Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is it common practise to put different fitment wheels on 34 GTR's?

I have 9" all round but am considering new wheels.

Some I have seen are 8.5 front and 9.5 rear.

What is preferred and what offset.

18 x what is best fit and what offset ....front and rear

19 x what is best fit and what offset ...front and rear

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328997-34-gtr-staggered-wheel-fitment/
Share on other sites

No! Same rolling diameter will be ok with the 4wd, but i think you will find some pretty heated discussions in here about retaining the same width for all wheels.

The jist of it is, none of the top gtr garages ever use staggered wheel sizes, diameter or width.

going different widths and then compensating with typre profile to try and get the same rolling diameter will probably still result in a slight difference in rolling diameter and probably isn't the best for the atessa system.

if i had an r34 gtr vs2 and money which u clearly have both of i would get 19x10.5 +12 or +15

i believe my man eugen will be able to help u out in this

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/5-...17-t327689.html

I stupidly tried this on a gtr once and the atessa system went nuts. Even when you are cruising along slowly, the torque would suddenly be ramped up to the front wheels, and you could see it on the mfd. It felt like the car was tramlining and you'd be fighting the steering on a perfectly straight road.

So been there, done that and never again.

And 10.5" wide +12 to +15 offset sits ideally on an r34 GT-R with about -0.5 deg camber all round. I've pulled to -3.5 degrees on the front and the rims look really sunken in. But with very minimal camber, there's no need to roll the guards and it wont stick out like dogs balls.

Yeah I have 19x10.5 +15 on mine and really need to reduce the camber to make them just "right".

I have about 3 degrees rear and they look a little sunken.

The 34 GTR has a wider track in the rear from factory, which is contrary to most other cars, incl 32/33 GTRs, and I personally wouldn't want to make the rear track any wider than it is in relation to the front, to do so could end up with quite an evil handler that would be fairly willing to swap ends once sideways.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I found the same with Subaru’s.  I own and love the SG9 Forester, after that model 2008+, Subaru threw the ugly stick at all their line up and somehow managed to make them look worse with every succeeding year.  lol
    • It's something we all have to consider as time marches on. Also consider lifted rally MX5 conversion at that point.
    • I should be fine for a few more years, whilst I do have arthritis I also exercise and do mobility training every day to keep as fit and healthy as I can, military life, which is the actual cause of most of my joint issues, has set daily regimes, which I weirdly enjoy I also train alot smarter now, not really focusing on lots strength or puffy muscles, I'm more focused on maintaining what I have for my future older self, I actually train as much mobility now as I do exercising Check out this "simple" drill I have been doing daily prior to training now for a while now, this has worked wonders in my all round mobility   
    • I'd say one thing that may make you sell is the same reason the guy with the hard top roof sold his. He got old, and his back was giving him too much grief stopping him getting in and out... Old guy said he was 73! He looked and sounded younger than 73 to me! Or maybe I'm just aligning with old people more...
    • Already looked at a few prior to getting the MX5, really nice car, had all the mod cons, but I wasn't really sold on the new "look" I did miss my 2017 Limited, and I personally prefer the "look" of the older car over the new model, but, when pondering I kept going back looking at MX5's But it was same same for the new ND's, I wasn't sold on the new "look", especially the RF with its weird roof, which only half goes down, like a targa top sort of thing As I stated before, I did look at NC's, but the cars I looked at were PRHT's, but I didn't like their roof line "look" of the PRHT, until I saw the soft top version, (someone on SAU posted a for sale ad for one with a soft top that caught my attention, you can blame them for my choice.....🤣) and.... that old style detachable hard tops were available for them, which keeps the old MX5 more smoother flowing roof line, and the more rounded body style, similar to the NA-NB, to me, the arse end of the ND looks to "modern" Much like how I prefer the NC1 front bar, over the later models How long will I keep this car for is unknown, but currently, there's nothing else out there that "floats my boat" for a small, fun, little "sports car", that I can play with and enjoy looking at and driving But, who knows what the future holds, and going off current new car styling, if I replace it, it will be a older model something something       
×
×
  • Create New...