Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey, good point Alex. I didn't think of checking it with the Cipher cable. My guess is the ECU reads real speed & modifies the speedo to be wrong.

I have a similar question about intake air temp. Cipher was saying 38 deg when outside was 14 deg as displayed on the dash.

I'm starting to get the feeling our cars are telling us lies the whole time, lol.

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ummm... shouldn't be that wrong. I have mine after the turbo, after the I/C and smack bank in the engine bay (I'm sure you've seen where) and on cruise it only ever reads a few degrees above ambient.

Yours being smack bang at the front sucking what I thought would be cold air, I figure would be pretty close to ambient.

Maybe get a pod filter like me.... :whistling:

Ummm... shouldn't be that wrong. I have mine after the turbo, after the I/C and smack bank in the engine bay (I'm sure you've seen where) and on cruise it only ever reads a few degrees above ambient.

Yours being smack bang at the front sucking what I thought would be cold air, I figure would be pretty close to ambient.

Maybe get a pod filter like me.... :whistling:

LOL, no thanks. It's nothing to do with the filter. Probably some weird correction table at work if you ask me.

If there's only one air temp sensor in the airstream, then why the 2 different readings. Remember, the in car display reads accurate....

The ecu is reading spot on in mine, according to the Informeter and GPS. The intake sensor is located in the afm and is close to the exhaust so temps can get up there, if the car was cold then perhaps the sensor is out?

On my informeter, the intake temp is always at least 10 deg above ambient.

Obviously it will be higher when sitting in traffic.

Averages around 10 above when at steady cruise on the motorway.

Should read identical unless there is some funky in plenum sensor or something.Haven't got it in Fahrenheit have you? Just thought I'd ask!

Ill stick it on Craig's car sometime, and get a reading.

I just had a oh-oh moment, but then checked the data logs. The column header says 'INTAKE AIR TMP ©' & the temps on that particular run were 26-28 deg C. I know the ambient air was ~14 deg C so maybe that is about right - 12 or 13 degrees above ambient??

When you have it near Craig's car, it would be interesting to see if it's similar.

The ecu is reading spot on in mine, according to the Informeter and GPS. The intake sensor is located in the afm and is close to the exhaust so temps can get up there, if the car was cold then perhaps the sensor is out?

Yep, I agree that the ECU knows the correct speed. If Alex or I get a chance to use the Cipher cable & it supports that statement (& it will), then it will be conclusive - Nissan engineers are treating us like idiots by building the optomistic speedo error into the CAN bus.

Re the air temps - where does the dash display get its temp reading from? It can't be the same one co-located with the AFM or they'd be the same (see my findings above).

And sorry to hijack the speedo thread with all this talk of temps.

On my informeter, the intake temp is always at least 10 deg above ambient.

Obviously it will be higher when sitting in traffic.

Averages around 10 above when at steady cruise on the motorway.

OK, so that supports my Cipher readings. In the larger scheme of things, I don't suppose it really matters where the dash display gets its data....

There is a sensor in front of the intercooler for outside temp, it heatsoaks off the radiator when you are parked. I would say it's only for the display or perhaps the climate unit?

The speedo error will be inside the dash, there will be some way of adjusting it but without translated schematics it would be difficult to find. I was hoping the Nismo dash would be more accurate, it isn't. I just use the informeter now.

Ahh, OK, I didn't know there was a temp sensor there. I always figured the heat soak when parked was because it was under the bonnet.

The way to adjust the speedo is with the Jaycar kit & intercepting pin 27 at TCM (same one as used by the cruise control) so it's modified before it gets sent to the CAN.

Two things worth noting:

1) The adjusted output will be a compromise, ie fix it at 100km/h & it may read a bit low at 50km/h

2) Because the signal is changed before getting to the ECU, the ECU won't know exactly what speed you are going so it could affect the odd map table & things like the Informeter will read different (wrong). I doubt that there will be anything too noticable going on though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...