Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday Shoppers. Today for sale is my 1989 R32 GTR

Car is close to standard no engine mods. Car has been kept extremely

clean and in great condition inside and out.

Whats in her:

HKS tripple plate clutch (before i owned it)

HKS Priest exhaust (before i owned it)

HKS air filters

Nismo Shocks and springs

WORK rezax roar 17x9" cherry black rims with red lip

RE30 bridgstone potenza tyres (worn)

(have standard gtr wheels with falken tyres in good cond. also at no extra cost)

Cross drilled and slotted disc brakes new bendix pads

both turbos reconditioned replaced original worn out ceramic wheels with durable steel wheels with

new 360 degree thrust bearing and cases.

Reco'd turbos have about 1500km on them

on the 11th of July 2010 car developed an engine knock while cruising. I pulled over imediately and got the car towed home. She lives in the driveway now only getting washed to keep her clean. An engine builder mate of mine suspects big end bearing damage.

I was already trying to sell the car so at the moment have no plans to fix the car myself so am selling cheap to someone who is keen to rebuild a clean gtr and give her the motor she deserves.

$13,500 NEGOTIABLE MAKE ME A RESONABLE OFFER. I can lower the price if buyer wants the

standard wheels

can also be found on carsales: http://www.carsales.com.au/all-cars/privat...&__Qpb=true

selling to fund new projects. Am building an LS1 holden HX premier and 5.0 litre VR SS

Interested in swapping for:

LS1 motor

tremec T56 Gearbox to suit LS1

or HX parts

VR SS parts

+ cash depending on how much your swapping.

Any requests for higher quality or other photos feel free to contact me.

am text message friendly 0408390010 name is Dion

Keen to sell other projects feeling way to neglected! make me a reasonable offer.

Thanks and happy shopping hope i can find her a good home.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329318-clean-r32-gtr-for-sale/
Share on other sites

wud u do swaps for a r33 turbo + cash ure way?

sorry mate swaps only for what is described in the first post

Interested in swapping for:

LS1 motor

tremec T56 Gearbox to suit LS1

or HX parts

VR SS parts

+ cash depending on the amount of parts

will maybe consider other LS1 or holden v8 vehicles.

ok not as much interest as id hoped maybe a price drop will entice you car builders!

$12,000 cash or swaps and cash according to original post.

Help me fund my other projects by gathering a good deal of your own!

cheers

Dion

i wish u did swaps for a car, id really want this

no ls series motor powered car no swaps

im gettin rid of my GTR mate no skyline will cut that void. PM if you wanna chat more please leave this for people interested in the car.

Cheers

Dion

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
×
×
  • Create New...