Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

My GTSt has the typical notchy, crunchy gearbox particually into second from first.

I have just put soem redline oil in it but I want to reduce the wear on it where possilbe. Now I dont want to flat change without the clutch but I thought if I shift at about those revs it might put less strain on the synchros? is this true or not? If it is then what rpm is best first to second?

Also what is the proper way to double clutch? This is my first manual car and I can drive it well normally but still trying get my head around all the rest of it.

sorry for the newbie type questions but I know I will get the right answer here

Thanks

well, the simple answer is the synchros are there to look after the gap in revs between gears.

eg if you shift from 1st to 2nd at about 40klm/h you will have to go from 5000rpm to 2500rpm. The quicker you move the gear shift and release the clutch, the less time the engine has to get from 5000 to 2500.

So the best way to look after your gear box is:

1/ back off the throttle

2/ move the shifter from 1st to neutral

3/ let the revs drop from 5000 to 2500 (depends on gears and road speed of course, this is just an example)

4/ move the shifter from neutral to 2nd.

If you do exactly that you will have basically no wear on the synchros...but you will have slow gear changes which is why all gearboxes have synchros these days. If you get the steps above right you also will not have to use the clutch but you may as well incase you miscalculate.

Downchange is the opposite

1/ back off the throttle

2/ move the shifter from 2nd to neutral

3/ blip the throttle to 5000rpm (depends on gears and road speed of course, this is just an example)

4/ move the shifter from neutral to 1st.

Once again, if you get it spot on the shifter will go straight in, and you won't need to use the clutch.

In practice you should be able to do everything above with some practice, just use the clutch in case you get it wrong. Driving like this minimises the wear on the synchros, but once they are stuffed nothing apart from removing the box and replacing them really fixes it.

Do you mean "rev matching" as opposed to "flat shifting"??

If you're talking about driving it like a crash box, in trucks it's more about roadspeed than revs in a gear (you will change up or down at particular revs but which gear you grab depends on your roadspeed, which in a truck is hugely affected by road gradient), because we have wide powerbands and fewer gears, it's harder to rev match in petrol cars and is by no means an efficient/economical way to drive.

I have had to shift without a clutch when I snapped my fork pivot, was an absolue ass of a thing to do but it was 3am and I had to get it to the workshop.

Edited by bubba
Hi folks,

My GTSt has the typical notchy, crunchy gearbox particually into second from first.

I have just put soem redline oil in it but I want to reduce the wear on it where possilbe. Now I dont want to flat change without the clutch but I thought if I shift at about those revs it might put less strain on the synchros? is this true or not? If it is then what rpm is best first to second?

Also what is the proper way to double clutch? This is my first manual car and I can drive it well normally but still trying get my head around all the rest of it.

sorry for the newbie type questions but I know I will get the right answer here

Thanks

Mine is also very notchy from 1st to 2nd. Doesnt crunch but just takes a bit to get in there. Also downshifting from 3rd to 2nd is a bit hard to get in. All other changes are fine, must be something to do with second gear.

I used to change pretty hard, now I take more care.

Mine is also very notchy from 1st to 2nd. Doesnt crunch but just takes a bit to get in there. Also downshifting from 3rd to 2nd is a bit hard to get in. All other changes are fine, must be something to do with second gear.

I used to change pretty hard, now I take more care.

Double de-clutch with a throttle blip and it should go in real nice like. Also works to get it in to 1st gear while rolling.

dude just use the clutch... your goin to do more damage crunching gears tryin to learn to rev match than you will just using the clutch.

but if you insist goin from 4th to 5th is the easyest one so start there

I've taught myself to double clutch on up and downshifts, thanks to the shithouse gearbox in the good ol' VL commy....now I'm getting a bit lazy with the skyline, but I certainly change slowly regardless.

I'll only ever throw it through the gears quickly when I'm driving hard, and then I will ALWAYS double clutch.

my box is a little notchy with 1st-2nd, and 2nd-3rd. Downshifts don't feel notchy, just tight. Strangely though, 2nd-3rd isn't a crunchy kinda feeling, but as it goes from neutral to third without the double-clutch, it feels like 3rd says "naww f*ck off" and gives it a little kick back towards neutral :S

i've had my car for 4 years now... the car is still daily'd and makes 300rwkw on the stock gearbox with a c's short shifter to really make it stressed

i have always treated the box like shit.... smash every gear change when i drive hard,(i do heel-toe on down's tho) flatshift when i need to keep them spinning and things like shoving it into first gear from 6k in second to get round cones. oil was never changed.

when i killed clutch this year we looked inside the box and it's still perfect. filled it with motul oil and it crunches 4th a tiny bit now.... but meh... i'll throw some shockproof in there when i get round to it...

moral of the story? gearboxes are replacable and in the scheme of things not that expensive... RB25 boxes are great from the factory and you shouldn't let a cheap, replacable part let you enjoy your car any less....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
    • I still have an old R32R left over from when they were a thing in the early 2000's. It was, for its time, done about right. But its time was 20 years ago.  I did try and update it a while back but it was cruelled by a (recommended) muppet of a tuna who couldnt tell his MAP from his TPS. The original spec was: Power FC, 700cc Sards, Nismo pump, 2860-5's, cams (Basically Poncam A's), Z32 AFM's and a half sorted oiling system. Thereabouts 430rwhp irrespective of what was done. So, yeah, very 1990's. I eventually got sick of it not being very refined and bought a Link G4 PNP with some 1000cc Bosch injectors. This was tuned badly and I put the car in the shed for a few years whilst I sulked and went and did other things. Ive come around to the idea of getting it going again so it has a new gearbox installed and some other minor things in the planning. So my questions are, variously (In the context of keeping the Link) What other sensors should I be running eg It has no wideband on it at the moment, nor fuel pressure. $? Is it worth chucking the old ignition system (ignitors etc) for new ignition coils? $2k? Cam/crank angle sensors? Can keep the aircon? $? Anything else? Sorry to launch another what should I do with my car thread but, you know, what should I do with my car? Random photo for historical context.
×
×
  • Create New...