Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I haven't read this thread much except the first post but here's a comparison.

Ant (Ant97GTR) and I were at winton last weekend and we were both doing the same lap times. low 1min35's.

Powerwise I'm about 230 and he's 280 or something.

Both had worn semi's (his were a worse)

Both have good suspension and mild brake upgrades.

Both had fun.

Check out the vids in the vic events thread.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Wi...40&start=40

Cost wise there would be a big difference. 32 GTST = 10k ish, 33 GTR = 22k ish...

Upgrade wise I'm sure mine would have been cheaper as GTR stuff charges a premium because of the badge.

The comparisons are weight vs cost I think.

A light rear wheel drive will be cheaper because of tyres, brakes, suspension, fuel etc

You will have fun in both. My pic would be an S14 platform.

Gah Russ you're killing me...

for reference though, your car is stripped isn't it? His is still street trim? A/C stereo etc?

Weight is clearly a big advantage.

Edited by ActionDan
  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Gah Russ you're killing me...

for reference though, your car is stripped isn't it? His is still street trim? A/C stereo etc?

Weight is clearly a big advantage.

Back seats are out and has a half cage. A/C is gone, CF bonnet. Still has sterio. That's it.

Ant's is still factory weight.

Just join the team underdog! You know you want to.

Watch UFC and go for the guys that's getting all smashed up at the start. When it turns around and he wins you'll have a little smile that won't go away.

Btw I did a 1:35.18 and Ant did a 1:35.33. :nyaanyaa:

I joined team underdog when I bought this CA18 S13 :nyaanyaa:

I expected Baron or Snowy to chime in with some GT-R love...

What I "want" is a GT-R that doesn't get caught by lesser powered cars and that doesn't cost 50% more to build :P

I joined team underdog when I bought this CA18 S13 :P

I expected Baron or Snowy to chime in with some GT-R love...

What I "want" is a GT-R that doesn't get caught by lesser powered cars and that doesn't cost 50% more to build :D

remove the awd :nyaanyaa:

i seriously see this as one of the only ways to get major weight out of a gtr, the more i think about it the more i want to do it

or just put a rb26 in a gtst.

Or stick with a perfectly good (cheap) RB25.

Unless you have a spare RB26 lying around I see no reason at all to go RB26. Except maybe arguably better exhaust note.

Russ you're obviously happy with the lower cost and the lower weight of your platform. Are there reasons you would consider going GT-R?

Because he turns homo and wants to go the hairdressers in his GTR for a $86 bleach and perm! :/ He is already turning his back on the brotherhood by putting a flithy RB25 in it.... :P

You want a GTR, just go buy one. They are good things, and at the end of the day a car will only be as quick as the money that has been spent on it. Buy the right GTR that has already got the rebuilt engine with sump etc, perhaps brakes and rebuilt transfer cars etc and you will be out there enjoying yourself....

Russ you're obviously happy with the lower cost and the lower weight of your platform. Are there reasons you would consider going GT-R?

To be honest. No.

fixed

Good form. Although I will probably be bucking that trend when going for a 300rwkw RB25 soon :/

Dont you know? GTR owers spend more money on their montly grooming and hair cuts then GTSt owners do on petrol, food and personal hygiene products :)

Haha Gold :P

rofl, I used to own one Roy and I didn't suffer from that affliction, maybe you just keep "interesting" company?

I have come out of the local butchers after hours where i have been eating raw meat fresh off the bone to see GTR owners under the street lights at night giving each other reach arounds and engaging in copulation with one another.... they also spend far too much time in front of their car's heavy tinting checking their eyebrows are correctly plucked and their 'teased' and 'tinted' hair is in place. :/

I prefer flanos and women...but thats just me ! :P

Ants gtr has a lot more suspension it it now compared to Russ's bolt on gear. Ant was telllig me at Sandown a month ago it now has the same suspension in it as most of the Racepace gtr crew.

Hey not all GTR owners spend money on beauty products. I cut my own hair and still can't afford to track my gtr?

I have come out of the local butchers after hours where i have been eating raw meat fresh off the bone to see GTR owners under the street lights at night giving each other reach arounds and engaging in copulation with one another.... they also spend far too much time in front of their car's heavy tinting checking their eyebrows are correctly plucked and their 'teased' and 'tinted' hair is in place. :/

I prefer flanos and women...but thats just me ! :P

ROFL Gold!

Ants gtr has a lot more suspension it it now compared to Russ's bolt on gear. Ant was telllig me at Sandown a month ago it now has the same suspension in it as most of the Racepace gtr crew.

Hey not all GTR owners spend money on beauty products. I cut my own hair and still can't afford to track my gtr?

Same, I don't like spending more than $10 on a haircut and prefer to get the missus to do it when possible, she won't let me shave it though, prolly coz I have dumbo ears.

Roy was it you who put the 32 through the fence at Targa? If it was, did you wish the fronts would engage to pull you around the corner rather than letting you slide through it? Semi serious question...

I'm a big GT-R fan, but for your goals I think you could achieve what you're after for a lower cost with an S14/R33 GTS-T etc

I like my S13 because it's light, fast, handles well, parts are easy to source and cheap-ish and most of all because it's a heap of fun. I'd still buy a GT-R, but I'd probably buy a GT3 or a Radical first! They used to hold more of an allure for me a few years ago, but not so much anymore.

As for the Targa 32, that was Ben (Marlin).

To be honest, an R33 GTS-T isn't really on the cards, I switched to my R33 GT-R because the GTS-T just didn't excite me enough, and it wasn't just a lack of power. That said, I also used to have the idea that RWD + tubo just meant constant dorfito but after owning the S13 and seeing first hand that even I can set it up for and drive it grip style that was a bt of a revelation.

It'd be S14 or R33 GT-R, which comes down to cheaper track car that I'm unlikely to want to really drive on the street on the occasional weekend or a more expensive track car that I'd be happier driving around on the occasional weekend. It's the old brains vs emotion thing if you get me. I was pretty attached to my GT-R, sold it to retain my license and give myself some time to grow up and stop being a knob on the streets. I'm old enough for that now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...