Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

a lot of missinformation in that thread.

the compression ratio is the same between the neo and older rb25's.

turbo is different. head has solid lifters and different cams. intake manifold is a better design.

rods are suppose to be GTR rods.. but ive never yet had that confirmed. pistons are the same as is the block.

one has 206 kw . one has 184 . nuff said .

what exactly do you want to know ?

lots of random stuff

neo head has bigger exhaust valves than gtr, combustion chamber is a lot smaller , top feed injectors , new cas . no coil bracket . coils bolt straight to head . takes gay lil oil filter . has bigger exhaust housing on turbo .

RB25DET NEO runs hot burn technology, basically the gases burn at a higher temp which causes less emissions-not sure how that works but it does-closer to EU standards

Which is why the Neos seem to have an 80-82deg thermostat as opposed to the earlier 76.5deg ones.

one has 206 kw . one has 184 . nuff said .

You do realize that the above information is irrelevant dont you? That 22kw would be like pissing in the wind for the R33 motor to make with the most minor of changes to the ecu.

As per OP, major differences with the neo is the head and intake. The neo head has a smaller dome in the and will not work with such things as RB26 pistons etc. The intake manifold is said to be more efficient and uses top feed injectors which are cheaper to outsource.

End result of similarly modified motors is relatively similar :cool:

a lot of missinformation in that thread.

the compression ratio is the same between the neo and older rb25's.

turbo is different. head has solid lifters and different cams. intake manifold is a better design.

rods are suppose to be GTR rods.. but ive never yet had that confirmed. pistons are the same as is the block.

Pistons are definately N1 so they are not the same. Oil pump is a N1 with a small crank collar.... can't remember rods.

bit off topic. but i didnt realise the r33 and r34 gear boxes were a bit different. i got this from a nissan review of thr r34

quote.

Shot peening is applied to the first, second, third and fifth gears of the manual transmission for improved strength and durability to accommodate the higher engine torque. A double cone synchronizer is also provided in the first gear position, in addition to those previously used in the second and third gear positions, for smoother, easier shifting. Moreover, a pull-type clutch for easier operation has been adopted in the manual transmission on turbocharged models.

I don't know the full history of my engine, it has about 120 000kms on it. It had a genuine head gasket, bearings and timming belt in it So it doesn't look like the engine has been pulled apart.

I realise the difference between the pistons, my pistons have the thinker top ringland. (should of said N1 type pistons)

Also is "n" with a single dot above it are the markings for N1?Because my oil pump also has this marking.

I could be wrong.... would be keen to hear from someone who has actually pulled a Neo apart.

I'll be able to throw up a few pictures on here in a week.....

Edited by aleks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...