didnt own a GTR 35 stay off this section of the forum.

One who CAN buy such a car is no fool in my mind.

Lol so you are now better than everyone because you own a GTR...Wanker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SO lets see here, you can afford a cars thats $180k yet you dont wanna pay 5k a year for insurance, are you going to be able to pay for tyres, brake pads, trans fluid etc?

my guess is no you wont be able too, or is paying 600 dollars a tyre criminal too? so you will run around on $150 nankangs or somthing

no I CAN pay that quote. But you cant deny that those figures and that excess is not uncomfortably high. Perhaps worst case scenario I will...I dont know. 

But thanks for your input zebra...appreciate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those figures are high because of dick head drivers like you, did you ever think of that?

Maybe if you learnt to behave behind the wheel of a car your quote would be half that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those figures are high because of dick head drivers like you, did you ever think of that?

Maybe if you learnt to behave behind the wheel of a car your quote would be half that.

It's not his fault he "accidentally" goes over the speed limit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appreciate all the feedback but this thread is deteriorating.

My my how people act when not face to face with someone. 

Thanks again for your responses.

Ill visit again when its safe :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appreciate all the feedback but its not what I want to hear.

My my how people act when not face to face with someone. 

Thanks again for your responses.

Ill visit again once ive lost my licence for a 4th time :)

fixed

...oh and can we get this moved to the wasteland where it belongs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lulz

big man huh

he needs to go to the gym and eat some food, wasting away there, a strong breeze might blow him away......... bye bye :)

KUNG POW!!!!!!!

Sometimes this site is tops, today is one of those days!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no I CAN pay that quote. But you cant deny that those figures and that excess is not uncomfortably high. Perhaps worst case scenario I will...I dont know. 

But thanks for your input zebra...appreciate it.

I'd be more uncomfortable with that nagging feeling that if I've lost my licence 3 times in 5 years I'm probably a shit driver.

Insurance companies are there to make a profit mate, they're not a charity. Why should they insure you when you've demonstrated several times that you're a high risk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

never taken my car to chapel st at night mate

never dragged my car

you clearly dont live in Victoria where cops wait at the bottom of a hill in a 60k zone and pull you over when you accidentally hit 70 or 75.

you clearly have never driven on a 80k road where you get pulled over going 85 (but lo and behold the 40k signs from the construction workers were left out on the weekend even though they arent working) and so you lose your license.

Make accusations like that and you look the fool.

drive with ya eyes shut and miss those 40 ks signs your fault

come down a hill doing 70 or 75 in a sixty what your car does not have a brake pedal ?

dont obey the limits make you look like a fool

been driving since 1976 and never lost my license. 3 times in 5 yrs is just bad driving

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is such a nice chap - inviting me to a fighting lesson....dunno how well ill go though, you know with 2 busted knees, stuffed back and shoulder though, but thanks all the same, are the lessons expensive, not sure If ill be able to afford to keep flying to melbourne and pay for the lessons once a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...