Jump to content
SAU Community

Gov Phasing Out Unleaded Fuel?

phatlavish

By phatlavish,
in New South Wales

 Share

Recommended Posts

phatlavish Mentor

phatlavish

Posted
Posted

Anyone heard anything about this? found it this morning..

surely it would affect like 99% of us here as we all run 98? :D

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/petrol-costs-to-...00618-ymu9.html

MILLIONS of motorists stand to pay more at the petrol pump thanks to the state government's decision to phase out regular unleaded fuel.

It is mandating the use of E10, a blend of 90 per cent petrol and 10 per cent ethanol, as part of its commitment to promote renewable biofuels.

This is despite E10 being proved to be less efficient than regular unleaded. Although ethanol has a higher octane rating, it holds less energy than petrol.

That means anyone using E10 could use up to 3 per cent more fuel than normal premium unleaded petrol.

Besides, all cars built before 1986 are incompatible with E10; owners of those cars will have to use premium unleaded fuel with a 95 or higher octane rating.

That will affect about 100,000 motorists when unleaded petrol disappears.

The government has defended the decision, saying it is a necessary response to shrinking oil supplies. "Acting now to develop our local biofuels industry will help to make sure that we have affordable fuel supplies available in the future for all motorists," a spokesman for the Minister for Lands and Infrastructure, Tony Kelly, said.

The NRMA safety expert Jack Haley said the organisation wanted to see the same strategy implemented across Australia.

"We support biofuels generally because they reduce our dependency on foreign oil," Mr Haley said.

Octane ratings determine the grade of fuel and how efficiently it burns.

But with 91, 95 and 98 octane fuel on the market besides E10, it is confusing for many motorists. Experts say the difference between 91, 95 and 98 octane-rated fuel is about a 1 per cent improvement in power and fuel efficiency per octane rating.

E10 now has an unofficial octane rating of about 94 because fuel companies simply add ethanol to 91 unleaded.

Mr Haley warned against using the higher-quality fuel if a car is not calibrated for it.

"There are very few vehicles around that are designed for 98 octane," he said.

The government said it was considering an awareness campaign before next year's fuel switch.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325476-gov-phasing-out-unleaded-fuel/
Share on other sites
GoldZilla Grand Master

GoldZilla

Posted
Posted
id b very happy for them to phase out 98..... as long as they put e85 in its place.....

That's assuming they also help fund the infrastructure to produce and then distribute it, too!

MBS206 Grand Master

MBS206

Posted
Posted
That's assuming they also help fund the infrastructure to produce and then distribute it, too!

It has already been proven, that Australia does not have the usable land space to allow Ethanol to become a highly used replacement fuel.

America did a big swap to supporting farmers for growing crops purely for creation of Ethanol... They started to have food supply issues...

R34Liner Proficient

R34Liner

Posted
Posted
It has already been proven, that Australia does not have the usable land space to allow Ethanol to become a highly used replacement fuel.

America did a big swap to supporting farmers for growing crops purely for creation of Ethanol... They started to have food supply issues...

I dont think it would do any harm to america if it had a little food supply issues.....

FrangaR33 Mentor

FrangaR33

Posted
Posted
I dont think it would do any harm to america if it had a little food supply issues.....

+1 they have all that weight to lose anyway :P And plus if your a farmer in Asia who are you going to sell your food to, the guy down the road for $50 a ton or the big american corporation offering you $100 a ton.

On a more serious note I dont think this effect most of us, I even put 98 in the commodore I find it just plain runs better, so no loss.

MBS206 Grand Master

MBS206

Posted
Posted
I dont think it would do any harm to america if it had a little food supply issues.....

Isn't it funny, per capita Australia is actually fatter then America.

And how about this for weight loss, they just ban fuel for cars altogether. That way we can all catch public transport, walk or ride bikes.

Helping the environment and fat people... (Yes, that was sarcasm)

+1 they have all that weight to lose anyway :) And plus if your a farmer in Asia who are you going to sell your food to, the guy down the road for $50 a ton or the big american corporation offering you $100 a ton.

On a more serious note I dont think this effect most of us, I even put 98 in the commodore I find it just plain runs better, so no loss.

Right... So we're going to double the cost of living now as well?

God you people are smart...

Deano 1 Mentor

Deano 1

Posted
Posted
It has already been proven, that Australia does not have the usable land space to allow Ethanol to become a highly used replacement fuel.

America did a big swap to supporting farmers for growing crops purely for creation of Ethanol... They started to have food supply issues...

what do u mean man? Australia is a massive country with heaps of room....

or do u mean you need a special type of soil to grow the corps to make ethanol?

Kujotk Grand Master

Kujotk

Posted
Posted
It has already been proven, that Australia does not have the usable land space to allow Ethanol to become a highly used replacement fuel.

America did a big swap to supporting farmers for growing crops purely for creation of Ethanol... They started to have food supply issues...

We already use the suga cane waste to produce ethanol in our fuel today. We have enough waste product in other farming industries to support at least a larger ethanol industry than we have today. How much larger it can grow before crops are dedicated to fuel than food is anyones guess, i'd imagine that food crop sold as food would fetch a higher price than crop sold to fuel industry because the good quality crop is better to eat. The shit quality crop that we throw away anyway would cost a lot less and the waste crop would be more likely to be used as fuel...

