Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I'm looking at purchasing a Haltech Platinum Pro plugin ECU for my R33 gtr and i'd like to obtain clarification whether the ECU will support the factory AFM's or totally rely on the MAP sensors. I vaguely recall reading that it can support both but i'd like to find out for certain.

In this respect, does the ECU operate or perform better under a particular setup e.g performance/economy wise? I realise this may trigger a wide debate but it would be good to obtain people's experiences and setups relating to this ECU.

Thanks,

Adrian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328670-haltech-platinum-pro/
Share on other sites

I think i may have found the answer to this from haltechs site

"Supports R32 GT-R twin MAF sensors" and " Selectable onboard internal MAP sensor rated to 150kPa (up to 1.5 Bar or 22psi boost)"

So i take it will support the twin afm's. Does anyone recommend the AFM approach over the MAP setup? Im generally looking at keeping the factory airbox thats why im keen on checking if its the preferred approach.

Thanks

An ECU is only as good as the person tuning it. Talk to your tuner and see what ECU/sensor setup they recommend.

The Platinum pro does support twin AFM's, it also has the option of an internal or external MAP sensor.

I have one in my R33 GTR, using the onboard MAP sensor, cold starts are great, idles perfectly, power wise its making 320kws on a run in tune, not sure on fuel economy as I've only put a few hundred kms on it since the run in.

Cheers,

Johno

Many thanks guys, this is exactly the type of information i was after. I should really get in contact with my tuner and Haltech direct.

Johno, you mention the internal MAP is working well in your setup. I'd be looking at a similar power figure (is that with the N1's?), but basically what i take from their site is the onboard unit would be efficient to 22psi. I think that is more than adequate on a standard internal engine. Obviously pushing more you would need to revert to the optional MAP sensor.

I think i also have read that the ECU supports two ignition/fuel maps, making it possible to switch between two tunes?

Cheers

Adrian

No probs, Its working quite well. I will be swapping over to external map shortly and turning up the boost. That's correct 2.5 Bar internal is supported. Im running 2530's but N1's (GTSS or -7's) will get you into that power range with a bit more response.

Yep, you can load maps quite easily. I aim to have 2 maps done, one for street (98 octane & fuel economy lol) and one for E85 when its more consistent & readily available.

Cheers,

Johno

My thoughts exactly johno.

Switching between the two maps; is it as simple as loading up from the laptop? I doubt it would have some sort of an external switch that would allow this, though it would be ideal!

In regards to knock control, i couldn't see anywhere in the spec's whether the unit responds to knock by say reducing power or rev's?

Cheers for the responses they have been helpful :)

You wil have to load via laptop for now.

Live Dual Mapping - Not yet, but I have been told its only a firmware update or 2 away, probably about 2-3 months.

The Pro series does full knock control, long term and short term trimming. It also does long term and short term Fuel control.

It will flash the engine check light each time a knock even occurs and even log it if you like.

  • 1 year later...

And without starting a new topic, are these plug and play into the rb25det series 2? They sound more functional than a power fc... Whats the price on one of these?

Auto tune mmmm. There is an auto tuner for power fc but I ain't have the gonads to try it out. All it needs to work is the wide band and some limits entered by the user. I think it should be an option, its nothing fancy really. Have the ecu know what car its on and let it load up some target afr's and start adjusting til they are met from the wideband feedback. After fueling, give timing until a threshold of knock is heard. Then the user can go over it to adjust anything if necessary.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...