Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just wondering if theres any cheap (non brand name) boost controlers out there that are still proper PID controllers. When I say PID I mean for example the eboost with the 3 tuneable parameters sp, gb and sn, these are the proportional, integral and derivative gain terms I imagine. This allows you to allow the gate to open exactly at the right time giving faster spool up over no boost controller, a bleed valve or just a plain electronic one with duty cycle vs revs gain only.

I know theres plenty of other good brand name EBCs out there but they are all $400+, was just wondering if there was something generic out there eg like the jaycar EBC but still allows you to tune all 3 parameters for ultimate boost control and you aren't paying for the brand name?

Just looking at using a bleed valve for now as I can't justify the $400 for the tiny increase in spoolup time and electronic boost cut protection.

Even if you don't know of any generic devices out there if people could list some of the cheaper brand name models that have this functionality that would be fantastic.

Cheers :P

After reading the manual it looks like it only has one gain setting, so perhaps it is not a proper PID controller or maybe it hides these settings from you? You can only change 'offset' according to this manual:

http://www.mygen.com/users/dbruce/myz31/HK...anual%201.0.pdf

Where as the eboost has 3 settings, one is the gain level for your max boost, and then two other parameters, which let you increase the sensitivity so it ramps boost up faster and harder, and another to control the sensitivity so that it doesn't oscillate.

Maybe I will just have to save up and get an eboost second hand.

After reading the manual it looks like it only has one gain setting, so perhaps it is not a proper PID controller or maybe it hides these settings from you? You can only change 'offset' according to this manual:

http://www.mygen.com/users/dbruce/myz31/HK...anual%201.0.pdf

Where as the eboost has 3 settings, one is the gain level for your max boost, and then two other parameters, which let you increase the sensitivity so it ramps boost up faster and harder, and another to control the sensitivity so that it doesn't oscillate.

Maybe I will just have to save up and get an eboost second hand.

Eboost aren't Pid or even pi controllers. Where do you enter your desired boost level? Any reason it needs to be a pi based controller - there's very few on the market. Give me an avcr any dayof the week.

Eboost aren't Pid or even pi controllers. Where do you enter your desired boost level? Any reason it needs to be a pi based controller - there's very few on the market. Give me an avcr any dayof the week.

No reason I just figured it would give better control than a plain simple proportional gain controller. The fact that it had multiple parameters you could tune is what made me think this was the case.

Guess I will have to read some more reviews and find out what are the better EBCs then.

Edited by Rolls
Eboost aren't Pid or even pi controllers. Where do you enter your desired boost level? Any reason it needs to be a pi based controller - there's very few on the market. Give me an avcr any dayof the week.

Agreed yet so many over here for some reason think other wise.

I do not believe the claims that it can not hold boost stable.

utter cod shit its not been set up correctly!!!!!

get an apexi avcr or an hks evc 4 .

both can be had for under $200

wtf do you want to fiddle with ramp for ? avcr is closed untill just before it reaches target boost . = max ramp rate , do you want it slower?

Edited by lachlanw
wtf do you want to fiddle with ramp for ? avcr is closed untill just before it reaches target boost . = max ramp rate , do you want it slower?

People were claiming up to 500rpm decrease in spool time with some of the better EBCs, I thought this was due to the type of controller they were, turns out pretty much anything electronic will be better than a bleed valve and can keep it closed until just before you hit full boost.

If you can build the Jaycar kit they are value for money (can sometimes pick them up second hand). You can adjust boost against injector cycle (not revs) and put in 2 switchable maps (don't know why people want 2 maps). Only got rid of mine because of change to Link and sep w/g ( Link will control boost).

I looked at the jaycar kit but it looked like it based its boost duty cycle entirely on rpm not an error signal from the actual boost setting, though I might be wrong.

Can it match the ramp and stability of the brand name EBCs out there?

I looked at the jaycar kit but it looked like it based its boost duty cycle entirely on rpm not an error signal from the actual boost setting, though I might be wrong.

Can it match the ramp and stability of the brand name EBCs out there?

Yes you are wrong - as above - the boost is adjusted with a hand controller against the duty cycle of the injectors (not the rpm - big difference) . Input = injector cycle, output = solenoid cycle.

It is possible to get rock solid 16psi for example. It does not have facility for automatic temperature adjustment but you could manually adjust the boost settings at the track to suit the ambient temps.

It is possible to adjust speed of boost build.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 馃槩 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
  • Create New...