Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes it is correct .

albiet ugly . i left the hose joining the cam covers and ran the one off the spare spigot on the left cover

yes you might expect the empty catch can to do nothing but they do actually work . i have pu tone on when i did my fmic and 18 months later it has a film of oil in it and my intercooler pipes are totaly oiless . i mean spot less . mind you my motor is pretty tight

all you have to do now is f**k the PCV system off

Whats the benefit of getting rid of the pcv system?? Do you remove it by blocking it off???

Yep block it off. It will vent through the catch can.

The only issue i had when i did this, mine was an atmo venting mind you, was that after a while the car started blowing smoke at low rpm. Taking off from lights.. coming to a stop.

I emailed a few SAU people, and Rob from RIPS,seemed as if there wasnt enough breathing with the PCV blocked. Put it back to normal and the smoking stopped instantly and hasnt come back Possibly with the intake sucking away at it it may have been ok.

Something to consider. I dont know if anyone else has had the issues.

Mine

MetalcastHigh.jpg

Dont let the Stock plumb back line fool you :verymad: Its blocked with a bung, but stealthly for stock looking piping. Haha

Edited by gotRICE?

yeah either remove it all together (pull valve out of rockercover and put a bung in it , cap the nipple on the plenum ) or block the line if it stil has to look legal .

doesnt have to in NZ

all the pvc does is fill your plenum up with oil residue any time you are not on boost

if you have good size lines and it set up like above you will never have smoking issues

atmo venting catch cans are f**kin stupid . they create way more headaches than they solve ( unlless done properly , which 99% arnt )

Way more headaches :verymad:? The photo above is an atmo venting catch can and you just said you will never have issues. I don't get what you mean, your contradicting yourself.

Mine has no issues what so ever.

Edited by PM-R33

Yeah im confused too.. lol. How is yours setup PM-R33?

Why does an atmo venting cause issues over a non atmo? And what are the headaches other than issues i came across?

RIPS also said that it was the 1st they had heard of with mine. So i dunno...

Mine is just the two rear lines off of the RB26 covers going into a catch can with a filter on it hidden out of view, similar to what yours is. It barely gets any oil in it though, maybe a millimetre every 5000km when I service it and clean it out.

Oh yep. Is your PCV blocked too?

I re-instated my PCV, and live with the occasional idle hunt because of the un-afm'd air getting in :)

Mine didnt get alot of oil either, it was more like oil condensation sticking to the walls of the catch can haha. That, and the breather filter went black.. so theres a bit getting through i guess.

Little bit off topic but it has been mentioned, would it be possible to use one of these empty cans, and put some air filter paper in it? Been reading a bit about catch cans, and I know some people say to put SS wool inside a stocking and then put that in the can. But wouldn't filter paper do a better job of filtering the oil from the air?

Still not 100% sure on how catch cans work, so I dunno if that is a stupid suggestion or not :)

Catch cans seem to be a very miss understood concept and I always seem to post a quick explanation. Can't for the love of me find my last explanation so i'll have to retype it damnit.

There are two main ways to install a catch can (I say two main ways because there are slight variances in each).

First way is the legal way. The reason it is the legal way is because you can not vent crank ventilation gases/oil into the atmosphere, it must be burnt through the engine and go through the vehicles exhaust system. Therefore the catch can must be in series with the engines current ventilation system. This method is more an oil/air seperator as the oily air goes through the catch can and then continues to go through the engine. This method you are trying to seperate as much of the oil from the air as you can before it continues on through the engine. This is why people say having a hollow empty can hooked up in this way does dick all. The oily air simply goes into the catch can and comes out the other side back into the engine. Therefore it aint doing much. What you want is the oily air to hit as much of a surface area as you can, hence the steel wool/stockings etc. An even better way is to have the exit of the catch can line higher then the entry so it has as much surface area of the steelwool to hit before it exits.

This way has many variances to the way you hook it up but in essence it is the same. Oily vapour from engine goes into catch can, gets seperated, oil stays in catch can, air goes back through engine and is legal.

The second way is the illegal way as you are venting to atmosphere. In this method you get rid of all the standard crankshaft ventilation gear and block off anything that could cause a vacuum leak. You now usually have two exit points on top of each camshaft cover and you run them into the catch can. This catch can must have an opening, such as a filter as you commonly see, as not to pressurise the crankcase and cause the dip stick to blow out. This method doesn't really require anything in the catch can (would help, but not necessary) as the oily air simply goes into the catch can and either stays in it or vents out through the catch can filter.

You will commonly see old school V8s with filters sticking out the top of the tappet/rocker covers, this is the same thing really. The danger with this is if you get an excessive amount of blow by or if something goes wrong, the oil will shoot out and can easily go onto a hot exhaust manifold causing a fire, hence having a catch can is a lot smarter and safer.

That is it in a nutshell, as you can see the illegal way is a hell of a lot easier, neater and does the job better since there is NO oily air going into the engine. This is the method most people use if the legality aint a big concern.

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...