Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Im currently in the progress of building a r32 gts-t with a rb25/30 and while im waiting around I've been thinking of a few ideas. I have a r33 rear cradle spare so I'm going to machine up some offset bushes to fit it into the r32 gts-t.

Im considering making some custom rear traction rods, and toe rods. They look simple enough. Im just asking if anyone has some aftermarket arms laying around, for a r33/s14/s15 if you could please get some photos of the arms with a ruler beside it, or if you could please measure up the lenghs of everything and post it pretty please :)

I have found these rose joints on ebay for cheap. They have a female thread, and the usual arms you buy have male but I think the female would be a better way to go. I can get LH and RH threaded ones. Im also after a size of the thread on these, as the largest I can find is 14mm

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/M14-Female-RH-Rose-...=item587dd0cfbb

Also if someone could tell me which threads are LH and RH.

Thanks a million for any help, and discussion is welcomed

post-39806-1278156289_thumb.jpg

post-39806-1278156293_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/327371-custom-make-suspension-arms/
Share on other sites

Well.. I was just thinking, if I have 25mm OD tube, with 3mm wall thickness, I could tap the internal bore out to M20x1.5 or M22x2.5 and get a 20mm/22mm male rose joint to suit.

But if I used a female rose joint I could machine a 1" thread on the outside of the tube and use a 1" (25.4mm) female rose joint

Just a thought anyways.. and as for Mackay having a dealership I will try calling SKF bearing supplies before I buy anything, they sell rosejoints, I will just have to enquire if they're suitable for automotive

I used stainless rose joints for some swaybar linkages, they lasted a while but the weather eventually got to them. Is this for a track car? If not, they will need protection. Notice the ebay ones you posted have a rubber contact seal.

My view on threads is that machined threads are quite a bad design- they are weak as they act as a stress raiser. Rolled threads (ie, male rose joints) are much stronger as the metal (usually heat treated) is compressed and the groove is not a sharp cut. In a suspension application that you want to not have fail this is somewhere I would only use quality rolled threads in this application. I would make an exception if the part was lathe cut on a large diameter (larger than any available die) with enough thread engagement to spread the load, and with the design of the part putting the thread outside the main load-bearing diameter.

Also if you use 4130, 4140 or 4340 they are harder steels and much more notch sensitive, you need to take even more care to eliminate stress raisers from the design.

I've heard mostly that stainless on teflon lined bearings are best for auto application- also heard that with the teflon ones it's preferable not to use rubber seals. I think you'll find that most race car series rod ends are imperial in measurement. Here's a (place down the road from me) website- www.sesgroup.com.au - there's a list of what sort of load rating each size has. (the race car series are stainless on teflon, and male threaded)

Edited by doo doo
But if I used a female rose joint I could machine a 1" thread on the outside of the tube and use a 1" (25.4mm) female rose joint

That is a horrible idea, stick to what works. With a 1" thread you wont have much wall thickness left on your tube (if it is 3mm) also the ball joint will be huge.

To start with of from an engineering point of view you have to ask about design and rod ends you probably shouldn't be playing around with it.

Don't buy cheap rod ends!!!!! Use ONLY good quality teflon/stainless end at least. Teflon/4130 end are available as well.

They can be bought metric but imperial are easier to source and more widely used

3/4unf MALE joints are what you should be using for any lower control arm and 5/8 unf for most other things.

Do not ever cut a thread into a control arm and screw the rod end into it directly. Biggest no no of all. Machine up a sleeve that is a neat interferance fit into the tube and leave a step atleast half the length of your rod end length. Drill and tap the thread into your sleeve then weld the sleeve into the control arm. Allows a far greater wall thickness of the threaded section and a smaller wall thickness tube to be used For the arm.

For the outters don't use rose joint ends. Use spherical bearings and machine up a sleeve with a circlip groove to retain them. Spericals in a sleeve are far stronger for a single application ( you have two inners and one outter on a lower arm for example) and it allows the arms end to penetrate into the sleeve ad be welded far better

I use 1inch 4130 for pretty much everything except front lower arms.

To start with of from an engineering point of view you have to ask about design and rod ends you probably shouldn't be playing around with it.

Don't buy cheap rod ends!!!!! Use ONLY good quality teflon/stainless end at least. Teflon/4130 end are available as well.

They can be bought metric but imperial are easier to source and more widely used

3/4unf MALE joints are what you should be using for any lower control arm and 5/8 unf for most other things.

Do not ever cut a thread into a control arm and screw the rod end into it directly. Biggest no no of all. Machine up a sleeve that is a neat interferance fit into the tube and leave a step atleast half the length of your rod end length. Drill and tap the thread into your sleeve then weld the sleeve into the control arm. Allows a far greater wall thickness of the threaded section and a smaller wall thickness tube to be used For the arm.

For the outters don't use rose joint ends. Use spherical bearings and machine up a sleeve with a circlip groove to retain them. Spericals in a sleeve are far stronger for a single application ( you have two inners and one outter on a lower arm for example) and it allows the arms end to penetrate into the sleeve ad be welded far better

I use 1inch 4130 for pretty much everything except front lower arms.

I would also add don't forget to fishmouth the tube where the sleeve is welded in so you don't get a heat affected zone all in one tension/compression plane. If 4130 is welded stress relieving would be beneficial, even for 3mm thick tube IMO (plus using 4130 filler rod or oxweld #32 rod)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
    • @Dose Pipe Sutututu I read your replies RE: R35 GTR MAFs, any ideal spots to put on? Obviously will need the adapter plate. Will be having a cross over intercooler fitted shortly, would putting it a bit before the TB be okay?
×
×
  • Create New...