Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

1st-

I would like to know how much power can be produce of each of the fuel system components, ie. how much power the fuel rail, fuel pump and injectors can handle individually

2nd-

I would also like to know what mods I would need to get to reach my first goal 250-300rwkw, Preferably 300rwkw

I am currently producing 195rwkw

I have

-Power FC

-High flow intercooler

-High flow exhaust

-Greddy intake manifold

-Greddy radiator

-Greddy oil cooler kit

-splitfire coilpacks

-Gizzmo boost controller

I also have a wet NOS kit (50-100HP) but it is not installed

and soon to get Nitto drag metal head gasket

Hope you can help guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328249-stock-fuel-system-power-package/
Share on other sites

Ok first thing, head gasket. Don't bother replacing it, why would you?. If anything you want a stock headgasket since it can potentially save your engine by blowing the gasket first.

For the stock fuel pump, realistically anything over a stock turbo it should be replaced. Hell even with it's given age it should be replaced. Read this thread regarding the stock fuel pump, few good explanations there:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Po...mp;hl=fuel+pump

For the injectors people say different power levels since some qoute stock fuel pressure limits, others bump up the rail pressure to squeeze a bit out of them. As a rule of thumb, I think people see a high injector duty cycle around the 220-230rwkw mark. As I have said, some people say different things. But for your power goals you gotta change them anyway, so just go for something around the 740 mark if you are planning on over 300rwkw. Personally I wish I had gotten the Nismo 740s over the Nismo 555s for the extra head room.

Fuel rail don't bother at the power levels we are talking other than if you wan't a nicer looking one.

Now for the power goal, are you talking with the nitrous, or without? Because that is going to be a big difference in recommendations.

In essence you have all the right ingredients all ready to go on the car, just comes down to turbo choice.

Remember though, at the 300kw mark the RB25 bottom end is at a high risk of letting go.

Edited by PM-R33
Ok first thing, head gasket. Don't bother replacing it, why would you?. If anything you won't a stock headgasket since it can potentially save your engine by blowing the gasket first.

For the stock fuel pump, realistically anything over a stock turbo it should be replaced. Hell even with it's given age it should be replaced. Read this thread regarding the stock fuel pump, few good explanations there:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Po...mp;hl=fuel+pump

For the injectors people say different power levels since some qoute stock fuel pressure limits, others bump up the rail pressure to squeeze a bit out of them. As a rule of thumb, I think people see a high injector duty cycle around the 220-230rwkw mark. As I have said, some people say different things. But for your power goals you gotta change them anyway, so just go for something around the 740 mark if you are planning on over 300rwkw. Personally I wish I had gotten the Nismo 740s over the Nismo 555s for the extra head room.

Fuel rail don't bother at the power levels we are talking other than if you wan't a nicer looking one.

Now for the power goal, are you talking with the nitrous, or without? Because that is going to be a big difference in recommendations.

In essence you have all the right ingredients all ready to go on the car, just comes down to turbo choice.

Remember though, at the 300kw mark the RB25 bottom end is at a high risk of letting go.

+1 on everything except the last sentence

Stock Rb25's are ok to 500hp at the wheels if revs are kept to sensible levels

And providing you get it tuned by someone who knows what the f**k they are doing

Thanks, For the advice on the fuel, With the nitrous i was think 300rwkw before nitrous (maybe 475HP with nitrous), I have to replace my head gasket because It has popped a water channel out under the exhaust manifold (not really sure why there was pressure in the water channels anyway)

Ok first thing, head gasket. Don't bother replacing it, why would you?. If anything you won't a stock headgasket since it can potentially save your engine by blowing the gasket first.

For the stock fuel pump, realistically anything over a stock turbo it should be replaced. Hell even with it's given age it should be replaced. Read this thread regarding the stock fuel pump, few good explanations there:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Po...mp;hl=fuel+pump

For the injectors people say different power levels since some qoute stock fuel pressure limits, others bump up the rail pressure to squeeze a bit out of them. As a rule of thumb, I think people see a high injector duty cycle around the 220-230rwkw mark. As I have said, some people say different things. But for your power goals you gotta change them anyway, so just go for something around the 740 mark if you are planning on over 300rwkw. Personally I wish I had gotten the Nismo 740s over the Nismo 555s for the extra head room.

