Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all, installed a catch can over the weekend, just want to make sure its right, because when i was driving home the other day my car seemed to nearly stall for a second and i thought that i have installed the can wrong. for the record i got a catch can with the air filter, so the engine can breath.

catch.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330356-is-my-catch-can-set-up-right/
Share on other sites

after some research last night i changed my setup, how does this look now?

catch-1.jpg

It's supposed to be a "closed" system. The first option is open to atmosphere, which contributes to the "almost stalling" you encountered.

The second option is the way I have installed mine. But unblock the PCV hose (between valley and plenum).

It's supposed to be a "closed" system. The first option is open to atmosphere, which contributes to the "almost stalling" you encountered.

The second option is the way I have installed mine. But unblock the PCV hose (between valley and plenum).

how come i need to unblock the hose? wouldnt this ruin the whole setup? as the fumes would still get into the intake?

The PCV valve in the plenum only opens under high vacuum, positive pressure jams it shut. The PCV valve is basically only open during "closed throttle", and the minimal amount of oil vapour that might be ingested isn't a problem for the engine.

The problem is when oil fumes are taken from the rocker covers and circulated back through the inlet side of the turbo. The oil (vapour) mixing with the fuel and air severely lowers the effective octane rating of the "fuel", which can cause the mixture to detonate. It won't detonate at effectively idle (throttle closed). The catch can is designed to condense the vapours so they don't reach the inlet side of the turbo.

The PCV valve in the plenum only opens under high vacuum, positive pressure jams it shut. The PCV valve is basically only open during "closed throttle", and the minimal amount of oil vapour that might be ingested isn't a problem for the engine.

The problem is when oil fumes are taken from the rocker covers and circulated back through the inlet side of the turbo. The oil (vapour) mixing with the fuel and air severely lowers the effective octane rating of the "fuel", which can cause the mixture to detonate. It won't detonate at effectively idle (throttle closed). The catch can is designed to condense the vapours so they don't reach the inlet side of the turbo.

so if i keep it blocked, whats the cons of that? cos id like to keep even the small amount of fumes out of there... or is there something very wrong with having it blocked?

ta

nissan did lots of research and put the pvc valve there

as did lots of other manufacturers

2nd setup looks right, but unblock the pcv, it does things at idle and light throttle but sfa on boost when your getting the most blowby

get some steel wool and put it in your catch can (making sure that non is gonna come off and go into the turbo)

the fine wool will catch the fine oil droplets, thus making the catch can more effective

nissan did lots of research and put the pvc valve there

as did lots of other manufacturers

2nd setup looks right, but unblock the pcv, it does things at idle and light throttle but sfa on boost when your getting the most blowby

get some steel wool and put it in your catch can (making sure that non is gonna come off and go into the turbo)

the fine wool will catch the fine oil droplets, thus making the catch can more effective

ok cheers, will look into the steel wool, and unblock the pipe, im gonna have to get some new pipe though since theres no way i getting the ball out lol

To me it looks like the 2nd pic that you have actually completely sealed off the cam covers from breathing at all.

Without the PCV or the breather to the intake pipe wouldnt the crank case pressure get rather high? As it has nowhere to go.

To me it looks like the 2nd pic that you have actually completely sealed off the cam covers from breathing at all.
Not at all. The piece marked "PVC line" is the pipe back down to the turbo intake.

Basically all that has happenbed that a can has been inserted between the LHS rocker cover and the turbo intake.

Ahhhh i see! Makes sense now, it just looked like it had a block in it with that grey circle :D If the intake pipe was there, then i would have understood!

And i would have called it differently, as people generally relate "PCV" to the line between the intake cam cover and the IM that actually has the valve in it. The turbo breather hose just has a little brass restrictor :)

Makes complete sense now!

Im thinking of modding my setup due to other issues i encountered, like below. (3rd line closest to radiator is "MS Paint'ed" on.)

Deleted breather filter, and PCV as per factory.

CanPossible.jpg

Edited by gotRICE?

i have heard about ppl putting a compressor water separator between the plenum and the rocker cover to filter out oil on that side and a catch can set up (like above) to filter out oil vapor on the other side. maybe something to look into ?

but the second set up look good just remove the ball bearing

why is everyone saying my setup is only venting the LHS valley cover? i have both valleys connected to one hose, then to the catch can, is this correct? both my valleys are going to the catch can correctly?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's a good point. The rears of the covers themselves have no baffling at all though. Higher up more chance of air for venting the crank case. Lower on the side more likely to be submerged. I might be able to fit them on the sides but with both the sump drain fittings being on the drivers side the passenger one will need to make a U Turn and be nearer the turbo. But it will look neat being not up on top.
    • It won't likely matter where along the cam covers you put the big fittings. I would suggest putting them on the sides if you can, simply because it will reduce the flow up through the baffles and thus reduce the amount of oil that gets put into the foam. It might not matter, but it seems like something to consider as a worthwhile thing to avoid.
    • Well, I have my IM240 results with a cammed LS1... My Nox was 0.11 and my CO g/km was 0.2. Euro4 is 0.08 and 0.1 respectively. I'm gonna say for a stock RB this is actually plausible, BUT in Australia they were complied pre-Euro2, so the limits were: Which as you can see, is way higher. I'd say a stock RB with a new OEM Cat could? actually pass Euro4 for NOX but you'd probably have to do a hell of a lot of testing to prove it, and getting a car emissions tested and carrying a certificate of emissions when/if you get pulled over may be cost prohibitive if it's even allowable to get your car tested and re-classified. You'd have to find out what the UK Govt is using as reference material. It may be non-negotiable.
    • I made a little more progress last night and added some E85 safe fuel tank baffle foam in behind the stock cam cover baffle plate.  It still feels really wrong shoving foam inside the engine but apparently its fine based on it pretty much being the MINES/Hi-Octane RB26 cam baffle kit and the few posts here I have found of people doing it and the lack of posts saying the foam broke down and ruined the motor... Still plan to check it frequently though lol The last step for this round of oil control modifications I plan to make is to add some -12AN fittings to the cam covers and connect them to some (already existing luckily) -12AN fittings on the sump. Basically a sudo head drain/sump breather/pressure equaliser without having to remove the motor and do the one on the rear of the head. My plan is to add them to either the tops or the sides of the cam covers at the back. unless there is a compelling reason to have them at the front on the sides which i have seen a few times though they were all on RB26 cam covers from memory so that may be due to the stock breathers being on the back and the integral baffle being different ?    
×
×
  • Create New...