Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Question:

Should I drill and tap T3 holes in my T4 manifold and use a GT3076R T3 Divided .78, .82 housing or......Keep the T4 flange and use GT3076R T4 Divided 1.06 housing?

Question:

How much loss in spool time do you think the T4 1.06 will actually cause?

Details:

I am in the process of upgrading the turbo on my RB25. Last year I purchased an HKS cast low mount manifold without knowing it had a T4 flange. I have been told it is possible to drill and tap for a T3 turbo, however I am hesitant to do so. I feel that the large T4 manifold outlet flange, will cause harmeful turbuelnce when exhaust is trying to enter to the smaller T3 turbo inlet. I may just be over estimating how sensitive the magic that is happening in the manifold. I am hesitant to order the T4 1.06 because I think spool times will be negatively affected.

Aside from a Greddy manifold, full exhaust, injectors, front mount, fuel pump, esc. The engine is stock.....

Any help would be appreciated.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329247-rb25det-gt3076r-housing-advice/
Share on other sites

The manifold would be prone to cracking if you drill and tap another set of holes, T4 would be a better option with similar lag to a .82 single entry im guessing and you wont need to match port the turbo then.

You still haven't done that mod yet, hell you must take as much time as I do to do anything. Have to stop thinking too much about things and just get in and do it. A lot of the HKS cast low mount manifolds are tapped and drilled for both T4 and T3, mine is, no ill effects at all. It it still going OK, no cracks or such. And there is enough meat in the 0.82 to get into it with grinders and shape the exhaust housing throat to the same size as the manifold so that you have a smooth entry for airflow.

You should start a poll and see how many HKS cast low mounts are tapped for T3, T4, or both - you'd be surprised.

I think you'll find that the two ports on the turbo side flange are sized for the twin inlet T3 flanged turbine housings - if they are std . Actually what people call twin scroll T3 flange I believe is actually named "Euro T4" even though it has the same bolt pattern as single entry T3 turbine housings .

The Big T4 flange size has much larger ports than the T3/Euro T4 , some call the big T4 size T4 International pattern .

If you ever get to see the RB26 version of the HKS single cast low mount manifold you instantly notice how big its two outlet ports are . It because it was designed to have a HKS spec TA45S turbo on it and they use the T4 International flange and port size .

I'm not even sure you could port the RB20 HKS manifold out far enough to match the twin ports in the larger T4 International size footprint .

As for those twin scroll turbine housings from ATP , have a look inside them if possible because some people reckon they're a bit dodgy looking . I've no idea who makes them and no ones said they have Garrett markings on them so anyone's guess .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

disco, do you have any diagrams showing the dimensions of all the different flange/entry types? i've measured myne before and the ports were close enough to what was called T4 on a diagram i found. But i'm not sure i trust it

You still haven't done that mod yet, hell you must take as much time as I do to do anything. Have to stop thinking too much about things and just get in and do it. A lot of the HKS cast low mount manifolds are tapped and drilled for both T4 and T3, mine is, no ill effects at all. It it still going OK, no cracks or such. And there is enough meat in the 0.82 to get into it with grinders and shape the exhaust housing throat to the same size as the manifold so that you have a smooth entry for airflow.

You should start a poll and see how many HKS cast low mounts are tapped for T3, T4, or both - you'd be surprised.

Yeah, I am still trying to figure this out. I pretty much dropped the HX35 idea, as I really do not think it will fit down there. I am now deciding between the GT3076R and the Bord Warner S200SX. If I knew that the T4 1.06 housing was not going to be too "laggy", I would purchase it, it would save me the trouble of drilling my manifold. My engine is stock, so I will not be exceeding 425-450 whp. The S200SX seems like an interesting option as well, it is offered with a .82 T4 divided housing and is claimed to offer more than the GT3076R, not to mention it is much cheaper.............

S200SX check it out.........

yep, myne has both. but i'm gonna buy a t4 1.06 TS housing anyway for more powaaaa

on the topic, anyone know where to get these housings from at a decent price?

What are your power goals for the engine, and is your engine built? I am in the US, so I don't know the available elsewhere, but I was quoted $1345 shipped for the GT3076R T4 divided 3" v-band. I found just the housing for $392 at this website.....

T4 didvided housing

With my stock engine, and 450 whp goal, do you think this housing will be too "laggy"?

US 450whp and Aussie 450whp are two different things!

I have seen one of these make 22psi @ 4400rpm on an SR, the extra 25% capacity of the RB25 will see that sort of boost around or 3500rpm or better, with positive boost pressure way before that.

Make sure that manifold is def T4 divided.

Yeah, I am still trying to figure this out. I pretty much dropped the HX35 idea, as I really do not think it will fit down there. I am now deciding between the GT3076R and the Bord Warner S200SX. If I knew that the T4 1.06 housing was not going to be too "laggy", I would purchase it, it would save me the trouble of drilling my manifold. My engine is stock, so I will not be exceeding 425-450 whp. The S200SX seems like an interesting option as well, it is offered with a .82 T4 divided housing and is claimed to offer more than the GT3076R, not to mention it is much cheaper.............

S200SX check it out.........

Check out the new precision turbo, billet range... Go a 5557 with billet comp wheel, your choise of flange and size exh housings, ceramic duel bb core etc (no need for water cooling)... they're around 1200 USD.

I have one on a stock internals 25, soon to be tuned.

Don't bother with the website, just call them direct... great guys. Or Pm me and I can get you in contact with a dealer in Fl.

Cheers

Justin

disco, do you have any diagrams showing the dimensions of all the different flange/entry types? i've measured myne before and the ports were close enough to what was called T4 on a diagram i found. But i'm not sure i trust it

Check out the Garrett catalogue....it has the flange sizes near the back of the catalogue.

What are your power goals for the engine, and is your engine built? I am in the US, so I don't know the available elsewhere, but I was quoted $1345 shipped for the GT3076R T4 divided 3" v-band. I found just the housing for $392 at this website.....

T4 didvided housing

Already have a .82 IW gt30 on a standard manifolded 25. building a 30det and going hks mani so was gonna get a bigger housing with a t4 flange to suit.

Check out the Garrett catalogue....it has the flange sizes near the back of the catalogue.

thanks for that. just compared them all and my manifold is closest to T4 Divided. looks like the only difference between that and T4I is the width of the flange itself and the width of the bolt holes. Now the hardest part is figuring out exactly which flange these housings for sale on various websites have.

depends what you call laggy, everyone has a different idea on what is and isnt laggy. but if its similar to a .82 single scroll on a stockish 25 you should make 18-20psi by 4000rpm under decent load (4th gear). of course theres lots of other variables too, such as boost control, exhaust, tune etc

Do you guys think the T4 1.06 divided turbine housing is going to be "laggy" on an RB25 with bolt ons?

With 'bolt-ons' I believe the simple answer would be, yes.

With head work, I think the T4TS would rain on everyone's parade.

My current modifications are:

Greddy Intake manifold

Walbro fuel pump

750cc injectors

Nistune

FMIC

HKS BOV

Eboost2 boost controller

Blitz exhaust

Blitz downpipe

HKS cast manifold

Koyo radiator

FAL fans

Spec clutch

Aside from this, the engine completely stock. Mind you this is in a S14 240sx. I could deal with full boost at 4000 rpm, although I have no data to support that estimation. With the engine being stock and wanting to keep the revs reasonable, I don't want to have a "laggy" turbo without the pay off at high rpm.

With the modifications I have listed above, do you guys think around 425-50 rwhp will be attainable with a GT3076R? And at what boost level?

I think I might snoop around on the STI forums, as I think a few have using the T4 1.06 GT3076R.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...