Fuel rail don't bother at the power levels we are talking other than if you wan't a nicer looking one.

Now for the power goal, are you talking with the nitrous, or without? Because that is going to be a big difference in recommendations.

In essence you have all the right ingredients all ready to go on the car, just comes down to turbo choice.

Remember though, at the 300kw mark the RB25 bottom end is at a high risk of letting go.

I reckon I will probably get a set of forgies ready so that i can eventually go over the 500hp mark when the time comes

+1 on everything except the last sentence

Stock Rb25's are ok to 500hp at the wheels if revs are kept to sensible levels

And providing you get it tuned by someone who knows what the f**k they are doing

lol at "won't" instead of want.

do a search . go read the dyno results thread

Fixed mother f**ker :yes:

+1 on everything except the last sentence

Stock Rb25's are ok to 500hp at the wheels if revs are kept to sensible levels

And providing you get it tuned by someone who knows what the f**k they are doing

I'll hold you to that :) haha. But yeah I know what you mean.

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That seems like a very special issue!  Does it affect both sides? Either way, I would disconnect the driver's side switch and see if it still happens, noting that might require removal of the whole door card which is a bit of a pain (it does on V37 and HY51)  
    • MBS206:- The windows start to slowly open themselves. GTSBoy:- Battery is new since Dec. 
    • I currently have a 2008 370GT Coupe, with the big brakes (Akebeno if I'm correct), and Its coming time to get new pads. Previously, I had a 2003 350GT Coupe with the stock sized brakes, not Brembos. I had custom wheels on it that were pretty open to the brakes, and when I first put the wheels on it, the rims where completely coated with brake dust. A few years after adding the new rims, I needed to change to pads on that car. I didn't do any research, but I told the mechanic of the problem with the brake dust. I also told him I didn't track the car or even drive around the streets harshley. But the dust was an issue. The mechanics changed the pads to a different compound, and the dust was GONE! The other change I noted was that when coming to a complete stop, instead of having to press harder on the pedal as I approached 0kph, I had to actually lift off a little to not come to a hard jerky stop.( My unfounded explanation is they became stickier as they heated by stopping ) Since I got my 370gt with big brakes, I noticed that that as I came closer to stopping, I had to press harder and harder to reach a full stop. I am not talking about hard, just harder. I brought the car in from another state, so when I had a blue slip done, I asked the mechanic what he thought of the brakes, and he thought they were brilliant. The only negative of these pads on the 350GT, was that they squealed when cold. So driving out of a shopping center carpark, it was a little embarrassing, as the brakes squealed, and I am sure people thought that I needed new brakes, when they were actually fresh. I have no idea of what type of compound they were on the 350gt, but whatever it was, I want to get the exact same on my 370GT. They weren't ridiculously expensive, and were replaced at the local JAX (which is no longer open), so I am certain they would be a pretty common big brand, off the shelf type/brand. My current mechanic suggested I need top get the rear pads changed soonish, but he suggested standard Brembo pads. Which I expect to behave the same as the current ones and not like the ones on the 350GT.  I don't think dust will be an issue on the 370GT. With the behaviour I describe above on the 360GT, does anyone have a suggestion of pad material that will act like the change I had done on the 350GT?
    • The consult isn't even OBD1. It's a Nissan Consult. Proprietary.   Re read everything I've said. I specifically say, put down the laptop/tablet. Understand, and review the issue first. Logging voltages is the same as logging the converted value. Things like O2 that you say to log, is unusable for this, whether it be the voltage, or the value the ECU thinks.   The fact you don't know how to diagnose without looking at the computer, is exactly what I've said multiple times is the issue for why techs these days can't diagnose the fun issues with cars.
    • Breather for it. If it's anything like the GTRs it should run up to the top of a bellhousing bolt.
×
×
  • Create New...