Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

RB20 heads are shit on RB30 fyi :)

Tommy Kaira M30 was pretty cool wasnt it? It had an RB20/30. The 177kw aint fantastic but almost 300nm of torque in a relatively light car is pretty awesome considering it was NA. I certainly wouldnt say no to an M30 if for no other reason than the investment value.

Edited by *LOACH*
Are you sure about that as the rb20 has a smaller bore and so it would require machining to allow it to fit an rb30

Pretty sure: I have seen an M30 for sale in a magazine in Japan and wikipedia has it listed under RB30DE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_RB_engine

if japan disliked the R33's then they would be nonstop vomitting as we speak at the new V35 skylines, comes with a gay "westernized" NA v6. they pretty much gave the ball away, not dropped it on that one.

So your saying the 350z is gay too? The V and the R are just different type of cars. The VQ engine is probably the one of the best N/A V sixers around just like the RB is one of the best turbo inline 6s. They are different and great in their own ways. If a daily wasn't what I was after I would have bought the R32/R33 as they are more focused and hardcore. The V is much more refined and suits better as a daily but also not far off the mark in terms of performance. And this is the market that the V was aiming for.

My opinions after having owned a few of these cars

The R33 in series one form looks so shit from the front, bad grill, bad front bar, bad headlights, Inside everything feels cheap and is a bit flat and bland. Essentially this is a quintessential mid 90s car from a styling point of view. Great engine, gearbox, handling ect. Also looks good from any angle other than front on.

The R32 looks good from the front looks shoite from the back, I never had a RB20 in mine so never had to deal with the issues related to that, but i have driven a few rb20 R32s and they were very different and i personally did not like it. Inside the R32 had a better feel to it, switchgear, seats ect all feel like they are of higher quality despite being older.

To my eye all the GTRs look good

ande there we have it my 2c lol

The VQ engines had terrible fuel economy though. Much worse than the RB engines of the day.

Are you sure you didn't mean VG? VQ engines are excellent all round. Great economy vs. engine size.

I personally think the RB drinks more fuel vs. engine size.

n/a vs. n/a

I think that wiki is wrong the rb30de they made would have had a rb25 head on it

The ports on a rb20 are so small they make the same power as the rb30 sohc head

I dont think the RB25 was being produced when they made the M30, I am pretty sure it is a green top RB20/30.

Check this site http://www.banpei.net/blog/flyrat-tommy-kaira-m30

and this pic from that website of an M30 bay

post-53059-1282463288_thumb.jpg

RB25DE head from an R32? Don't know if the intake manifold etc looks like the RB20 one like that one does.

Have a look at the two intake manifolds (20 on the left), the RB20 is much closer to the M30 than the RB25. The M30 has the throttle position etc reversed from the other RB20 but apart from that there isnt much difference. Its gotta be a 20.

post-53059-1282470945_thumb.jpg

post-53059-1282470959_thumb.jpg

Edited by *LOACH*
Im with you on that one

Most body kits look freaking terrible, to me lowered on a nice set of wheels looks best

Another +1. The problem with most imports in general is that too many dickheads without a fkn clue ruin the car with GAY bodykits and wheels where in most cases the car looks better in stock factory condition!

Also LOL big to most of this thread!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...