Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, my names riyad and im from across the ditch looking for some help !

been on here for quite a while and have learned quite a fair bit and that everyone on heres pretty friendly.

now to what i need help on, im dropping an RB20det out of a R32 gtst into my cefiro what i basically need to know what to look out for ? whats gonna be a pain for me to do etc ?

also if someone could tell me whether the RB20de starter motor will work with the det motor ?

At present ive only started to disassemble the wiring, fuel lines and all the other crap from the engine.

Sorry if ive asked dum questions as in still only 17 and studying automotive engineering atm so i dont know everything, but i have to learn the hard way thats why im doing it myself (and with the help of a few mates of course )

any help will be appreciated guys and i definitely wil have more questions to come your way.

cheers riyad.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/327501-rb20det-into-cefiro-help/
Share on other sites

Yes but the sensors still differ between early and mid model A31, and R32 GTST.

i believe late model Cefiro's have same wiring harness plugs and AFM as R32.

My Ceffy was turned turbo, they used the 20DE loom and everything on it, even the air flow meter, and just swaped in the bare motor...when I got an R32 AFM it didn't fit the Cefiro plug.

sweet so my starter motor will work ? even tho mines a factory manual cefiro ?

Yeah ive been told that the harness is quite similar thanks alot dude.

One more thing im after a nine bolt flywheel, ive been told the the RB30e one will work but is slightly bigger ? if true will a 9.5"/240mm clutch work with this and clear my gearbox ? what other options do i have as ive been told the RB20DE clutches are not worth it in the long run.

Cheers

sweet so my starter motor will work ? even tho mines a factory manual cefiro ?

Yeah ive been told that the harness is quite similar thanks alot dude.

One more thing im after a nine bolt flywheel, ive been told the the RB30e one will work but is slightly bigger ? if true will a 9.5"/240mm clutch work with this and clear my gearbox ? what other options do i have as ive been told the RB20DE clutches are not worth it in the long run.

Cheers

Try d1nz.com forums they have a full rite up on doing the conversion it helped me out good and proper when i did my conversion,

I think i used a rb30 flywheel and its been sweet as using excedy clutch, dont bother using de clutch as ive just heard clutches r crap n dont last

^^ as above the D1NZ guide is perfect for someone doing it first time, are you getting an engine loom with the engine ? if so it will plug straight into the body loom of the car, you only need to change a few wires under the fuse box.

http://forums.d1nz.com/viewtopic.php?t=254...2f708026aa142be

Link... this is all you need..

  • 1 month later...

hey guys, thanks for all the help its helped me get through the conversion pretty sweet. just a few more questions now. you guys that are running thick alloy rads, do you have any issues with the engine fan, as i trial fitted mine today and had about 3-4mm clearance between the 2 items. So i now im thinking i might need to run a electric fan to over come this problem... any thoughts ? also im going to be running a R32 front mount intercooler kit, i have a fair idea about where the holes need to be made for the piping but i would just like to reassure myself and if someone has pics it would be great.

any help would be appreciated, thanks alot guys.

are you thinking of R32 GTR's that run a ballast resistor ? because RB20 powered GTST's do not have it. nor do cefiro spec'd RB20's

yea I see the GTR one is different but Im just trying to figure out what the silver doofa is on a R32 L/H strut tower, Im thinking some sort of fuel control

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
×
×
  • Create New...