Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have for sale a rb20det turbo high flowed with garrett internals.

GT30 compressor wheel and larger exhaust wheel.

.58 exhaust housing.

Made full boost on rb20 same as a stock turbo. and makes good power up top.

just been rebuilt so is in brand new condition, new seals, bearings and balanced.

direct bolt on for rb20. would fit rb25 but would be better suited for r32.

$650 ono

Geelong pickup.

post-52856-1278323665_thumb.jpg

post-52856-1278323773_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/327642-rb20-hi-flow-turbo-garrett/
Share on other sites

Just wondering if the turbo has had the wastegate hole ported and a larger flap fitted?

I have a stock rb20 turbo so i will compare the sizes when i get it back from the turbo shop after rebuild.

pretty sure it is though.

made just under 200kw.

You say it made just under 200kws atw, was this on a stock engine?

with supporting mods.

-FMIC

-Fuel pump

-Exhaust.

thats about it. Everything else can be left stock.

Unless you want to run Hi boost, As in 18ish psi. May need injectors and z32 AFM

thanks

Ok, id be keen but its just too pricey when i can pick up a rb25 turbo for $200 that pretty much does the same thing, ill never need anything over 14 psi as my cars street driven thats all

Yes you can pick up a Rb25 turbo for $200

and it may last 5 years, may last 5 days. This turbo has just been rebuilt with receipt, So comes with 12mth warranty.

Also your rb25 turbo will be 500prm laggier than this. and this will be able to cope with much more than 14psi, And I'm sure one day you will want to run more than 14psi in the hunt for more power. especially in an rb20.

I understand if its out of your price range, But these hi-flow's are quite rare. And to high flow a turbo will cost you at least $1000.

therefor i see my price as reasonable.

thanks for the interest buddy. happy hunting =)

Luke

  • 1 month later...

hey u said this would be better suited to a 32 why is that, i thought the 32 and 33 turbo was the same plus its been highflowed so it would bolt staight on .. very keen depending on answer

sounds like a good turbo, at a good price too

gl with sale buddy

this turbo can be boosted higher than stock rb25 turbos since it's got steel internals

the stock rb25 turbo for $200 from me is no longer available so this is a good option

anyone interested in a high flow for their rb25 can buy this turbo and my spare high flowed exhaust housing + intake housing for cheap, swap the exhaust housings over and there you have a very capable turbo that can put out 250rwkw

Edited by chiksluvit
sounds like a good turbo, at a good price too

gl with sale buddy

this turbo can be boosted higher than stock rb25 turbos since it's got steel internals

the stock rb25 turbo for $200 from me is no longer available so this is a good option

anyone interested in a high flow for their rb25 can buy this turbo and my spare high flowed exhaust housing + intake housing for cheap, swap the exhaust housings over and there you have a very capable turbo that can put out 250rwkw

Tempting, guys just and update, I decided to use this turbo on my 20, Going great, How much for your rear housing?I could always use more power :D

that will be the limiting factor on this turbo, As i explained to you in my message havoc, Would choke up top, And power would taper off, Also i think you would have boost control problems.

thanks guys =)

the rear + centre + compressor housings + actuator the whole lot for $60, check my signature for link to my sale page for photos...

only the rear housing is high flowed though, done by GCG, they also use garrett parts when they high flow turbos, so it would've been done to garrett specs

so with your price of $575+$60= a bloody good buy for a highflow turbo with garrett internals that will make just as much power as an R33 highflow, if you're still selling it though

Edited by chiksluvit
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
×
×
  • Create New...