Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as ethanol burns colder than pulp, e85 has differing spark plug requirements, so i figured we need a dedicated thread.

this thread is to list what you are using and how it performs.

just copy and paste this:

[b]CAR:[/b]

[b]POWER:[/b]

[b]TYPE OF ETHANOL:[/b]

[b]PLUG:[/b]

[b]GAP:[/b]

[b]COLD START:[/b]

[b]HOT:[/b]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325835-the-e85-sparkplug-thread/
Share on other sites

ok, i'll get the ball rolling :rolleyes:

CAR: R33 (RB25DET)

POWER: 323rwkw

TYPE OF ETHANOL: Powerplus E85 (made by manildra, from wheatgrain)

PLUG: BCPR7ES

GAP: 0.9

COLD START: horrible, 10 odd cranks in winter

HOT: perfect performance once warmed up

i'm thinking of trying 5's but i would like to see some people's results with cold start on 6's first

With all due respect, there is no one correct plug for any engine or power. The only correct way to determine what is the best plug for your application is to start with one, run it for 5000 and pull it out to see what she looks like. It is a good idea to see what others are running, though, so you know roughly where to start from. But where hp vs heat range is concerned, due to the colder burn of the ethanol, you'd be able to go back to a factory recommended heat range and work it from there.

  • Like 1

Yeah, I realise that but I thought having a reference might be a good idea for the future.

The other spark plug thread has determined a few fail safe options over the time it has been running And I am hoping for a similar result here :P

I might go for 6's @ 1.1 next time and see how I go...

CAR: M35 Stagea

POWER: 250awkw

TYPE OF ETHANOL: Powerplus E85

PLUG: Denso IKH22

GAP: 1.1

COLD START: Woeful, I have to add 10% unleaded this time of year to get it to fire. Started this morning at 3 degrees with little issue.

HOT: Perfect.

From my experience ethanol burns hotter and faster when under high boost pressures, a colder plug will be fine. I doubt I will be changing plugs just to get the engine to start better.

Ethanol doesn't evaporate below 15 degrees which is why we have issues, its the petrol mixed in that fires for the first few rotations.

Yeah... This is the reason we don't run e100 afaik

cold start doesn't really bother me too much, it's annoying when I am dailying it, but the ke70 should be finished pretty soon.... But I'll bet dollars to dimes I'll have that thing turboed and on the juice within 6 months anyway :P

for the guys having cold start issues, add a massive amount of fuel, like 50% and take timing back to 0 or 5 degrees. it was something said by a tuner from the states, doesnt seem to have cold start issues, even below 0*c.

There are a few drawbacks I see with that...

If you flood the bore with liquid ethanol it will run down past the rings into the oil and help to break it down.

It is still only the petrol firing, if you ran e100 it still wouldn't want to start well, also with below zero temps.

It would require an arftermarket ecu for those that just run larger injectors or higher fuel rail pressures.

I would have to give up the knock signal on my Emanage in order to wire in the temp signal, then I would have to get a cold retune.

I want to fit a small (say one litre) petrol canister in the engine bay, probably in 3 inch stainless pipe. I have the original fuel pump to slide in the pipe and one of the stock 370cc injectors will install nicely into the manifold. Power these from a simple push button on the dash and you're set. I have seen guys in the US running simpler systems they work very well and save wasting ethanol at startup

yeah just had a quick look over what i thought i read ages ago. seems its only good down to 5-10 degrees C, below 5 it doesnt work. i was confusing it with another one that cold started fine in freezing weather, but not on E85

I think e85 cold starting will be an issue for those with lower compression more so than cold plugs, my VQ25det only runs 8.5:1 compared to 9:1 for the stock RB's. I need boost at startup.

I would really like to see somebody build an ethanol specific high compression engine with high boost, wish I had the funds to build one myself. Perhaps one day... if I keep pushing this one... :down:

did you run that gap on pulp?

No, it was .8 from memory.

I think e85 cold starting will be an issue for those with lower compression more so than cold plugs, my VQ25det only runs 8.5:1 compared to 9:1 for the stock RB's. I need boost at startup.

