Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

a lot of missinformation in that thread.

the compression ratio is the same between the neo and older rb25's.

turbo is different. head has solid lifters and different cams. intake manifold is a better design.

rods are suppose to be GTR rods.. but ive never yet had that confirmed. pistons are the same as is the block.

one has 206 kw . one has 184 . nuff said .

what exactly do you want to know ?

lots of random stuff

neo head has bigger exhaust valves than gtr, combustion chamber is a lot smaller , top feed injectors , new cas . no coil bracket . coils bolt straight to head . takes gay lil oil filter . has bigger exhaust housing on turbo .

RB25DET NEO runs hot burn technology, basically the gases burn at a higher temp which causes less emissions-not sure how that works but it does-closer to EU standards

Which is why the Neos seem to have an 80-82deg thermostat as opposed to the earlier 76.5deg ones.

one has 206 kw . one has 184 . nuff said .

You do realize that the above information is irrelevant dont you? That 22kw would be like pissing in the wind for the R33 motor to make with the most minor of changes to the ecu.

As per OP, major differences with the neo is the head and intake. The neo head has a smaller dome in the and will not work with such things as RB26 pistons etc. The intake manifold is said to be more efficient and uses top feed injectors which are cheaper to outsource.

End result of similarly modified motors is relatively similar :cool:

a lot of missinformation in that thread.

the compression ratio is the same between the neo and older rb25's.

turbo is different. head has solid lifters and different cams. intake manifold is a better design.

rods are suppose to be GTR rods.. but ive never yet had that confirmed. pistons are the same as is the block.

Pistons are definately N1 so they are not the same. Oil pump is a N1 with a small crank collar.... can't remember rods.

bit off topic. but i didnt realise the r33 and r34 gear boxes were a bit different. i got this from a nissan review of thr r34

quote.

Shot peening is applied to the first, second, third and fifth gears of the manual transmission for improved strength and durability to accommodate the higher engine torque. A double cone synchronizer is also provided in the first gear position, in addition to those previously used in the second and third gear positions, for smoother, easier shifting. Moreover, a pull-type clutch for easier operation has been adopted in the manual transmission on turbocharged models.

I don't know the full history of my engine, it has about 120 000kms on it. It had a genuine head gasket, bearings and timming belt in it So it doesn't look like the engine has been pulled apart.

I realise the difference between the pistons, my pistons have the thinker top ringland. (should of said N1 type pistons)

Also is "n" with a single dot above it are the markings for N1?Because my oil pump also has this marking.

I could be wrong.... would be keen to hear from someone who has actually pulled a Neo apart.

I'll be able to throw up a few pictures on here in a week.....

Edited by aleks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, you are right. It seems easier and more reasonable to boost the engine. And as you said the blocks are very similar but the cylinder bores are different.
    • Sound logic, but in actuality way more illegal than just having the wrong pipe. Normally, doing something like that would be forgery. Meaning you may have certain documentation for vehicle parts, but the actual parts are different ones and you just assign them the numbers and badging from the documents. But nevermind that. Nonetheless, I AM curious if this pipe was ever made by any official manufacturer this way, because I honestly am not familiar with this pipe layout and shape. As I will be putting on the HKS Silent Hi Power once my exhaust gaskets arrive, as long as it sounds right I will just roll with this front pipe. I can always order the actual Mines part if I run into legal issues. It would be an unnecessary expense as there is lots of other problems I have on this car as of now.
    • So, weld a plate with the Mines logo laser cut into it, onto it. Instant Mines pipes, whether they were or weren't originally.
    • I don't know if the blocks are "the same". They will be very very similar. Obviously, either the bore or the stroke is going to be bigger on the 20. If the bore is bigger, then the 18 head is unlikely to fit properly. If the bore is the same, then you can almost certainly fit the CA18 head, but there migth be a few fun things you have to do to make water galleries (or other things) line up properly. Or... it could just be real easy. Is it worth the effort? Almost certainly not. You can make nearly as much power on a 2 valv ehead as you can on a 4 valve. There's not any "magic" in a 4 valve head.
    • Yes, me too!!!!  I need to find a something that has all the abbreviations for what these cars have LOL
×
×
  • Create New...