Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

1st-

I would like to know how much power can be produce of each of the fuel system components, ie. how much power the fuel rail, fuel pump and injectors can handle individually

2nd-

I would also like to know what mods I would need to get to reach my first goal 250-300rwkw, Preferably 300rwkw

I am currently producing 195rwkw

I have

-Power FC

-High flow intercooler

-High flow exhaust

-Greddy intake manifold

-Greddy radiator

-Greddy oil cooler kit

-splitfire coilpacks

-Gizzmo boost controller

I also have a wet NOS kit (50-100HP) but it is not installed

and soon to get Nitto drag metal head gasket

Hope you can help guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328249-stock-fuel-system-power-package/
Share on other sites

Ok first thing, head gasket. Don't bother replacing it, why would you?. If anything you want a stock headgasket since it can potentially save your engine by blowing the gasket first.

For the stock fuel pump, realistically anything over a stock turbo it should be replaced. Hell even with it's given age it should be replaced. Read this thread regarding the stock fuel pump, few good explanations there:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Po...mp;hl=fuel+pump

For the injectors people say different power levels since some qoute stock fuel pressure limits, others bump up the rail pressure to squeeze a bit out of them. As a rule of thumb, I think people see a high injector duty cycle around the 220-230rwkw mark. As I have said, some people say different things. But for your power goals you gotta change them anyway, so just go for something around the 740 mark if you are planning on over 300rwkw. Personally I wish I had gotten the Nismo 740s over the Nismo 555s for the extra head room.

Fuel rail don't bother at the power levels we are talking other than if you wan't a nicer looking one.

Now for the power goal, are you talking with the nitrous, or without? Because that is going to be a big difference in recommendations.

In essence you have all the right ingredients all ready to go on the car, just comes down to turbo choice.

Remember though, at the 300kw mark the RB25 bottom end is at a high risk of letting go.

Edited by PM-R33
Ok first thing, head gasket. Don't bother replacing it, why would you?. If anything you won't a stock headgasket since it can potentially save your engine by blowing the gasket first.

For the stock fuel pump, realistically anything over a stock turbo it should be replaced. Hell even with it's given age it should be replaced. Read this thread regarding the stock fuel pump, few good explanations there:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Po...mp;hl=fuel+pump

For the injectors people say different power levels since some qoute stock fuel pressure limits, others bump up the rail pressure to squeeze a bit out of them. As a rule of thumb, I think people see a high injector duty cycle around the 220-230rwkw mark. As I have said, some people say different things. But for your power goals you gotta change them anyway, so just go for something around the 740 mark if you are planning on over 300rwkw. Personally I wish I had gotten the Nismo 740s over the Nismo 555s for the extra head room.

Fuel rail don't bother at the power levels we are talking other than if you wan't a nicer looking one.

Now for the power goal, are you talking with the nitrous, or without? Because that is going to be a big difference in recommendations.

In essence you have all the right ingredients all ready to go on the car, just comes down to turbo choice.

Remember though, at the 300kw mark the RB25 bottom end is at a high risk of letting go.

+1 on everything except the last sentence

Stock Rb25's are ok to 500hp at the wheels if revs are kept to sensible levels

And providing you get it tuned by someone who knows what the f**k they are doing

Thanks, For the advice on the fuel, With the nitrous i was think 300rwkw before nitrous (maybe 475HP with nitrous), I have to replace my head gasket because It has popped a water channel out under the exhaust manifold (not really sure why there was pressure in the water channels anyway)

Ok first thing, head gasket. Don't bother replacing it, why would you?. If anything you won't a stock headgasket since it can potentially save your engine by blowing the gasket first.

For the stock fuel pump, realistically anything over a stock turbo it should be replaced. Hell even with it's given age it should be replaced. Read this thread regarding the stock fuel pump, few good explanations there:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Po...mp;hl=fuel+pump

For the injectors people say different power levels since some qoute stock fuel pressure limits, others bump up the rail pressure to squeeze a bit out of them. As a rule of thumb, I think people see a high injector duty cycle around the 220-230rwkw mark. As I have said, some people say different things. But for your power goals you gotta change them anyway, so just go for something around the 740 mark if you are planning on over 300rwkw. Personally I wish I had gotten the Nismo 740s over the Nismo 555s for the extra head room.

Fuel rail don't bother at the power levels we are talking other than if you wan't a nicer looking one.

Now for the power goal, are you talking with the nitrous, or without? Because that is going to be a big difference in recommendations.

In essence you have all the right ingredients all ready to go on the car, just comes down to turbo choice.

Remember though, at the 300kw mark the RB25 bottom end is at a high risk of letting go.

I reckon I will probably get a set of forgies ready so that i can eventually go over the 500hp mark when the time comes

+1 on everything except the last sentence

Stock Rb25's are ok to 500hp at the wheels if revs are kept to sensible levels

And providing you get it tuned by someone who knows what the f**k they are doing

lol at "won't" instead of want.

do a search . go read the dyno results thread

Fixed mother f**ker :yes:

+1 on everything except the last sentence

Stock Rb25's are ok to 500hp at the wheels if revs are kept to sensible levels

And providing you get it tuned by someone who knows what the f**k they are doing

I'll hold you to that :) haha. But yeah I know what you mean.

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's something we all have to consider as time marches on. Also consider lifted rally MX5 conversion at that point.
    • I should be fine for a few more years, whilst I do have arthritis I also exercise and do mobility training every day to keep as fit and healthy as I can, military life, which is the actual cause of most of my joint issues, has set daily regimes, which I weirdly enjoy I also train alot smarter now, not really focusing on lots strength or puffy muscles, I'm more focused on maintaining what I have for my future older self, I actually train as much mobility now as I do exercising Check out this "simple" drill I have been doing daily prior to training now for a while now, this has worked wonders in my all round mobility   
    • I'd say one thing that may make you sell is the same reason the guy with the hard top roof sold his. He got old, and his back was giving him too much grief stopping him getting in and out... Old guy said he was 73! He looked and sounded younger than 73 to me! Or maybe I'm just aligning with old people more...
    • Already looked at a few prior to getting the MX5, really nice car, had all the mod cons, but I wasn't really sold on the new "look" I did miss my 2017 Limited, and I personally prefer the "look" of the older car over the new model, but, when pondering I kept going back looking at MX5's But it was same same for the new ND's, I wasn't sold on the new "look", especially the RF with its weird roof, which only half goes down, like a targa top sort of thing As I stated before, I did look at NC's, but the cars I looked at were PRHT's, but I didn't like their roof line "look" of the PRHT, until I saw the soft top version, (someone on SAU posted a for sale ad for one with a soft top that caught my attention, you can blame them for my choice.....🤣) and.... that old style detachable hard tops were available for them, which keeps the old MX5 more smoother flowing roof line, and the more rounded body style, similar to the NA-NB, to me, the arse end of the ND looks to "modern" Much like how I prefer the NC1 front bar, over the later models How long will I keep this car for is unknown, but currently, there's nothing else out there that "floats my boat" for a small, fun, little "sports car", that I can play with and enjoy looking at and driving But, who knows what the future holds, and going off current new car styling, if I replace it, it will be a older model something something       
    • looking forward to your t56 swap man its a game changer if it works! 
×
×
  • Create New...