I would really like to see somebody build an ethanol specific high compression engine with high boost, wish I had the funds to build one myself. Perhaps one day... if I keep pushing this one... :down:

One of my friends has a 9.5:1 CR (RB25/30) and his is a pig to start aswell.

i would have thought to achieve better cold start you'd want to lean it off a fair bit.

how many tuners spend enough time on the cold start map anyway... the answer is not enough.

+1

Spark plug is going to have f**k all effect on cold start - unless it's fouled of course

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, it is entirely possible to twincharge a Skyline. It is not....without problems though. There was a guy did it to an SOHC RB30 (and I think maybe it became or already was a 25/30) in a VL Commode. It was a monster. The idea is that you can run both compressors at relatively low pressure ratios, yet still end up with a quite large total pressure ratio because they multiply, not add, boost levels. So, if the blower is spun to give a 1.4:1 PR (ie, it would make ~40 kPa of boost on its own) and the turbo is set up to give a 1.4:1 PR also, then you don't get 40+40 = 80 kPa of boost, you get 1.4*1.4, which is pretty close to 100 kPa of boost. It's free real estate! This only gets better as the PRs increase. If both are set up to yield about 1.7 PR, which is only about 70 kPa or 10ish psi of boost each, you actually end up with about 1.9 bar of boost! So, inevitably it was a bit of a monster. The blower is set up as the 2nd compressor, closest to the motor, because it is a positive displacement unit, so to get the benefit of putting it in series with another compressor, it has to go second. If you put it first, it has to be bigger, because it will be breathing air at atmospheric pressure. The turbo's compressor ends up needing to be a lot larger than you'd expect, and optimised to be efficient at large mass flows and low PRs. The turbo's exhaust side needs to be quite relaxed, because it's not trying to provide the power to produce all the boost, and it has to handle ALL the exhaust flow. I think you need a much bigger wastegate than you might expect. Certainly bigger than for an engine just making the same power level turbo only. The blower effectively multiplies the base engine size. So if you put a 1.7 PR blower on a 2.5L Skyline, it's like turboing a 4.2L engine. Easy to make massive power. Plus, because the engine is blown, the blower makes boost before the turbo can even think about making boost, so it's like having that 4.2L engine all the way from idle. Fattens the torque delivery up massively. But, there are downsides. The first is trying to work out how to size the turbo according to the above. The second is that you pretty much have to give up on aircon. There's not enough space to mount everything you need. You might be able to go elec power steering pump, hidden away somewhere. but it would still be a struggle to get both the AC and the blower on the same side of the engine. Then, you have to ponder whether you want to truly intercool the thing. Ideally you would put a cooler between the turbo and the blower, so as to drop the heat out of it and gain even more benefit from the blower's positive displacement nature. But that would really need to be a water to air core, because you're never going to find enough room to run 2 sets of boost pipes out to air to air cores in the front of the car. But you still need to aftercool after the blower, because both these compressors will add a lot of heat, and you wil have the same temperature (more or less) as if you produced all that boost with a single stage, and no one in their right mind would try to run a petrol engine on high boost without a cooler (unless not using petrol, which we shall ignore for the moment). I'm of the opinnion that 2x water to air cores in the bay and 2x HXs out the front is probably the only sensible way to avoid wasting a lot of room trying to fit in long runs of boost pipe. But the struggle to locate everything in the limited space available would still be a pretty bad optimisation problem. If it was an OEM, they'd throw 20 engineers at it for a year and let them test out 30 ideas before deciding on the best layout. And they'd have the freedom to develop bespoke castings and the like, for manifolds, housings, connecting pipes to/from compressors and cores. A single person in a garage can either have one shot at it and live with the result, or spend 5 years trying to get it right.
    • Good to know, thank you!
    • It's a place for non car talk. There's whoretown which is general shit talking. But also other threads coving all sorts of stuff(a lot still semi car related)
    • Looked it up. It sounds so expensive lmao I'd rather not. Awwwww but I just love that sound
    • If you want the screaming "weeeee" sound, just let the gasket between the exhaust manifold and the turbo break a little. It'll go "weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" everytime its on boost...
×
×
  • Create New...