Any cellulose bassed material can be used to make ethanol so it doesn't just have to be food crop that is used. But yes if they use the space to grow for ethanol instead of food then we might be screwed.

Guess time will tell.

Kujotk Grand Master

Kujotk

Posted
Posted

on the other hand we do have a lot of room that is useless to grow most crops in, but other types of plant materials grow there just fine, we can use these areas, we just need to find plants that can grow in these areas and still makes it viable to produce a profit for ethanol production...

DECIM8 Grand Master

DECIM8

Posted
Posted (edited)

Yeah.. BP does e10 only already I believe.. I wont miss it! also ..Caltex has mentioned it may also sell e85 at selected stations (like v power racing back awhile) which is quite interesting!

Edited by DECIM8
MBS206 Grand Master

MBS206

Posted
Posted
We already use the suga cane waste to produce ethanol in our fuel today. We have enough waste product in other farming industries to support at least a larger ethanol industry than we have today. How much larger it can grow before crops are dedicated to fuel than food is anyones guess, i'd imagine that food crop sold as food would fetch a higher price than crop sold to fuel industry because the good quality crop is better to eat. The shit quality crop that we throw away anyway would cost a lot less and the waste crop would be more likely to be used as fuel...

Any cellulose bassed material can be used to make ethanol so it doesn't just have to be food crop that is used. But yes if they use the space to grow for ethanol instead of food then we might be screwed.

Guess time will tell.

Do some reading on how much land mass is required to support australias demand for ethanol if we used e85 etc as our main fuel.

Think about how little we use already and how much waste crop it is costing to produce...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • PotatoCake
      Is r33 gtr steering wheel the same as the gtst?

      By PotatoCake · Posted

      The steering wheel on my 97 s3 gtr is a little bit worn out, so im on the hunt for something mint. I notice that this type of steering wheel is on several other nissan's of the era.  Does anyone know if their all identical, or are there slight differences? I feel like gtr tax applies to anyone selling one, but if it comes from any other car the price is much less, even though its the same design.  Chat gpt says the material for the gtr is slightly different and it says gtr on the wheel, but every pic ive seen it just says nissan. 
    • GTSBoy
      Shifting questions

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I might have to say it.
    • dbm7
      Shifting questions

      By dbm7 · Posted

      Ahh... it's an early RE5R01A box, that means the pinouts I gave are wrong (they were for the RE4R01A 4-speed box)... I'll have to dig around in my docs to see if I've got that schematic (they used the same gearbox plug, with the vacant pin wired to the direct drive clutch solenoid)...prolly hidden away in a supplement somewhere... ...there were 3 variants of the RE5R01A ~ this early schema was what we called the 'dumb' 5 speed ; it's what jatco called a 'medium duty' box, with torque holding up roughly ~200ft/lbs or so, which was good for NA from RB20/25DE and up to around VG30 output spec. With the RB25DET (and VG33/35 mills), the only options they had was the 4-speed 4AX00 box, which had been beefed up to handle the extra torque (primarily for the VG35, but it also suited the RB25DET mill and others)...and the RE4R03 box in large 4WDs a lot of the time... ...the next variant of 5-speed was redesigned, stronger, and 'smart'...first ones had external TCU with internal (on valvebody) Shift Control Unit, pressure switches, and 2 x TSS...and the last ones had internal TCU+SCU setup, with CANbus control etc etc. @DRoc81 On the RHS of the box towards the rear, there should be a stamped silver ID tag -- what's the model number? Oh...and with the early 5-speeds, the torque converter control solenoid assembly should be replaced as well (31940-60X00)...it's a bit Murphy's Law ....if one has failed, bet on the rest not being far behind ...
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Never ending fuel pump drama

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      I remembered wrong, but was close though 1Kz setting because those Jaycar SSRs don't go any faster, 1x pump per SSR with flyback diodes & heatsinks. In saying that, the heatsinks are overkill. Just on an alloy plate is more than sufficient. You'll find without a flyback diode, your SSRs will heat up big time and also die prematurely.  I've been running the two same SSRs since the last motor, no issues, car does 2 hour straight drives in summer once in a while and gets punished on the track. Nothing melts, no hot messes, etc.    
    • GTSBoy
      rb25 Degreeing cams with hydraulic lifters?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Hmm. You're probably best off working out what the lobe centreline or even the LSA is for the stock cams, with VCT OFF. That's bound to be out there somewhere. Then, work on the assumption that the Kelford centreline is probably the same, and wouldn't be more than a couple of degrees away, if it is different at all. I'm very surprised that you needed to adjust the exhaust cam by 5° to get it on spec. That screams there's another problem somewhere. Anything from the belt being 1 tooth off (how many degrees is one tooth worth?) to simple user/measurement error on the degree wheel. I say this because Kelford, like most quality cam manufacturers these days, does a pretty good job of actually making the cams to spec, not relying on patching it up afterwards like we had to do back in the 80s.
×
×
  • Create New...