Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

is the standard rb25 flywheel in my 33 gunna be fine to balance up on my rb30 crank and use in my 2530? im assuming that there wasnt any huge weight difference between rb25det flywheel and rb30e flywheel? i have the box out of my 33 already so access to flywheel is easy and my crank is sitting at my engine builders waiting for a flywheel so we can balance it.  thanks james

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329134-flywheel-question/
Share on other sites

all rb engines use the same flywheel so yes but id recommend a chromoly flywheel for peace of mind, herd some bad stories with high hp cars and stock flywheels
Like what? Flywheels disintegrating at high revs???

down here in hobart recently a flywheel came off an old holden and injured someone pretty badly but old holden engines had a habbit of loosing flywheels once high horse p.ower was run through them. Rb engines however are not built anything like an old 308. I do have a lot of trust in a standard flywheel for upto 400hp. And as its an rb30 bottom end being built it wont be revving as high as i had to rev the 25 bottom end.

Excellent, if all flywheels are the same i will pull the flywheel off the back of the 25 tonight.

Secondly, snozzle, do u run a chromoly flywheel? If so, what brand and what are they worth?

the can develop cracks after alot of abuse and eventually shatter - im running a twin plate that comes with a chromoly flywheel

nismo/exedy etc etc do lightweight chromoly flywheels

if you baby your car dont worry about it but if your gonna give it some abuse (majority of people on this forum) you should opt for a chromoly flywheel, not worth taking the risk, in my opinion

the can develop cracks after alot of abuse and eventually shatter - im running a twin plate that comes with a chromoly flywheel

nismo/exedy etc etc do lightweight chromoly flywheels

if you baby your car dont worry about it but if your gonna give it some abuse (majority of people on this forum) you should opt for a chromoly flywheel, not worth taking the risk, in my opinion

hahah i read this a day too late. standard flywheel already been balanced up with my crank and balancer. and yes car will be getting the ring smashed out of it. TRACK ONLY :) (plus.... secret, confidenial, shhh shhh, night time, back road, test work

:D )

oh and im guessing the heat scortch marks on my standard flywheel are normal??? i hope so....! If i hear any more 'shattered flywheel' stories im going to sh*t myself and build a scatter plate in my gearbox tunnel lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So where is this message group so we can organise another meet? Keen to come along and catchup. Might eventually be in a skyline again next year, but the Mustang will have to do for now. Also need to get the WRX back on the road. Stupid f**king money pit that thing is.
    • Stock equivalent turbo replacement is a bit of a nightmare. The old Hitachi ceramic things were pretty good for their time, but they have primitive, vintage aerodynamics. The only thing they have going for them is a light turbine**, and there are plenty of other light turbine options these days, in both materials and CNC manufacturing methods. So, the old stocker makes absolutely no power at all compared to its physical size and its (not very low) boost threshold and response. ** and the ONLY thing that was good about the ceramic turbine was that it was light. In all other respects it is a nightmare. To get a turbo that is anywhere near equivalent in terms of power capacity (ie, to avoid it being "bigger" and needing tuning/fuelling/etc) you have to physically downsize. And that is not a "stockish" replacement. Doesn't just fit where the old one did. At least a frame size down, probably need a new dump, probably need new inlet and outlet piping made on the compressor side, new hose connections as D said above. I say, if you have to suffer that much work, you might as well do the same work to fit an even bigger (than stock) turbo, have more power (and hence have to do injectors, ECU, etc), and love life, instead of suffering with stock power levels. Or, you get a light highflow from someone like Hypergear. A highflow that has not been pushed too far from stock. There are still modification consequences here though. HG's cores are smaller than the massive Hitachi core, so it is shorter, moves the compressor housing backwards and requires mods to the air side piping. Plus new hoses. Looks stock, mostly fits where the stock one did (with the previous caveats mentioned), makes a bit more power but can be run at stock boost levels and not cause too many ECU problems. But, seriously. It's 2024. Like - 25 years since the R33 came out. It's time to put an ECU in it. I Nistuned my car (on RB20 ECU then later again on the Neo ECU) and it was the single best thing possible for minimal money. Dial out the R&R bullshit, fix up the fuelling and timing to make it more efficient for normal driving (cut fuel consumption by >10%). Nistune is not an option for you unless you change the ECU, so you might as well just do a standalone. it will be worth it. And then you can tune it up to the limits of the injectors and AFM, which is pushing 200rwkW and enjoy some actual squirt, instead of the lazy barge-like motion you get from a stock engine, turbo and management.
    • He can't post pics until he's at 10 post count.
    • Welcome James.....will be interesting to see how much fun there is in the project. .....where's the pics?
×
×
  • Create New...