Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have for sale a rb20det turbo high flowed with garrett internals.

GT30 compressor wheel and larger exhaust wheel.

.58 exhaust housing.

Made full boost on rb20 same as a stock turbo. and makes good power up top.

just been rebuilt so is in brand new condition, new seals, bearings and balanced.

direct bolt on for rb20. would fit rb25 but would be better suited for r32.

$650 ono

Geelong pickup.

post-52856-1278323665_thumb.jpg

post-52856-1278323773_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/327642-rb20-hi-flow-turbo-garrett/
Share on other sites

Just wondering if the turbo has had the wastegate hole ported and a larger flap fitted?

I have a stock rb20 turbo so i will compare the sizes when i get it back from the turbo shop after rebuild.

pretty sure it is though.

made just under 200kw.

You say it made just under 200kws atw, was this on a stock engine?

with supporting mods.

-FMIC

-Fuel pump

-Exhaust.

thats about it. Everything else can be left stock.

Unless you want to run Hi boost, As in 18ish psi. May need injectors and z32 AFM

thanks

Ok, id be keen but its just too pricey when i can pick up a rb25 turbo for $200 that pretty much does the same thing, ill never need anything over 14 psi as my cars street driven thats all

Yes you can pick up a Rb25 turbo for $200

and it may last 5 years, may last 5 days. This turbo has just been rebuilt with receipt, So comes with 12mth warranty.

Also your rb25 turbo will be 500prm laggier than this. and this will be able to cope with much more than 14psi, And I'm sure one day you will want to run more than 14psi in the hunt for more power. especially in an rb20.

I understand if its out of your price range, But these hi-flow's are quite rare. And to high flow a turbo will cost you at least $1000.

therefor i see my price as reasonable.

thanks for the interest buddy. happy hunting =)

Luke

  • 1 month later...

hey u said this would be better suited to a 32 why is that, i thought the 32 and 33 turbo was the same plus its been highflowed so it would bolt staight on .. very keen depending on answer

sounds like a good turbo, at a good price too

gl with sale buddy

this turbo can be boosted higher than stock rb25 turbos since it's got steel internals

the stock rb25 turbo for $200 from me is no longer available so this is a good option

anyone interested in a high flow for their rb25 can buy this turbo and my spare high flowed exhaust housing + intake housing for cheap, swap the exhaust housings over and there you have a very capable turbo that can put out 250rwkw

Edited by chiksluvit
sounds like a good turbo, at a good price too

gl with sale buddy

this turbo can be boosted higher than stock rb25 turbos since it's got steel internals

the stock rb25 turbo for $200 from me is no longer available so this is a good option

anyone interested in a high flow for their rb25 can buy this turbo and my spare high flowed exhaust housing + intake housing for cheap, swap the exhaust housings over and there you have a very capable turbo that can put out 250rwkw

Tempting, guys just and update, I decided to use this turbo on my 20, Going great, How much for your rear housing?I could always use more power :D

that will be the limiting factor on this turbo, As i explained to you in my message havoc, Would choke up top, And power would taper off, Also i think you would have boost control problems.

thanks guys =)

the rear + centre + compressor housings + actuator the whole lot for $60, check my signature for link to my sale page for photos...

only the rear housing is high flowed though, done by GCG, they also use garrett parts when they high flow turbos, so it would've been done to garrett specs

so with your price of $575+$60= a bloody good buy for a highflow turbo with garrett internals that will make just as much power as an R33 highflow, if you're still selling it though

Edited by chiksluvit
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
×
×
  • Create New...