Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, need some advice, i just recently got my skyline through a good friend of mine. Problem i am running into is bad boost creep as the revs go up. I put a manual boost controller on to see if it would help to maintain it but no luck, and it plays around with the ecu as it try to adjust so it getting slow spots through the rev range. If i put the standard solenoid back on, will it sturdy the boost as it was designed to do, or is there another issue, i have checked for boost leaks and replaces lines, but still the same. The line running the wastegate is one that the charcoal canister usually runs too. any help would be great on the topic

Thanks

Josh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329517-r33-boost-creep-at-higher-revs/
Share on other sites

Get a decent boost source.

teeing a line from the evap canister is not a good way to control boost, and is most likely the source of your problem.

Use the nipple off the compressor housing or get a hose barb welded into your intercooler piping.

I didnt realise the stock turbos had a nipple?

What kind of dump pipe do you have?

If its a splt dump, it could be the issue. I had alot of problems with boost creep on my R33 with the split design. Even after having it ground down and fixed with the old wategate flapper issue. I put the stock one back on and it went away immediately.

Ended up having a custom bellmouth style made up instead and its still fine.

Do you lose much power by putting the stock one back on, and what's the bellmouth one, how is it different. Still new to turbo car. This is the setup that came on the car. I'm not bothered about running standard boost, I would put standard solenoid on if I new it would work, or ebc.

Do you lose much power by putting the stock one back on, and what's the bellmouth one, how is it different. Still new to turbo car. This is the setup that came on the car. I'm not bothered about running standard boost, I would put standard solenoid on if I new it would work, or ebc.

check out just jap here, youll be better off getting a 3" bellmouth then going back to the standard item. also a good ebc helps aswell, i am a big fan of the jaycar item its cheap and has some great reviews.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...