Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My car didn't came with any safety devices besides the good old seat belts :)

I would like it to have ABS & traction control as the traction in the wet is horrible, need to drive extra slow otherwise the rear wheels will break traction.

But on the other hand I don't see the point in traction control in my dad's Corolla, the engine is so low on torque you can't lose traction even if you floor it while the road is wet... only time it may lose traction is if you were driving super retarded in the rain or someone poured oil on the road.

Learn how to drive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I was last week in my s2 skyline and ended up in a car accident car. The car was totaled, pretty much i doubt its going to hit your glasses because the airbag is most likely going to hit your chest. But at the time the crash happened it happened in such a fast manner that you don't feel it only after would you might feel it, as most likely your going to have chest pains and whiplash from the seat belt. So you shouldn't worry about the airbags hitting your glasses while driving, plus the airbags when they do hit you they don't hurt much, i didn't even feel it when it hit me.

When my uncle was in a car accident (was driving his work car which was a 1997 BMW M5), the air bag smashed his face. I wish I had the pictures he showed me, but basically his whole face got completely messed up. Broken nose, fractured left eye socket, his right eye was so badly swollen the skin split, and bruised gums from where the air bag moved his teeth. He needed an operation to fix his eye socket, 6 stitches where his other eye split, and is still undergoing dental work to fix his teeth (two years after the accident).

No doubt airbags are necessary, I fully agree that removing it would be stupid. I hate to think what my uncles face would have looked like if he hadn't had an airbag. But they definitely hit you hard. Tests have shown that an airbag hitting you is equivalent in force to being hit in the face by a heavy weight boxer.

Edited by Hanaldo
No doubt airbags are necessary, I fully agree that removing it would be stupid. I hate to think what my uncles face would have looked like if he hadn't had an airbag. But they definitely hit you hard. Tests have shown that an airbag hitting you is equivalent in force to being hit in the face by a heavy weight boxer.

Doesn't make sense why people keep putting after market steering wheels on. I would much rather hit a airbag then to hit the steering wheel - Know this from experience :domokun:

Spot on ^

It's fair enough on an R32 or a car that didn't come with an airbag, I would get an aftermarket steering wheel as well. But I sure as hell wouldn't remove my airbag just for looks. R34 steering wheels are pretty good looking anyway, I would only replace it with an Evo wheel which has an airbag :domokun:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...